"On the WSL's master list of embarrassments,
though, it's not even in the top 10."
Last night, after a pleasing vegan pizza (red lentil
ragu, oven-roasted kale, tahini etc), I came home to, a,
an apartment whose supply of Japanese whisky had been exhausted,
and, b, a squall of social media activity.
It was enough to trigger some sort of sad feeling, if I was open
to these sorts of things.
The social circuit buzzed because of a story, two days ago,
where I wondered aloud if a world title granted after one event,
with ten competitors, and where the winner didn’t make a takeoff,
was a little overcooked.
I did forget what year I’m in and that any sort of critique is
hate and so on, particularly if the person is female or gay. To
question someone who is both, even if the issue has nothing to do
with gender or sexing, is suicidal.
Anyway,
Keala Kennelly issued an invitation on Instagram for readers to
pile on, which they did with gusto.
(Click here, it’s pretty
long. Some very good points are raised. The Inertia’s Zach
Weisberg and Blue Crush lead Kate Bosworth make
cameos.)
https://www.instagram.com/p/Bv02Ailj_ZH/
Made me wonder.
Should criticism of one-event world titles be quarantined,
should I have known this, and therefore did I deserve the
scorn?
Who else y’gonna ask? Matt Warshaw, king of surf
history, one-man operator of the Encylopedia of Surfing, the most
valuable property in the game.
BeachGrit: I got pitch-forked by mobs last night after
questioning the validity of one-event world titles, with reference
to Keala Kennelly’s big-wave crown and Cori Schumacher’s longboard
titles. KK’s is an interesting subject to discuss. Didn’t make a
wave in the final and there were only ten other competitors in the
event although, yes, the waves were very dangerous and she’s a
brave gay woman etc. Does it take, as the WSL suggests although it
clearly vacillates on the issue as evidenced by the BWT award, a
tour to make a title? In your opinion etc.
Warshaw: A one-event world title lowers the odds that the champ
is legit. A tour is the way to go, but all that does is bump the
odds that the champ is deserving. We’ve been flaying our pro tour
champs as long as there’s been a pro tour. Not all, but some.
The obvious question, where do you place KK’s big-wave
world title?
It’s an embarrassment. Not for Keala, but the WSL. On the WSL’s
master list of embarrassments, though, it’s not even in the top
10.
Those pre-tour single-event world champions, like
Midget, Felipe Pomar, Nat, Hemmings, Rolf Aurness, Jimmy Blears . .
. how do you rate ‘em?
Midget deserved his title, just the way Damien Hardman deserved
his. Smart, clean, beautiful surfing. Neither one ever set you on
fire, but give ‘em the crown and congratulations. Felipe Pomar as
world champ is a head-scratcher. Nat Young surfed circles around
him. But you gotta go back and figure out what the criteria was
that afternoon in Peru, probably it was a biggest-longest wave
deal, and that makes it harder to gainsay.
Nat in ’66 was a hands-down winner. But here’s a twist. That was a
three-round contest, and David Nuuhiwa won the opener, so if that
event been like every other world title of the era, David is your
world champ. Nat didn’t even make the final that first round. But
he won the next two rounds, didn’t even break a sweat, there’s your
champ, fair and square. Hemmings in ’68 rode the biggest waves the
furthest distance, but Midget very much looked like the winner to
me. Midget had a win and two runner-up finishes between ’64 and
‘70, so he’d be your champ for the decade. Rolf was totally legit
in 1970. Blears in ‘72—the whole event was black comedy, the surf
was shit in the finals. Bob Hawke could’ve won if he got the right
waves. The women champs were on the level, start to finish:
Phyllis, Joyce Hoffman, Margo, and the criminally unknown Sharron
Weber were all deserving.
If there is a validity to single-event world titles,
does that make whomever win the Olympics next year a world
champion, even if it’s at one-foot Chiba and some donkey gets
lucky? And might there, very soon, with big wave titles, ISA
titles, junior titles, Olympics etc, be a glut of meaningless world
champions, as in boxing?
“Olympic champ” is its own category, adjacent to but separate
from “world champ.” Which sounds like hair-splitting, and yeah I
think we’re already into a glut situation. In the Warshaw Manual of
Style, Usage and Elucidation, “world champ” by itself refers to
either the single-event gang we discussed above, or the world tour
winners. Anything else gets prefaced: “1988 juniors division
amateur champ,” or “1996 longboard world champ.” How boring is
this? Is this more or less boring than the Round One heats Longtom
was frothing on day before yesterday?
I can’t even express the thrills this gives me. Do you
count Layne Beachley’s masters’ title among her world titles,
making it eight not seven and still one tiara beyond
Gilmore?
No.
And Gary Elkerton, what did he win, four masters titles?
Is he a four-time world champ? Same as MR?
Those four masters wins are worth more than the participation
trophies my kid got for soccer, but they’re not world titles. Gary
got tag-teamed out of a for-real world title that one year,
though.
Let’s veer left slightly and recap that Pipe tag-team
with Kong.
1993 world title showdown at Pipe, second semifinal, four-man
heat, Gary, Derek, Larry Rios, and I can’t remember the fourth guy.
Gary was in second and heading for the final, along with Derek, but
Larry just needed a small score to knock Gary back to third.
Seconds before the horn, the wave comes. Derek paddles on the
inside and forces Gary to back out, then Derek pulls up and gives
it to Larry, who gets the score. Derek went on to win the contest
and the title. God’s honest truth, I was on the beach that
afternoon at Pipe and didn’t notice that double-team thing. I don’t
think there were any rules broken, in any event. But there are
things you can do in a four-man heat, obviously, that you can’t do
man-on-man. If Derek and Larry worked something out beforehand, and
it wasn’t against the rules, then fair play to them. Hate the game,
not the players.
Gimme your thoughts about CJ’s 2001 abbreviated tour
world title after our Islamic brothers took their birds down on New
York City and DC. It demonstrates, I think, CJ’s ability to see the
world clearly that he doesn’t go around calling himself a world
champ. Or maybe he does. Does he?
I think the point we’re making here is that the whole thing is
maybe at best half serious. Suicidal jihadists gave us a world
champ, and I think it’s surfy to laugh at that, and laugh harder at
PT winning the first pro title without taking out a single event
that year, while also acknowledging that CJ and PT are both
world-class surfers. Then of course we wait for a new Kai Lenny
edit, and I’ll take that very seriously indeed.