Clever matrix determines your ability level!
Surfing has an odd way of cutting into your bones and menacing your well-being. One day you’re king of the hill, debonair as anything on each wave and close to complete mastery; the next your legs refuse to unfold upon lift-off and your feet feel as if they belong to a different man.
From plans of surfing until your death-bed to dismal thoughts of giving the game away. Surfing I love but you’re bringing me down and so on.
So if we all perform at dramatically different levels from one surf to the next, how can we definitely say we’re a kook or, say, a competent amateur?
I remember once, years ago, having played a sweet hot jazz on a few waves in a row, believing that the learning days were over. That I’d secured my rung as a gifted surfer.
The next day, of course, I surfed abominably. And the next etc.
Am I a kook or a competent amateur? Depends on who you ask.
While scrolling through the Wikipedia entry on Surfing today I came across a helpful matrix that identifies “Surfer Skill Level” as applied to “Wave Type.”
It makes a fascinating study.
For instance, a competent surfer rides waves with a “peel angle” of forty to fifty degrees, with heights of up to three metres and “section speeds” of twenty clicks. The waves I should enjoy, if I am indeed a competent amateur, would be Kirra and Burleigh Heads.
The “Top Amateur”, with his ability to ride a thirty-degree wave, can apply for sets at Bingin and Padang in Bali.
The beginner? He, and she, necessarily, must never venture beyond waves with an aspect of seventy degrees. He (she etc) should live in Atlantic Beach, Florida.
Where do you squeeze in? Top Amateur? Top World Surfer?
Or are you one of those Intermediates who surfs Bells Beach or New Zealand?

Commented on Disqus? Log out, tap the Disqus button, and your old name and comments come back. The box is ours.
Your comments are still here. Every one of them.
Twelve years of BeachGrit comments came across from Disqus. Connect and we will show you how many are yours. We get your username, nothing else.
Connect Disqus to reveal.
‘Self-entitled clueless novice’ being pushed into wave by Balinese bloke from somewhere else on the island.
I’m from Arizona, if that’s what you mean? – Rick
I got “king of the donkeys” didn’t even see that listed.
Are you guys all down on this matrix because Keanu isn’t in it or because I qualify as a ‘top amateur’ by virtue of being, for a brief 2 week run, the King of Bingin in the early 90s?
Who wants to be the king of Bingin when you could be king of bin juice? https://uploads.disquscdn.c…
Bin_Chook!
Peel angle? Is that the angle kooks look at me when I’m flying down the line, deep and steep?
When I googled “peel angle”, the results were graphically savant. Not in some vertically challenged Hector Santamaria sort of way. I feel bad about myself for unknowingly complimenting kooks by calling them “fucking Amateurs”. No wonder their conduct never ceased, I was encouraging them.
My google search did find this graph below. I don’t know what any of the words are saying but the arrows clearly showed where Surfstitch sits on the Peel Angle graph. Looks like they’re just about completely peeled such that no further peeling apart may be possible. Or, if so, at such effort that its not worth the trouble. Fucking peeled. Fucking done.
Their cohesion to peel ratio wound around the little squiggly thing numeral divided by force looks devastating.
https://uploads.disquscdn.c…
Is this perhaps more relevant?
https://uploads.disquscdn.c…
Only relevant in the sense that you took my Surfstitch slight so personally that it has the stench of you being one of the Surfstitch owner fucks
Wooo. Sorry dude. I wasn’t even really paying attention to the Surfstich part. And nope, no shares for me.
That’s John Peel (RIP) one of the most amazing radio DJ’s ever.
‘Peel Angle’ – John Peel at an angle – see? It’s like, a visual joke.
Had a run a the start of the year where my surfing was on fire, improving beyond my belief, could do no wrong. Then happened by chance to be in the margies area while the comp was on. Turned up to a semi secret little break where a handful of pros were out. First wave went straight over the falls and snapped my board, in front of everyone. Surfing has been on a steady downward spiral since. At this rate I may as well give up and take up stand up goat boating.
In San Clemente there is a homeless dude who surfs Lowers and Salt Creek. The dude rips, is completely insane, and occasionally surfs naked. Both spots produce some limp dick surf, but does the nudity up the peel angle?
Yes, it does… unless he’s uncircumsized?… I really need to quit ellipses… I bottomturn around the Whitewater Scandal straight into a power gaucho off the ellipses… with this nonsense I have reached the Ralph Nader of commenting…
No fuck that… why quit… “it’s like ankle weights for your lungs”… that’s what papi used to say…
You’d have to get bonus points for a dusk solo session at Lighthouse Beach Ballina right?
Bonus points for being a kook!
Pussy
Fuck, forgot my roofing square and tape measure again. How will I ever know how shit I am?
try seeing how shit you pm.
relativity
That chart is interesting.
Apparently ‘Intermediate’ surfers ride waves of 255 m high.
Front or back measurement I wonder?
Also: does anyone know of any surf-inclinometer manufacturers? FCS? Daa Kine?
I wish I could insert a depressed emoji to express myself right now
OK what kind of monstrous cocksucker dreamed up this shit. I mean really, “section length: metres”. Own up to it whoever you are, so I can drop in on you.
CerealZ. Actually the last time I took a protractor out to measure the peel angle, I think you dropped in on me.
if you surf Cloudy, Teahupoo and Winky and you’re connected to Slater and you can surf better than girls then you’re a red hot surfer, imo.
Connected to slater? Wanker imo
New Zealand at low tide though?