Quiksilver Bankrupt

Just in: Vultures Circle Quiksilver!

Two hedge funds fight over debt-ridden, bankrupt surf icon…

One month ago, Quiksilver Inc filed for bankruptcy. Took you by surprise? Yeah, me too. Who follows balance sheets?

(Read about that here.)

At the time, it was revealed by Bloomberg Biz that “Quiksilver Inc. is preparing to file for bankruptcy as soon as Tuesday evening in a deal that would hand control of the beleaguered surfwear chain to investment firm Oaktree Capital Management, according to people with knowledge of the deliberations.”

Today it was reported (source: Dow Jones newswire) that Oaktree is going to have to slug it out with Brigade Capital Management for the right to, what, strip the guts out of the company, and sell it at a profit down the track? Yeah.

Here’s the deal according to Dow: In a filing in US Bankruptcy Court in Wilmington, Delaware, lawyers for Quiksilver’s creditors revealed that Brigade Capital had made a “superior” offer to finance the company’s restructuring under chapter 11.

Brigade is offering Quiksilver a $US115 million ($A156m) bankruptcy loan that is “cheaper, longer in duration and provides the debtors with greater flexibility,” the creditors said, a part of a transaction that is better than Oaktree’s “with respect to virtually every substantive economic and non-economic term.”

Quiksilver filed for bankruptcy last month in a $US279m debt-for-equity swap with Howard Marks’s Oaktree Capital. The deal includes $US175m — but only $US115m of new money — in bankruptcy financing provided by Oaktree and Bank of America that has allowed the company to keep its doors open during its chapter 11 restructuring.

The deal also includes a hefty $US20m breakup fee owed to Oaktree if Quiksilver, which owns more than $US200m in Quiksilver debt, fails to execute the swap in bankruptcy.

The Oaktree-backed plan “does not represent a new offer from an outside investor who could just as easily walk away if the terms prove unsatisfactory, but a strategic manoeuvre by Oaktree to protect its substantial investment while simultaneously sweeping up significant value from unsecured creditors,” the creditors said in court papers.

Representatives of Quiksilver and Oaktree couldn’t be reached for comment.

Los Angeles-based Oaktree is a big player among so-called distressed-debt firms that look to acquire troubled companies at discount. It owns 73 per cent of Quiksilver’s debt and has pledged its support for the restructuring, which requires court approval. Oaktree also owns a stake in Australian surfwear company Billabong after participating in a 2013 restructuring.

A hearing on the Oaktree-backed deal is scheduled for Wednesday.

Quiksilver is one of the best-known and longest-operating surf and snowboard clothing brands, designing and distributing its products under the Quiksilver, Roxy and DC brands.

The company, which traces its roots to Victoria, began making boardshorts for surfers in the US in the 1970s and is now based in Huntington Beach, California. Its products are also sold internationally; the European and Asia-Pacific businesses aren’t part of this bankruptcy filing.

The cash-strapped company has in recent years been plagued by business issues that slowed the delivery of Quiksilver products to stores in North America. It has been working to turn around the business since 2013, executing the sale of assets including Mervin Manufacturing, a snowboard maker, and Hawk Designs, named for skateboarder Tony Hawk, and a stake in an online retailer called Surfdome Shop.

Although those deals raised funds, operational troubles and continued weak results were exacerbated earlier this year by the labour strife at the Port of Los Angeles.

Quiksilver’s revenue in its most recent quarter decreased to $US333m with margins at 47.1 per cent, resulting in a net loss of $US38m. During the same quarter in 2014, the company reported a loss of $US38m on revenue of $US397m and margins at 48.9 per cent. The company listed assets of $US337m and debts of $US826m when it filed for bankruptcy protection.

Still awake?

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Simon Says
Simon Says
10 years ago

I was literally falling asleep til the last paragraph. Note to the accountants at Beach Grit.. When reporting financial results and reporting margins and losses in the same sentence try to remember to leave in the word “gross” in front of the word margin. In fact, I would just not go there since you know nothing of what you are writing about. On top of all that, Quiksilver actually failed to report it’s earnings (losses) in the latest quarter. This article appears to suffering from “gross” negligence..!! Sorry folks but do yourselves a favor and get your facts straight..!!

Suss Oldman
Suss Oldman
10 years ago

Words, words, words

Fred d'Orey
Fred d'Orey
10 years ago

i hope quik and billa go down and never come back. all they did was multiply the crowds all over the world making surf a much more violent sport than it needs to be. surfers don’t need brands. we can wear whatever to go surfing. i only use brands that don’t promote surfing, don’t sponsor contests or professionals, don’t make campaigns. basically, local small brands. just think about it, it makes perfect sense. fuck the corporate surfing brands!!

Cap'n Crunch
Cap'n Crunch
10 years ago
Reply to  Fred d'Orey

Didn’t you write for some Brazilian surf mags?

That Guy
That Guy
10 years ago

If they stop making poor decisions then they will be back in the black in no time. Rossignol cost them a huge chunk out of the business. I would get rid of quite a few team riders, and put a handful on. Have a look at their clothing line, their new wetsuits are actually really good, look at Roxy on a whole

Captain Clark
Captain Clark
10 years ago

Sounds fishy to me. I’m no industry mogul but taking a company to chapter 11 can be very profitable for the round table king Arthur type.

funky Gibbon
funky Gibbon
10 years ago

I think it would actually be pretty easy to turn them around with the roster of surfers and the history they have and this shows by the interest in them.

A nip here and a tuck there and more of a focus on key products in key areas that people actually want rather than shit ts and badly made accessories. As billabong have proved it doesn’t take long to get back into profit.

Trogan Fan
Trogan Fan
10 years ago
Reply to  funky Gibbon

the roster of surfers? They’ll be the first things cut.

funky Gibbon
funky Gibbon
10 years ago
Reply to  Trogan Fan

Maybe a few of the lesser known ones but the Dane’s and Craig’s are the only thing keeping them relevant at all.

James B
James B
10 years ago
Reply to  funky Gibbon

Dane is gonna be the first one to get fired.


10
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x