An interview with The New Yorker staffer on a life so beautifully squandered…
It’s hard to step outside these days without tripping over a review of the William Finnegan book Barbarian Days.
The Wall Street Journal called it “gorgeously written and intensely felt… dare I say that we all need Mr Finnegan… as a role model for a life, thrillingly, lived.”
The LA Times said, “It’s also about a writer’s life and, even more generally, a quester’s life, more carefully observed and precisely rendered than any I’ve read in a long time.”
It threw me under the bus of a two-day obsessive read. I’d dived into Finnegan’s work in the New Yorker before, including an excerpt from the book about his time as a kid in Hawaii (read here) and figured the memoir would be gently entertaining but not especially adventurous. I imagined a writer with a loosely knotted bow-tie and a drooping moustache. A delicate New York gentleman, a flabby enthusiast.
I’d only penetrated three chapters into the book when we suddenly camping on Maui waiting for Honolua Bay to break and, shortly after, camping on the empty beach at Tavarua for a week and surfing a new discovery called Restaurants.
Soon, Grajagan in 1979, Africa and, later, among the big-wave surfers of Ocean Beach, San Francisco, and, then, spending long vacations on Madeira, waiting for Jardim Do Mar’s heavy deep-water right to break.
Photos scattered through the pages showed the author to have visible obliques, was long-haired and tanned. Finnegan was, is, a… stud?
As it turned out, the sixty two year old Finnegan is a pal of the former Surfer editor, pro surfer and Encyclopedia of Surfing curator Matt Warshaw. Matt said he’d cast an email introduction, which he did, and then added,
“You know he plays tennis with Martin Amis.”
(Amis, if you’re late to the reading game, is a very famous British novelist. Try London Fields for an intro to his work.)
Finnegan, Warshaw was implying, is significant.
Yeah, he is.
I’d clamour children underfoot for a chance to hear his eloquence in person. I wanted to be blinded by the glare of his intellect, his adventurous spirit, despite my usual rule of avoiding better men. Where I chase the assurance of perfect safety, Finnegan wasn’t afraid to flaunt his follies in the face of danger.
Maybe I could learn something?
Tell me, I wrote to Finnegan, what is the mind-set that consistently sends a man over the ledge?
“For me, it’s usually a much more conscious decision when I don’t go,” he wrote. “That’s when I actually do some thinking, and doubt creeps in, and discretion becomes the better part of valor. This goes for paddling out on a scary day as well as stroking into a scary wave.
“Once I’m scared, I usually stop surfing, or certainly stop surfing as well as I do when not scared. That tipping point has rational content, usually, based on your experience, which in my case is a lot of years now. But it also has irrational parts, which I try to control and tamp down with little pep talks to myself. Unfortunately, I’ve sometimes succeeded in calming myself down to the point that I’ve tried to surf waves I truly didn’t have the board for, or simply couldn’t handle, and had no business attempting, and have then come close to drowning.
“The decision to paddle out on a bigger day is, for me, sometimes a quite separate thing. Often, you can’t actually see from shore what it’s doing. If there seems to be a reliable channel, I’ll sometimes paddle out with the decision about whether to actually surf still reserved. I’m just going out to see what it looks like. I did that a couple of years ago at Tres Palmas, Puerto Rico, on a big swell. I’d never surfed the place before, and we could just catch glimpses of a couple of guys towing way outside, but we couldn’t really see what the waves were doing – we could only see the tops. But I had a gun, so I paddled out.
“It turned out to be incredibly good, and not that hairy – one guy was even ripping on a shortboard. Nobody could see any of our rides from shore. But for me that decision to paddle out usually turns on my own weird fear–a visceral, anticipatory fear of the feeling I get after I don’t paddle out. That sickening, I-didn’t-even-try feeling. It’s the worst. Actually worse, in my experience, than the traumatized, jesus-I-nearly-drowned feeling. Of course, there have been many times I didn’t paddle out and I was sure I made the right decision. Big Pipe, Maverick’s, Waimea, huge Ocean Beach, maxed-out Jardim, etc. Those decisions don’t haunt me. It’s the judgment calls where afterward I think I chickened out that kill me.”
If he could swing back decades, back into surfing prime, in those days when he was all over Tavarua and Grajagan, would he do anything different?
“I would paddle a few hundred yards down the reef at Grajagan and surf the right fucking spots instead of wasting a glorious, super-clean, week-long swell riding big mushburgers up at what later got named Kong’s. That was 1979, and there was nobody around, and my friends and I had never been there before. We were camping in a half-collapsed tree house, and there were only two of us surfing. The place was already famous, and we had heard about these long fast barreling lefts. But we somehow never figured out that the great waves – Money Trees, Speed Reef, I think they’re called – were way down inside someplace. That was the single stupidest thing I’ve done surfing. Otherwise – there are definitely waves I should have gone on, barrels I should have pulled into. But most of the times that I didn’t push hard enough were probably for the best. I got myself into enough trouble. I’m grateful that things didn’t turn out worse.”
Not that he isn’t adverse to a little dance with fate, even in his harvest years.
“At 62, I’m still looking for the same old kicks, I think. Of course, I don’t surf as well as I once did, which is horrible. And there are places, starting with Puerto Escondido, that I know I shouldn’t go back to. I can’t say I’m not tempted, though, especially when it’s flat around here in July. Two winters ago, I got two intense barrels back-to-back on the North Shore. That was just a few weeks after my 60th birthday. No fool like an old fool!”
When I asked if he thought surfing was elevating or just another pointless pursuit he wrote, “It’s supremely useless, I think, and not at all ennobling. Which is not to say that a great many people, starting with you and me, don’t get a great deal out of it – even a reason to live. It just does nothing, obviously, for anybody else. It’s the ultimate selfish pursuit. You could argue that it teaches its devotees a few things about self-reliance and the grandeur of Nature – maybe even a little humility – and I guess I wouldn’t argue with that. But in the end surfing, in my opinion, does little or nothing to build or improve character. As we all know, a lot of assholes surf, and some of them surf well.”
On the plus slide, “a lot of my best friends surf, and it can be a great deep thing to share with people you really like,” he wrote. “Non-surfers are certainly never going to understand it.”
Finnegan’s been a staff reporter at The New Yorker since 1987. No one reports better than the New Yorker. How, I asked, could surfing be reported better?
“I’m not a press critic,” he wrote. “But what I do read is way too advertiser-friendly. BeachGrit seems to be an exception. (Am I right?) Readers can smell where a mag’s loyalties lie, and if those are not largely with the readers, everybody knows it. Surfing is an unusual journalism niche because the interests of the surf industry, which very largely finances the surf media, are fundamentally at odds with the interests of most surfers, at least as I understand them. They want to ‘grow’ the sport. We’d like it to shrink, reducing crowds.
“So we look at mags that are obviously in bed with the corporations trying to sell us stuff – and always trying, naturally, to find more customers – and we know that those mags are in some basic way not on our side, and that they will never take an honest, independent look at those corporations – at their reliance on Chinese sweatshops, say, to produce boards, board shorts, etc, just to take the most obvious example.
“Not every surfer is concerned about sweatshops, of course, but the journalistic bad faith underneath the relationship between most glossy surf mags and their readers has a stench that, at some level, everybody over the age of 12 is aware of. It’s simply not a straightforward relationship. They’re not just trying to entertain and inform us. They’re trying to sell us shit, and not only through the ads but through editorial. Now let me see if I can find my way off this soapbox without turning an ankle.”
Chris Dixon and Frank: please email [email protected] from the address you'd like your BeachGrit login on.
Commented on Disqus? Log out, tap the Disqus button, and your old name and comments come back. The box is ours.
Your comments are still here. Every one of them.
Twelve years of BeachGrit comments came across from Disqus. Connect and we will show you how many are yours. We get your username, nothing else.
Connect Disqus to reveal.
Matt Warshaw to the f’king rescue.
I don’t disagree w/ Finnegan for the most part, but when one of the mainstream mags even sniffs around at a juicy topic, the STICK TO SURFING, ASSHOLES vitriol does fly forth from the 9-5 masses. Also, nothing is stopping, say, the New Yorker from covering drug use in surfing, or the funding of surf brands by drug $$, or how Grubby Clark monopolized the surfboard market. (See: Blank Monday, by Finnegan).
I respect his opinion and can only speak for SURFING Magazine but honestly, it is a pretty damn straightforward relationship.
Our job in surf media is not to directly sell shit. Our job is to create quality content and inspire surfers by showing them really good surfing, in really good waves, around the world. It’s the brand’s job to piggyback off this content and sell their own products, but that doesn’t effect our decisions of showcasing what we think is rad.
Do magazines make surfing more popular and create more crowds? Unfortunately yes. What’s the alternative option? Make surfing look lame so no one wants to do it? I’m pretty sure wavepools are doing that. We could be in luck.
AI was rad – we saw it a million times in features in Surfing. But nobody told the groms who actually read the mags what wasn’t rad about AI. A good “AI is a hectic drug addict” story would have sold plenty of mags, but then what to do about Billabong? We get it.
I think the fact that the surf industry is so small makes being honest more difficult. It’s hard to really rip into someone when you know you’re going to have to see them socially.
Many years ago I did a very drunken interview with a friend who is a fairly successful professional skateboarder. The next day, when I listened to it, it was pure gold. He got totally honest with the reality of his job, from how he felt like he was being taken advantage of by his primary sponsor, how the industry by and large treats riders like disposable products, how he couldn’t afford health insurance and lived in fear of a serious injury because it would kill his career, and how stoked he was to find a non endemic sponsor that was actually treating him like an athlete. No more sleeping six guys to a hotel room, a living wage, all that stuff.
It never saw the light of day. I realized that, as much as I wanted to run it and piss everyone off, it would have made him a total pariah. And he was all in, not much of a backup plan. I didn’t have it in me to throw him under the bus like that.
I think that, when all the mags are finally dead, and it’s really just a matter of time, we’ll see things open up more. Not because there’s some regime in power colluding to keep everything secret, but because internet dorks who don’t really have any industry ties are much more free to speak their minds.
eg Louis Samuels, until they get threatened with a lawsuit.
the problem finnegan identifies is not with the individual photographers or editors that put together the images/visual stories. the issue he’s raising is systemic, and i don’t think there’s any disrespect towards the individuals who work in the industry to acknowledge it.
the fact is, the surf brands do fund the surf media, and neither can exist in their current form unless they continue to “grow” the industry, which means finding new people/new markets to conquer.
while the average adult surfer like me may occasionally feel “inspired” by images of other, better, surfers, our primary focus is not buying new stuff, its finding more time to surf and finding good, uncrowded waves to ride. simple as that. the current surf media/surf industry doesn’t do anything for us in that respect. so there’s a disconnect between what the media/industry wants and what the average mainstream surfer wants. the surf media does a pretty good job of disguising that because the images you guys create are so spectacular.
You don’t like pools?
Billy nails it.
Hey Dell, when you ran the Bong party line and proclaimed loudly and enthusiastically that AI must have died from dengue despite everyone with half a brain cell seeing that was impossible, did that Billy Finnegan “surf journalism in bad faith” spiel spike any shred of remorse? You know looking back in retrospect?
Cause to me, that was the ultimate example of surfing journalism operating in bad faith with it’s readers.
…the drugs surfers use; the hookers they fuck, the other men they grease. It ain’t my place to go there. Contradictory, yeah, I guess.
So when the world champ dies alone in a hotel room from an OD, you’d rather cover the reader in BS than countenance the truth?
Why?
Ain’t that exactly the stench Bill smells from his penthouse on the upper east side?
I remember reading a great article in STAB by Chas…
http://beachgrit.com/2014/1… No mention of Dengue fever…
This is very 2012 RealSurf Steve. But please continue.
There was definitely a Billabong company line being towed by the surf media at the time, but I also felt it was about respect as well. AI was a larger than life character in our sport and no one wanted to remember him as another dead junkie in a hotel room.
Bizarrely I think they missed a marketing trick with the whole AI saga. Billabong could be spun to be the brand of the idiosyncratic left but instead we’re all left scratching our heads at the shin length boardshorts.
a good read.
as someone who has worked both sides of the fence, i can tell Billy Finnegan that the journalistic-bad-faith/in-bed-with-the-surf-corporations thing is utter bullshit. at 40 grand a year and an ocean life gone, surf editors could give a flying fuck about who they offend. they just want to finish the god damn thing before deadline. the reckoning comes afterwards, in the offices of morally challenged advertising directors, publishers, and narcissistic surf executives.
…it’s subtler than you think. Most surf magazines are edited by just-out-of-college twenty somethings who faint like southern belles with an attack of the vapours at even the hint of a menacing phone call from their boss, an advertiser or a pissed-off surfer. You mix that with a powerful advertising manager who can arrange the editor’s sacking with a yell across the cubicles and…yeah… there isn’t a lot of spine.
Lulz.
The feeling I had reading Barbarian Days whether it was intentional or not was that of the selfishness of our pursuit, I said it before that at times I felt almost a dislike for Mr Finnegan, not in a personal way really but more of a projection to all of us for the selfish histories we have created for ourselves. Guilt perhaps but at least I try not to be an asshole in the water but certainly I have been to those around me in getting in the water.
Anyway it’s well worth your time.
A flabby enthusiast , indeed.