Episode of JOB infuriates environmentalists! Panics Red Bull!
I doubt if there’s anything funnier than watching a big company go into panic mode because of some kinda “controversial” content creating a ruckus. All those managers, fearful of losing their sixty-k-a-year salaries, twitching and gasping like fish on the deck of a boat as they shift blame further and further down the hierarchical ladder.
Therefore, I can picture the frenzied scene at Red Bull over the last few days when it was reported that Jamie O’Brien had possibly used a gasoline accelerant for one of his Who is JOB stunts in a “sensitive watershed” in British Colombia.
In the latest episode of Who is JOB, which has since been pulled from YouTube, “the video features a scene where stunts are performed over a log sticking out of Kennedy Lake,” reports BC Local News. “The log is set on fire and online commenters quickly accused the troupe of pouring gasoline to set the blaze… Ministry of Environment spokesperson David Karn told the Westerly the B.C. Conservation Officer Service is looking into the situation.
‘The complaint was submitted via the RAPP [Report All Poachers and Polluters] line, and will be considered by the CO as to whether it warrants investigation,’ Karn said.
“While the video does not show any flame accelerants, Tofino local Josh Temple told the Westerly News he is ‘100 per cent” positive that petroleum products were used. ‘I’ve spoken with several of the people that were actually there,” he said. ‘No ifs ands or buts; it was gasoline.'”
In the story, Temple said he, “immediately reported the video to the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada as well as B.C.’s Ministry of Environment. ‘I want to see a full investigation,’ he said. I want to see a public apology from Red Bull and Jamie O’Brien and I want to see them come to the table with some sort of restitution and a way to make this right.
“Temple said ignorance would not be an acceptable excuse from either the company or O’Brien. ‘You can’t tell me that they didn’t know what they were doing was wrong,’ he said. ‘You can’t tell me that somebody is going to say straight faced that they thought taking petroleum products, dumping them into a pristine wilderness environment and lighting them on fire was a good idea and that it would be okay for the environment. You can’t tell me that. So, obviously, they’re not thinking about it or, worst-case scenario, they were thinking about it and just didn’t care.’
Do you think Red Bull, who sold five-point-three billion cans of its sugar-filled caffeine drink in 2013 cares and it was simply the wilful behaviour of Jamie O’Brien? Or was JOB instructed by his Austrian masters to poison the BC wilderness?
Option C, none of the above.
5 seconds on a Google search about Tofino pollutants..they dump raw sewage into the watershed. Not saying gasoline is great, but it beats straight turds..I’m sure the 3 agencies mentioned above will get right on that…Oooo! Canadaaa!
http://www.bucksuzuki.org/k…
no excuse. this idiot lives in hawaii and isn’t that their biggest beef with tourists? polluting, ruining the land yada yada yada ..fuck off
who was their fixer? they had some local mountain bike dude showing them around. generally, if you can dump a jet ski in the watershed, its not that environmentally sensitive.
I want to see the whole production on fire. Jet ski, ski rope, camera man, everything. On. Fire.
Wakeskating behind a good jet ski is fun as shit, and watching those guys trying to rail slide a shitty log on a soft top in freezing water was pretty funny. But lighting it on fire thinking it would make the footage better was just plain stupid. Nice work schwag-bull
Why take it down? They should keep it up to really piss people off, great for marketing…
JOB is just gonna shuffle this down the line to .86 k per year factotum of the fecal
When does JOB finally immolate Poopies on film? Because we all know it’s coming.
Did anyone else have this come up on their screen?
No just another millionaire housewife.
Well played Monster