Anthony Ruffo meth
Ruffo, in court, hears his sentence. | Photo: Rocky Romano

Watch: How Meth Ruined Santa Cruz!

The former Santa Cruz pro Anthony Ruffo and his life as a dealer of methamphetamine…

(Editor’s note: The documentary Learning to Breathe, a long-form film about the former Santa Cruz pro Anthony Ruffo and his life as a dealer of meth and how it ruined his community, costs $US7.99 to watch on iTunes. For the next 72 hours, it’s free to watch at BeachGrit.)

In an uncertain world there are few things you can count on. The sun will rise and set, the tides will come and go, and meth addicts will lie with every word.

Which is important to remember as you watch Learning to Breathe: From dealer to healer. A young addict is a pathetic thing, an old one dangerous. You don’t make a decades long career of inflicting pain on those around you, and still have them around you, without knowing how to smile sincerely. Say the words, shed those crocodile tears. Deflect blame, provide a handhold, some excuse to which they can cling.

And so when Anthony Ruffo states, at the beginning of the documentary on his addiction and supposed redemption, “When I say these things there’s no justification. I’m just telling you why,” it’s important to remember that he’s obviously spun, pupils dilated.

His words mean nothing. Ruffo’s tale is not that of a young man gone wrong, it’s that of an old man desperately seeking to dodge responsibility. 

Ruffo says he was not a gang member, he merely worked with them. He was not a violent man, others committed violence on his behalf. Every admission is followed by a but or because, as though reasons matter.

A young addict is a pathetic thing, an old one dangerous. You don’t make a decades long career of inflicting pain on those around you, and still have them around you, without knowing how to smile sincerely. Say the words, shed those crocodile tears. Deflect blame, provide a handhold, some excuse to which they can cling.

He gleefully recounts successfully flushing more than a pound of meth in the face of a police raid, claims, “We all know, man, when you get involved with drugs danger lurks all the time.” Which is not true. Danger lurks when you flip pounds, when you rob people, when you forego the protections of society and chase your wants like an animal.

Director Rocky Romano pieces together an interesting narrative, following Ruffo from his 2010 arrest to 2012 sentencing. Interviews with the Santa Cruz crew, through which addiction ran amok, are surprisingly forthright. Family members of Ruffo, and other local addicts, share an insight into how they deal with the agony of a loved one’s slow demise.

Unfortunately, that insight lays bare the desperate need to find reasons free of accountability. “Drugs” are personified. They ruin lives, lead us to make terrible choices. It’s understandable, forgivable, that need to cope, to justify. Necessary when seeking to sustain the love you want to feel for a person who is destroying themselves, and you.

His words mean nothing. Ruffo’s tale is not that of a young man gone wrong, it’s that of an old man desperately seeking to dodge responsibility. 

Ruffo says he was not a gang member, he merely worked with them. He was not a violent man, others committed violence on his behalf. Every admission is followed by a but or because, as though reasons matter.

Anthony Ruffo is a charismatic man, with a broad smile and confident gaze. The type of man who can make you believe the lie you know he’s telling. The type of man who believes the lies he’s telling. But the words of his prosecutor are true, “He’s not a victim, he has victimized.”

It’s the third act that left a sour taste in my mouth, wherein we watch Ruffo attend rehab in New York, then return to Santa Cruz to begin his good works. There are tears, and hand holding. Circle session bonding, declamations of change and rebirth and hope.

It’s poignant, nearly believable, if you’ve never been on the inside of a relationship with an addict. But if you have you already know, their words are hot air in chase of desire. Experts at disingenuous dissemination. A prudent man cares enough about himself to walk away in the beginning, leave the lost to their own devices.

We see Ruffo at his sentencing, handed a relatively light sentence in the context of his charges. Not that he gets off easy, a year of freedom lost is a heavy price. Most striking is the look on his face when he learns he’s going away. Utter confusion, total surprise, as though he really believed that a year of sobriety and decency could atone for a life of depravity.

“Why put that in a cage?” he asked The New York Times. “If I come into court a changed man from when I got busted and I’m showing these positive results, why wouldn’t you want to keep that person going in that direction?”

Because redemption is a myth, a get-out-of-jail free card handed out by a lord and savior who does not exist. In this world good deeds don’t undo bad, no one has a right to ask forgiveness. It can be given, and maybe should be, but to expect it demonstrates a near total lack of insight. Nothing unrings a bell. People may still love you, but they’d be fools to trust you.

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
101 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Jimmy Slade
Jimmy Slade
10 years ago

What’s the “Password Required”?

John Hansen
John Hansen
10 years ago
Reply to  Jimmy Slade

I thought this would be available for 72 hours? Please pass along the password.

Jimmy the Saint
Jimmy the Saint
10 years ago

Ah shit, looks like they took it down early, was intending on watching it this evening!

janeausten
janeausten
10 years ago

ok, here’s what you missed….world class surfer in the far ebb of his career substitutes meth for competitive success and predictably fucks over friends and family, gets fair and square busted then rehabs in New England with inexplicably rank accented female obese Australian counsellor in a programe that seems to be all about hyperventilation. Does a sick, flaring cutback on a brown water reform whilst rehabbing then returns to Santa Cruz to bring miracle cure to fragile fellow addicts and look better for sentencing. Gets 2 years and cuts a fine figure in prison Chinos. Seems a pretty good guy by the end.
All released, for some reason not related to post production quality, a few years after the events.
Cameo by Pete Mel makes it probably worth the $7.99 you’ll have to pay, depending on whether that’s USD or AUD.

Jimmy the Saint
Jimmy the Saint
10 years ago
Reply to  janeausten

Cheers Harry!

janeausten
janeausten
10 years ago

Oh, and crying, lots of crying, and they all wear hats, at all times, even at night and indoors

Ghostface Braddah
Ghostface Braddah
10 years ago
Reply to  janeausten

Such Bros.

Ghostface Braddah
Ghostface Braddah
10 years ago
Reply to  janeausten

Hammer. Nail. Bang.

janeausten
janeausten
10 years ago

Anything not to be in that community hall with the baby jiggler and the bogan, psychobabbling chancer and her incessant hugging.

Caveira raped by James B
Caveira raped by James B
10 years ago

Rory Parker must have lived the problem, cuz his words are so perfect. An addict is a Cripple spirit.

That Guy
That Guy
10 years ago

How bad was the song in the vid he made

NEGATRON
NEGATRON
10 years ago
Reply to  That Guy

Best part of the film…

Limbless Jack
Limbless Jack
10 years ago

Fuck that guy and all the other tweakers out in the line up in SC, I quit surfing for a year when I was there because of assholes like this guy

Loobs
Loobs
10 years ago

Apart from Mel everyone comes across like a self absorbed fuckin’ asshole.

PS: Do people in Santa Cruz realise no one outside of Santa Cruz gives a shit about how awesome they think they are?

PPS: The crocodile tears over AI. Gimme a fuckin’ break.

PPPS: Only redeeming part was the Addiction rap which may have been the greatest thing I’ve ever seen or heard. Was that MC Serch from 3rd Bass..?

Nick Dee
Nick Dee
10 years ago
Reply to  Loobs

This is just part of the on-going trend of monetizing these surf subcultures, the best example being the Bra Boys movie. Lol…they must have cleaned up financially. Knowing Maroubra Beach well myself, I also say: “Who gives a shit!” It was enough walking down to Maroubra Beach and seeing the broken glass and beer bottles everywhere after the Bra Boys had their afternoon of drinking. There appears nothing here to honor. Just a bunch of Santa Cruz ex-druggies in their on-going addiction to fame & easy money.

Brutus
Brutus
10 years ago
Reply to  Nick Dee

what a cynical view Nick , so you think the Bra boys defending their own ,against other gangs ,you only see $’s as their motivation and a claim to fame as the end result , and more $’s …ever watch ,The Crew??
its your word , honor, I see evolution of their lifestyles and becoming examples who help their fellow man ,

Nick Dee
Nick Dee
10 years ago
Reply to  Brutus

Don’t make me laugh Maurice. Maroubra is/was just your average family suburbia. The surfers at Maroubra were once individualistic, creative & eclectic; Davo, Larry Blair, Steven Wilson, Tony White, David Parkes, etc. You know these guys, they were nice people in the water and there were no overt gangs. The Bra Boys were a gang from the nearby housing commission who made their own trouble. Your average Maroubra person does not have much empathy for them, acting like they owned & policed the local family beach. I spent my whole youth at Maroubra and when I returned to visit from a long time away and was told about & saw this gang, I was incredulous. For many, they do not represent Maroubra. They only represent their sub-culture & self-generated violence.

Brutus
Brutus
10 years ago
Reply to  Nick Dee

so you think that Mark Mathews, Richie V etc who have cleaned up their act aren’t relevant to the Maroubra surf culture? go back before Davo,LB ,SW etc and the guys that were the so called heavies , who were just surfers , but some of the toughest guys in all of Australia . Sounds like your youth was on the outer , I have known the maroubra scene since the early seventies , remember tommy Moses , Mick W , and a host of other strong arm surfers. that what surfing was then….and how bout a fucken apology for calling me a dealer ….in public , what do you really know or make up?

Nick Dee
Nick Dee
10 years ago
Reply to  Brutus

Don’t know much about you. Maybe you should ask your mate to amend the Encyclopedia of Surfing, which states: “Cole won the 1972 Victoria state titles, one year before he started dealing drugs. In 1974 he was arrested for possession of hash oil, and in 1976 he was convicted and served just over two years in prison, with part of the time spent in a maximum security cell.”

Brutus
Brutus
10 years ago
Reply to  Nick Dee

now that’s interesting as I won the title in 73 , so theres the first mistake , the second is plain heresay …but hopefully the Encyclopedia of Surfing is based in the USA as I have grounds to sue there seppo arses…..as I am here now in the USA , could be my retirement fund…and yeah got the heaviest sentence ever in Australias history , still got the record for longest sentence ever , but no regrets …….I am checking the E of SH now.

Nick Dee
Nick Dee
10 years ago
Reply to  Brutus

OK. I will screen dump & save the EoS webpage for you before it is edited. Happy to be a court witness for you.

Brutus
Brutus
10 years ago
Reply to  Nick Dee

I have just dealt with it , and they either pull it down or ..where do I find you?

Nick Dee
Nick Dee
10 years ago
Reply to  Brutus

Find me at Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/ni… Make sure you screen dump the EoS page using the ‘PRT SC’ button on your computer. Nice chatting with you Maurice. I am glad surfing has blessed your life. I can hear INXS’s In Vain now and you waving and smiling at me (from Wizards of the Water). Regards.

Nick Dee
Nick Dee
10 years ago
Reply to  Nick Dee
Brutus
Brutus
10 years ago
Reply to  Nick Dee

Nick , we have lived very different lives , and I have probably had a few more ups and downs than most , that ‘s why I have empathy for those who really struggle and get branded as hopeless cases , and suffer mental illness’s as depression , and addiction. I my world there are no problems only solutions , I just had a great chat with Matt Warshaw who is responsible for the EOS , and set the record straight , so thank you for bringing up my past ,and what was written all good.

Nick Dee
Nick Dee
10 years ago
Reply to  Brutus

Yes. We have lived very different lives. You were/are an elite surfer & design genius; the full surfing professional, lifestyle & traveler. I was just a recreational surfer, a ‘nobody’ & like to watch internet surf competitions. I have never been part of surf culture. So, in this idle but occasionally beneficial internet chatter, I give my opinion on how I see it from ‘the outer’. Again, fun chatting with you. Regards.

Brutus
Brutus
10 years ago
Reply to  Nick Dee

I see your point and I guess you seem to understand mine , we are alla work in progress , pretty sad RP didn’t come on and back up his words , so no dramas Nick ,sometimes agreeing to disagree , brings out opinions and facts…but I disagree , that you are not a nobody!

Nick Dee
Nick Dee
10 years ago
Reply to  Brutus

I surfed Maroubra, regularly, the whole beach, for about 8 years, during the reign of those guys. There was little aggression at all. I once did an unintentional dangerous drop-in on Davo; no sweat, he knew my face as regular; not a word said. Once SW dropped in on me on a late take-off. My eyes cleared to see a a great vision of a beautiful bottom turn. I was stoked because he was cool. As for the older “enforcers”, too young to know them; never noticed them.

Nick Dee
Nick Dee
10 years ago
Reply to  Brutus

Mark Mathews, Richie V, the guys in the latest self-promotion movie? Not interested. Maroubra is not their culture. Maroubra is a family beach in the city that is mostly undeveloped & therefore remains a tranquil respite from the city. I mostly surfed alone there, very often. Clocked up so many hours at Maroubra. Never been hassled ever. Still visit occasionally and bump into old friends. It is they who are on the ‘outer’ since most people at Maroubra don’t give hoot about them. They don’t own Maroubra like they believe they own “Ours”. Your posts only highlight the ‘localism delusion’ in the mind of small packs of surfers who believe they own beaches. Yet you talk like they are charity workers, even though they claim to own & police a public beach. Oh the mythology & self-promotion.

Brutus
Brutus
10 years ago
Reply to  Nick Dee

so you are maroubra’s culture , now I get it, no-one owns beaches , but custodianship is a valid claim. you surf alone , visit sometimes and you are an expert and don’t have the balls to correct what you said about me ,credibility is certainly not one of good points , maybe you could make up more crap to support your delusional thoughts on what a maroubra local is?

Nick Dee
Nick Dee
10 years ago
Reply to  Brutus

“Custodianship”. LOL. As a teenager, when the surf was on, I was often the 1st out and often surfed banks alone. One of the last times I surfed there, back in the late 80s, at the North End ‘coliseum’, was 1st out on an 8′ day while the early birds were just watching. That session, not more than 10 guys, despite being offshore all morning. The myths you are peddling is what a group of clique surfers think about themselves. I am a free spirit. I have never identified myself with being a surfer. I am just saying Maroubra is a beach used by many surfers & beachgoers. It is a city beach with people from everywhere. If you want to define Maroubra by the surfing club at the Nth End of the beach, you can. Does not change what Maroubra is to me, which is place I spent so much time getting wet without even knowing the Bra Boys.

Nick Dee
Nick Dee
10 years ago
Reply to  Brutus

You see, for me, surfing is an activity with the ocean rather than an activity performed for the sake of social approval. You think my love & gratitude towards Maroubra Beach must include the Bra Boys?

Brutus
Brutus
10 years ago
Reply to  Nick Dee

I see it as a culture , simple !

Captain Clark
Captain Clark
10 years ago

A prudent man doesn’t walk away, that’s no real man. A real man shows compasion, love, and understanding. I’m not saying this guy doesn’t deserve the consequences of his actions, but I do think people who show real change deserve a second chance. You speak of apparent drug use in your write ups, does this in someway justify your pot and pill use? Kinda sounds like the pot calling the kettle black to me.

Trogan Fan
Trogan Fan
10 years ago
Reply to  Captain Clark

drug use and massive drug dealing aren’t the same. drug addicts aren’t bad people. meth dealers moving pounds at a time are.

Brutus
Brutus
10 years ago
Reply to  Trogan Fan

So what are you proposing a death sentence and that no-one can be rehabilitated?

Trogan Fan
Trogan Fan
10 years ago
Reply to  Brutus

nope. Rehab is fine. That doesn’t mean anyone needs to forgive or forget. We all live with our mistakes. He was a fuck up for a good part of two decades. You don’t just walk back in the room 30 days later and say “yeah, sorry about that, let’s surf.”

Brutus
Brutus
10 years ago
Reply to  Trogan Fan

his way of saying sorry was to help individuals and he is still doing it years later….

Svetlana Boginskaya
Svetlana Boginskaya
10 years ago

What’s with the VO guy in this? Jeez.
Drug dealers are basically murderers, so Ruffo getting one year is a joke.
Epic cameo Pete Mel. I wonder what Mr. Brokeback thinks of you bringing back this classic.

Brutus
Brutus
10 years ago

Rory ,your article smacks of you being a self righteous judgmental prick with no hope , no love, no forgiveness , and that you make a mistake, and nothing can you can do will ever erase a mistake. You must really hate people like Tom Carrol Ruffo Petee mel , I have a list longer than both your arms that have been to the darkside , come back and become better people Ruffo is now surfing and helping addicts as is Tom and so many other people who have been to a dark side , and seen the light .yeah it is possible , I am one of those fucked up people you are so happy to judge and sentence to a life of solitude in that no-one should trust you , believe in you let alone love you . ., take a good hard look at yourself because it seem you are writing about yourself , an empty cynical bitch , home alone in empty world , with your drugs and woman you seem so fond of and seemingly joke , that she like rooting other blokes….while you root anything that bends over…..a soulless secular specimen for all to see…….read the following and replace achoholic with addict…

Open Letter from the Alcoholic

I am an alcoholic. I need your help.

Don’t lecture, blame or scold me. You wouldn’t be angry with me for having cancer or diabetes. Alcoholism is a disease, too.

Don’t pour out my liquor; it’s just a waste because I can always find ways of getting more.

Don’t let me provoke your anger. If you attack me verbally or physically, you will only confirm my bad opinion abut myself. I hate myself enough already.

Don’t let your love and anxiety for me lead you into doing what I ought to do for myself. If you assume my responsibilities, you make my failure to assume them permanent. My sense of guilt will be increased, and you will feel resentful.

Don’t accept my promises. I’ll promise anything to get off the hook. But the nature of my illness prevents me from keeping my promises, even though I mean them at the time.

Don’t make empty threats. Once you have made a decision, stick to it.

Don’t believe everything I tell you; it may be a lie. Denial of reality is a symptom of my illness. Moreover, I’m likely to lose respect for those I can fool too easily.

Don’t let me take advantage of you or exploit you in any way. Love cannot exist for long without the dimension of justice.

Don’t cover up for me or try in any way to spare me the consequences of my drinking. Don’t lie for me, pay my bills, or meet my obligations. It may avert or reduce the very crisis that would prompt me to seek help. I can continue to deny that I have a drinking problem as long as you provide an automatic escape for the consequences of my drinking.

Above all, do learn all you can about alcoholism and your role in relation to me. Go to open AA meetings when you can. Attend Al-Anon meetings regularly, read the literature and keep in touch with Al-Anon members. They’re the people who can help you see the whole situation clearly.

I love you.

Your Alcoholic

Trogan Fan
Trogan Fan
10 years ago
Reply to  Brutus

“a mistake” is running a red light. people make mistakes. shitty people sell meth for 15 years, bring gangs into their town and help people die. There’s a difference, and it’s large.

Brutus
Brutus
10 years ago
Reply to  Trogan Fan

without the demand there is no need for dealers . the culture in SC was all about being rad/mad and charging extreme waves, extremists , its happened everywhere in surfing including Australia , if people knew the end result it would be a different debate . Being self righteous , is sad, as when you have been involved and seen the deaths/breakdowns families destroyed , its truly amazing to see people get out from under the dark side and then work to stop further abuses. That’s the difference!

Trogan Fan
Trogan Fan
10 years ago
Reply to  Brutus

demand is irrelevant. He made many, many “mistakes” on the way to being the guy he ended up being. Many people abuse drugs and alcohol, not many end up in the spot he was in.

Brutus
Brutus
10 years ago
Reply to  Trogan Fan

the guy he ended up being is someone , who is part of the solution. When users are dealers its a very different mistake to someone who is a non-user and just only making $’s!

Nick Dee
Nick Dee
10 years ago
Reply to  Brutus

“without the demand there is no need for dealers”…i call bullshit. drugs are generally first offered to individuals by their friends, so individuals often first do drugs when trusting in their friends. the drugs are acquired from dealers. when i was 14yo, some boys at the beach acquired a bag of mull for $30 and it was my first try at my friends place. i was never ever looking for or demanding drugs. the drugs just appeared. from there, i smoked mull for the next 7 years. however, i was smart & aware enough to know mull was relatively harmless for me; but not for friends i introduced it to; they became full-blown potheads. as for harder drugs friends & ladies offered me, i was smart enough to never touch them. drug dealers supply people who then offer drugs to their trusting friends. its not really a matter of demand but of habits developed via trusted friends & perceived social norms. the reality is not ‘demand’ seeking ‘suppliers’. it is suppliers creating demand via social networks.

Brutus
Brutus
10 years ago
Reply to  Nick Dee

so you were forced to smoke pot? did the dealer hold you down and force you? No you had a choice , and YOU smoked it . but you still blame the dealer or is it your mates that bought the bag??

Nick Dee
Nick Dee
10 years ago
Reply to  Brutus

not blaming the dealer at all. merely pointing out the dealer supplies a society where the majority of people are not actually searching for drugs.

Brutus
Brutus
10 years ago
Reply to  Nick Dee

Huh ? the majority of people are not searching for drugs but when they find them they take them ….so ah the dealer comes into their home or..?? How many people in Australia drink alcohol , ah the majority …..everyone has a choice on whether to buy and take drugs , the dealer is just a vendor!

Nick Dee
Nick Dee
10 years ago
Reply to  Brutus

People are by nature curious therefore they will try drugs when drugs suddenly appear before them. However, they will generally not actively search for drugs The very fact that people are generally like this is why the advertising industry is so vast & so effective because it pushes goods & services onto people that do not intrinsically need or want those goods & services. Then once people become “addicted” to those things, it is very difficult to give them up. You claim in one of your posts to be a victim of drugs yet are now pushing the idea that people have free-will. People generally do not have strong free-will since they lack perfect knowledge. Thus they are generally very easily influenced & lead into drug taking using drugs that have been supplied to friends by dealers.

Brutus
Brutus
10 years ago
Reply to  Nick Dee

this is getting too confusing , I have never been a victim of drugs I have always had a choice , yes or no , that’s freewill. WTF does perfect knowledge mean ?

Nick Dee
Nick Dee
10 years ago
Reply to  Brutus

‘Perfect knowledge’ means you know the consequences of an action or activity. If you really knew beforehand, with perfect knowledge, that addiction would occur & how difficult it would be to overcome then you would have never started using the drug in the 1st place. It is because people lack perfect knowledge, i.e., are curious, naive &/or innocent, that they become addicted & get into trouble.

Nick Dee
Nick Dee
10 years ago
Reply to  Brutus

A simple example is the story of MP. According to Rabbit’s & MP’s bio, the police cleaned up the ganja on the Gold Coast, only to be replaced by the CIA-heroin from SE Asia. If there was no supply, MP obviously would have never used heroin. Our local drug dealers are the end point of a big supply chain. The USA went to war in Afghanistan, found no Al Qaeda there, but immediately restarted the opium production there and have been there ever since, fighting a group called the Taliban the USA itself created years before, who were unrelated to 9/11. The local drug dealer is the end point of this drug supply; from the CIA to the Gold Coast pub; from the CIA-Contras in Columbia to your local coke dealer.

Brutus
Brutus
10 years ago
Reply to  Nick Dee

So if there was never drug s everything would be OK? So who is the more guilty the manufacturer , the dealer or the user?

Nick Dee
Nick Dee
10 years ago
Reply to  Brutus

If I am a mad scientist and I am deliberately creating a drug in the hope it will heavily addict people then obviously I am more guilty since my intention is to create a drug that will harm millions of people. If I am a user I am guilty of harming only myself. My guilt pertains to only one person. So the drug creator is 1 million times more guilty than the single drug user because the creator has harmed 1 million times more people. In reality, people or individuals are not guilty because the real culprit is ignorance. If ‘ignorance’ is blamed for the problem that is more calm, peaceful, helpful & healing. Addictions are caused by ignorance.

Brutus
Brutus
10 years ago
Reply to  Nick Dee

Addictions can also be a sign of mental illness.

Mariano Landa
Mariano Landa
10 years ago
Reply to  Brutus

Pretty sure that spending too much time on the internet is a sign of mental illness, too.

Anon Ymous
Anon Ymous
10 years ago
Reply to  Nick Dee

Im with you on this. The same question applied to surfing… How did you get in to the sport? My buddy lent me a board is the answer. Every credit goes to the buddy so why shouldnt the blame in a negative situation. We arent questioning the choice. Were asking the source. Like he said he was never looking to get high. High just came along with a buddy. The dealers are the problem.

NEGATRON
NEGATRON
10 years ago
Reply to  Brutus

Not a fan of the “alcoholism is a disease” angle. You cant pop down to the local bottle store and buy a dozen cancer cells and a bottle of diabetes…

Brutus
Brutus
10 years ago
Reply to  NEGATRON

so in your world there is no such thing as mental disease???

NEGATRON
NEGATRON
10 years ago
Reply to  Brutus

Its an insult to people who have died of a terminal illness to compare an alcoholic to someone with cancer.

One of the first steps after rock bottom for an alcoholic, is to make the choice to dry out. Cancer patients don’t have that luxury.

I understand the process to recovery and hats off to those who grab onto each step. But you need to own that shit first, if you want to get well.

Brutus
Brutus
10 years ago
Reply to  NEGATRON

How many people die from mental disease , how many kids suicide , alcoholic drug addict , same thing ,there is no insult to people with terminal illness’s , as so many addicts are terminal also

Nick Dee
Nick Dee
10 years ago
Reply to  Brutus

When I posted frankly elsewhere a certain world champ had a ‘disease’, you & your mates came for my throat. There is a big $urfing indu$try out there, which is all about $$$$ and $$$$, thus about protecting public image. When they do good, we must praise them like gods. When they do bad, we must forgive them as being mere imperfect humans. These Santa Cruz meth heads are simply a bunch a ferals that by coincidence can also surf well. Who cares.

Brutus
Brutus
10 years ago
Reply to  Nick Dee

pretty obvious Nick you don’t care , even though those SC Meth heads are actually a pretty hardcore surf crew , hmm ferals ….surf culture , and I care because they turned it around , and given hope to others!

Suss Oldman
Suss Oldman
10 years ago
Reply to  Brutus

The misunderstanding here is that the truly humble recovering alcoholic/addict will not get all pedantic on the people whose lives he/she has affected. Without that humility the chances of losing recovery are slim. A central tenet of the disease of addiction is a blinding self-centered fear, which drives people to behave in ways that are horribly destructive to themselves and many around them. True recovery involves humbly accepting whatever reaction the affected people want to take and to ask where amends to the relationship might be made.

Asking or expecting people to get it or work to make space for your weird behavior is just more ego-fueled responsibility skirting and it is of no help to the addict.

Source: I’m 24 years sober off meth, coke, and alcohol abuse, bottomed out in Santa Cruz, and have worked as an individual and group therapist with addicts for 8 years.

Brutus
Brutus
10 years ago
Reply to  Suss Oldman

now you are a person I would like to meet and learn from.

Suss Oldman
Suss Oldman
10 years ago
Reply to  Brutus

Well that’s lucky because same here. I’ll trade you addiction knowledge for a solid understanding of rolled vee!

Nick Dee
Nick Dee
10 years ago
Reply to  Brutus

I recall reading Nat’s big surfing book years ago, where he seemed to proudly gloat about surfers involvement in drug shipping & dealing. Hackman got busted. What brings us all here together is love of the ocean & surf. The big question is: “Why are so many surfers druggies?” “Isn’t the joy & calm of the ocean enough for them?” ????

Brutus
Brutus
10 years ago
Reply to  Nick Dee

nick I was busted for possession , anybody who has ever bought an ounce and split and ounce with their friends can be considered a dealer. the era of the 60’s/70’s was pretty wild, anti-establishment and the experimentation in all art forms has been documented , as a time of rebellion and questioning of the status quo…..I am not sure so many surfers are druggies , unless you count alcohol , which is one of the most dangerous of all , well maybe meth too…….joy and calm of the ocean,hmmm……do you count crowds into that equation?

Nick Dee
Nick Dee
10 years ago
Reply to  Brutus

The following rate among the best surfers of all time: (1) the hard druggies: Butch, Hackman, MP, Buttons, TC, Occy, Archy, AI, to name only a few; and (2) the non-druggies: Shaun, MR, Kelly. If I named my top 9 short board surfers, I guess the majority (except two) are druggies: KS, WL, MP, GL, ST, TC, AI, TC, Occ. I would speculate by your rant about Maroubra & Localism that many great surfers have an addictive genotype, which is why they become great surfers and also fall into drug use & delusions about the ownership of the public ocean & beaches.

Brutus
Brutus
10 years ago
Reply to  Nick Dee

How do you pick a minority group of maybe non-druggies surfers , like 1% , and then say that the majority have an addictive genotype and have delusions about ownerships of beaches?? oh stop being silly!!

Nick Dee
Nick Dee
10 years ago
Reply to  Brutus

lol

Mariano Landa
Mariano Landa
10 years ago
Reply to  Brutus

What are you drinking right now?

longtom
longtom
10 years ago

he looks like mini-me in the dock

Fahking Haole
Fahking Haole
10 years ago

Good film. Decent meth-od acting by P Mel…

longtom
longtom
10 years ago
Reply to  Fahking Haole

hahahaha

funky Gibbon
funky Gibbon
10 years ago

I actually think in Santa Cruz’s case surfing is the problem… all these fuck ups surf and are or where pros so the groms grow up idolising them and one thing leads to another and the rotation continues.

Nickeola HI CrackHead
Nickeola HI CrackHead
10 years ago

Meth is for pussies !

Trogan Fan
Trogan Fan
10 years ago

Fucking fuck. How shit was that “addiction” rap? How have I not heard that before? I feel no sorrow for Ruffo or any of the others. None.

Bunbo
Bunbo
10 years ago

Sounds like someone has had a negative experience with an addict in his life?

Your writing on the subject is impassioned (and well-aware of manipulative addict behavior), but also somewhat limited by your personal bias.

That said, Ruffo is a scumbag. He also used to bang my cousin in high school.

longtom
longtom
10 years ago
Reply to  Bunbo

beware a writer who claims an “objective” viewpoint.

Audit In Progress
Audit In Progress
10 years ago
Reply to  Bunbo

Hey Al, if you aren’t dropping “cocksuckers” left and right, I’m not gonna believe it’s you, ya hooplehead.

Bob Dobalina
Bob Dobalina
10 years ago

Ruffo surfs the lane just about every day. Works water patrol with Flea for every event

Trogan Fan
Trogan Fan
10 years ago
Reply to  Bob Dobalina

that’ll go well until it doesn’t.

NEGATRON
NEGATRON
10 years ago

I like Peter Mel even more now.

Nick Dee
Nick Dee
10 years ago
Reply to  NEGATRON

The ex-meth head that uncontrollably loses his temper in the WSL broadcasts?

Liam
Liam
10 years ago

This is a lawsuit waiting to happen. Other than that, great watch – people incriminating themselves like they aren’t on camera is always good. Peter Mel must be super excited about his 5 year ago self.

Bob Dobalina
Bob Dobalina
10 years ago

Bad men are capable of good things just as often as the opposite.

bitter guy
bitter guy
10 years ago
Reply to  Bob Dobalina

upvote from Bonita Applebaum


101
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x