It’s akin to having a cellar full of chrysalises
but locking the door and losing the key.
I was not wrong in my early assertion that “Make or
Break” would be superb, nor that it will bring a new
audience to pro surfing.
The latter will not happen overnight, but as the show gains
traction, so will competitions. I’m certain of that.
Why?
Because what I underestimated was how this show might
reinvigorate our enthusiasm for the game.
You, Us.
This jaded core of WSL critics who tune in regardless, as if
it’s some form of penance.
Of course there is something for you, Mr Fuck The WSL, even if
you just wish to extend your vitriol.
“Make or Break” will show you, as suspected, that sheer
ineptitude has prevented the general audience from appreciating the
rich tapestry of characters we have on the pro tour. The World Surf
League have failed spectacularly in this regard.
It’s akin to having a cellar full of chrysalises but locking the
door and losing the key.
“Make or Break” may not be to your personal tastes, but it is
absolutely the best depiction of pro surfing to date. You surely
recognise by now that the remaining naysayers are below the line,
or those who haven’t watched it.
I did a test. Instead of just watching it by myself, feeling I
might not be objective enough, beleaguered by pro surfing as I
sometimes am, I asked my other half to watch it with me. She
accepted, grudging and grumbling.
“How long is it?”
“Put it on now or I’m not watching. Like right now, Jamie, not
in five minutes.”
“I’ll watch one episode.”
Her patience was thin, enthusiasm thinner.
But three episodes later she’d changed her mind entirely.
It was a melding of her comfort zone and mine, sport and reality
TV. Not unlike when she made me sit down and watch an episode of
“Ru Paul’s Drag Race”.
“Oh my god, HOW do they make those outfits?!”
“She’s got to go, she’s such a bitch…”
Etc.
Well produced reality TV is captivating, even against your will
and common sense.
So, here’s what to expect from “Make or Break”.
Episode One
This is the least engaging episode, from our perspective at
least. The focus is Tyler Wright, but it doesn’t reveal much that
we didn’t know already.
Tyler is fine but not especially engaging to me. Her time on
camera seems self-conscious, too aware of what she’s saying. She’s
not been shy of having her voice heard in the past, of course, so
maybe there’s just an element of repetition.
She’s the kind of person who says “fuck” on record and it sounds
deliberate, or like they’re saying for the first time.
Her close friendship with Jessi Miley-Dyer was evident. Given
how often decisions about where and when the women will surf are in
a state of flux, I would think this should be questioned.
My other half (let’s call her Melanie since she has a name and
we’re looking at an episode dealing with the empowerment of women)
thought it was refreshing that the series not only began focusing
on the women, but it wasn’t in the vein of being sexually
objectiifed. Instead the focus was on the equality of waves.
Tyler’s period of absence is mentioned, but not with a depth
that reveals anything new. Post-viral fatigue leading to some
mental struggles, though this isn’t clearly stated beyond the
pictures of her kneeling in the shower that are familiar to us by
now.
She certainly looked very thin when she came back on Tour. I
hadn’t really appreciated the stark physical difference at the
time.
“Why is she always wearing the same pants?” Melanie asked.
“Would you not wear the same bikini two days in a row?”
“Not if it was stuck up my arse.”
Of course, now men and women surf the same waves at the same
times (sort of) but we see the shift that preceded this, the move
from Honolua Bay to Pipe for the conclusion of the women’s event
following the fatal shark attack.
On reflection, and in this context of this show it’s clear why
so many gaffes were made surrounding the women’s competition at
Pipe this year , amping up the history, saying they would surf when
they didn’t, then pretending they weren’t there.
Clearly the whole broadcast team, and especially JMD, were
conscious of the filming of “Make or Break” and the clear and
desired narrative at play. It seems obvious now that the decisions
and claims were driven by the ideals of this show, not the
competition at hand.
It’s clear from this first episode that the actual surfing will
have a bit part to play in the show as a whole. Footage of comps is
limited to a couple of waves from a couple of heats. I don’t think
this is a bad thing.
The surfing is shot like it’s a movie. We have stylised slo-mo.
Non-diegetic sounds of surfboards moving through water are added. I
don’t mind this. I’d be interested to know if they’ve shot any
surfing themselves or just relied on the WSL footage. I would
presume it’s an edited version of the latter.
We do have a slight revelation in episode one in that we see
into the ivory towers of the judges! This, for me, is truly
revelatory. When I think of the emotions (and indeed the money)
hung on decisions made inside this bubble, it seems borderline
scandalous that we’ve never actually been privy to the machinations
of what goes on here.
Seeing WSL Head Judge Pritamo Ahrendt’s face on the screen, as
an interview subject no less, was like coming across Santa Claus at
the foot of your stairs. (Though possibly on his way out of your
house with a sack full of valuables).
“I’ve watched pro surfing for years”, I said to Melanie, aghast,
“and I have never seen that man’s face until now.”
Decent, all in all, but not a patch on episode two…