The New Yorker: “Mikey February’s style is
as self-conscious as the duck-face selfie!”
By surf ads
Jamie Brisick observes "how the omnipresent camera
has affected surf style…"
There’s a scene in David Egger’s dystopian novel
The Circle where an
exec from a fictional Bay area tech giant is pitching a new
gadget to his adoring disciples.
It’s a Steve Jobs trope. Ear mic. Black skivvy. The whole
show.
But he’s also a surfer, and his breakthrough innovation is a
pocket-sized, mass- produced camera that can be placed on any beach
to live stream surf conditions. You can keep it as your personal
feed. Or you can hook it into the network of millions of others of
cameras
It’s the ultimate surf cam. Nowhere needs to be secret,
anymore.
Of course, like any good sci-fi, curly questions are posed about
omnipotent technology, the public’s right to know vs the
individual’s right to privacy etc
But the thing is, this sorta tech is already here.
The writer and former pro Jamie Brisick has written a story in
The New Yorker, and published today, riffing on this
very topic.
He opens his scene with a new VAL toy called Surfline
Sessions™. It’s an app that recognises
subscribers and records their every wave, if it’s in front of a
Surfline camera. You can have your videos cut and ready waiting for
you by the time you get back to your car to dry off.
The video guy for the everyman.
I saw another one recently that is a camera you leave recording
on the beach that follows you around the surf using a GPS
tracker.
Never miss a wave, anywhere, anytime.
On Mikey February: “His hand jive, soul arches, and
toreador-like flourishes play to the camera in a way that breaks
the spell of the itinerant surfer in far-flung solitude. His style
is as self-conscious as the duck-face selfie.”
It all makes for great marketing hooks. But isn’t also sorta
fucken …lame?
I quoted Parmenter recently when he said surfing is the ultimate
selfie sport.
In The New Yorker, Brisick takes it further.
On Mikey February:
“His hand jive, soul arches, and toreador-like flourishes play
to the camera in a way that breaks the spell of the itinerant
surfer in far-flung solitude. His style is as self-conscious as the
duck-face selfie.”
He then quotes Slater.
“Style should be natural, and not perfect. I really dislike
watching someone, anyone, who seems to be trying to look a certain
way.”
Is it true style when it’s just for the camera?
Even Al Knost’s biggest fan would say no. (Though I’ll still
watch him and Feb errrr’ damn day)
But what if constant recording can help you improve your
surfing?
Is it still narcissistic then?
Already, surf dads sit for hours on beach capturing their kid’s
every move for feedback. Surfing Australia do adult camps out of
their Cabarita high tower “for all levels of surfer”.
Even I did it recently with our Ments trip photog. It was the
first time I’ve seen proper video of myself surfing. It wasn’t
pretty.
But it did help me pick up on a few things I already felt I
might be doing wrong. I’m not about to go and hire Martin Dunn to
follow me around with a drone and a clipboard. But I will open my
shoulders a little more through top turns.
Surely that’s not a core crime?
Anyway, all argument is academic at this point. The future is
already here. In Egger’s Circle, the tech bro’s grand reveal is
that his cameras aren’t just capturing surfing. They’re also in
Gaza, and Chechnya, and inside politicians offices.
It’s full transparency, whether we like it or not.
The revolution will be televised.
And it can help you with your roundhouse cutties.
Loading comments...
Load Comments
0
Question: Do “Ocean Surfers” need to
readjust concept of wave-size to fit pool VALS?
By Derek Rielly
Does the Pool Era fill you with joy or an
existential terror that your entire surfing life is a house of
cards?
A little turbulence a week or whatever it was ago when
Surf Lakes presented a prone bodyboarder on a four-foot
wave and claimed it as the world’s first artificially
created eight-footer.
Arguments for the validity of the size revolved around two
positions: Surf Lakes’ transparency that it was the wave face being
measured and therefore wasn’t beholden to archaic, culturally
entrenched sizing, and it didn’t matter, anyway, ’cause the wave
looked pretty wild.
That night I lay alone in the dark rear bedroom of my rental and
my thoughts swung to the Pool Era, which we’ve just entered.
I doubt if many appreciate just how much surfing is going to
change, and how quickly.
Already, little girls are doing airs beyond the capability of
female world champions and ten-year-old boys with falsetto voices
are mixing combos the sort only Reynolds or Not Deane might dream
up.
The thing with pools is they’re pitched at VALs. Yeah,
there’s an “expert” wave, but the money that keeps the pool alive
comes from VALs on softboards and plastic double-enders.
And a VAL, if she
reads the promotional literature and sees the advertised max size
as four foot, why, she would fall on the floor laughing.
So small!
A wave barely the size of two toilet brushes stacked end to
end!
Soon, with the creation of that new spawn, the Pool Surfer,
there’ll grow a new language, new boards, new moves and new ways of
measuring waves.
An Ocean Surfer will visit a tank and be schooled by the local
hot-shot riding switch inside his eight-foot tube.
He’ll be hectored by a mom running up beside him in the lineup
telling him it’s her kid’s turn on the next wave.
He’ll watch as every advantage he had, the ability to study
rips, channels, time sets and so on, disappear; his once proud
athletic stride a stooped shuffle.
Let me wonder
aloud.
Do we need to adjust our concept of wave size?
Of what a surfer is?
And do you fear the Pool Era? Or do you believe that pools will
set free your inner power and strength and let you achieve,
finally, the glory of your surfing?
I’m the latter.
Loading comments...
Load Comments
0
Comment Live: Day 3, Tahiti Pro Teahupoo
presented by Hurley!
By Chas Smith
Come to the end of the road!
It was Sunday morning in America, yesterday,
and the last hours of summer with nothing to do but luxuriate. It
was a gorgeous day in southern California, sun shining and hot,
some small but fun waves on tap. No major sporting events on
television as we’re still a week away from the start of college
football, two weeks away from the National Football League, but
there was day 2 of the Tahiti Pro Teahupoo presented by Hurley on
the computer and I imagined it would do very well, airing in the
wheelhouse of typical American sport consumption with no
competition elsewhere.
I flipped it on and watched for a few moments, a smattering of
minutes, but couldn’t really get engaged. The surf looked fine,
interesting enough, and there were some fine enough storylines but…
my mind wandered and then I received a revelation.
Is professional surf watching only tolerable when sitting under
fluorescent lighting in a cubicle, on an interminably long road
trip, when there are pressing chores to do but unpleasant chores
like putting fitted sheets onto beds etc? Or must there be some
other event happening, another televised game or some such, to have
on concurrently with professional surfing running in the
background?
The interactions on our patented “comment live” feed were slim
and I had the distinct feeling that no one was really watching
anywhere because, again, it was a glorious day in southern
California and probably the rest of the United States from the
looks of it.
Well, I don’t know that the contest will run today but I am out
early and, as you know by now, would rather wear the shame of
posting our Tahiti Pro Teahupoo presented by Hurley without it
running rather than wear the shame of not posting it and it
running.
Also, today is a work day. Enjoy the slightly better alternative
to your job.
Loading comments...
Load Comments
0
"It would be somewhere between hard and
impossible to catalog all the bad choices Marvin Foster made in his
relatively short life. You'll find a few specifics near the end of
this post, and Foster himself weighs in here. For the moment let's
just say that Marvin had a good side, a big heart, was friendly at
times to people he didn't know and talked openly and often about
his love for family — but he also crossed a lot of lines, hurt a
lot of people, and at the very least was a heavy and often
threatening surf world presence." Marvin Foster by Tom
Servais
Warshaw on: Marvin Foster as Tarantino
anti-hero; the rape of Hawaii and “stomping haoles”!
By Matt Warshaw
Why the late, great, wild, bad and mad Hawaiian
surfer Marvin Foster is a Tarantino movie waiting to happen…
(Editor’s note: If you’re a subscriber
to Matt Warshaw’s
Encyclopedia of Surfing, which costs three dollars a
month with a twenty percent discount if you take it over a year,
your Sundays will be gifted with a long email from Warshaw himself. Today’s piece
is about the Hawaiian surfer Marvin Foster, who dazzled at Pipe in
the eighties and nineties, ran various criminal rackets, competed
in the 1995 Eddie while on the run from the cops and who hanged
himself in 2010, aged 49. A man of complexity and worth
investigating.)
I posted this clip of Marvin Foster a few days back said
something about how Foster is a “Quentin Tarantino movie
waiting to happen.”
For the moment let’s just say that Marvin had a good side, a big
heart, was friendly at times to people he didn’t know and talked
openly and often about his love for family — but he also crossed a
lot of lines, hurt a lot of people, and at the very least was a
heavy and often threatening surf world presence.
Hold that thought.
It would be somewhere between hard and impossible to catalog all
the bad choices Marvin Foster made in his relatively short life.
You’ll find a few specifics near the end of this
post, and Foster himself weighs in
here. For the moment let’s just say that Marvin had a
good side, a big heart, was friendly at times to people he didn’t
know and talked openly and often about his love for family — but he
also crossed a lot of lines, hurt a lot of people, and at the very
least was a heavy and often threatening surf world presence.
(Again, I don’t have at hand or want to seek out the particulars
of Foster’s bad actions, and will leave off by saying just that Kai
“Borg” Garcia, possibly the heaviest of the surf-world heavies,
called Foster “one of the toughest men to ever wander the North
Shore.”)
So for Tarantino, or the person watching a Tarantino film, the
question is: How far are you willing to go in terms of allowing
history to mitigate a person’s crimes, flaws, and moral failings?
Or more to the point: How damaging was it for Marvin to grow up
poor and dark-skinned in Hawaii during the 1960s and ’70s?
Since we’re being cinematic and historical, picture this.
It is 1909 on the Waikiki beachfront. Before us is a hot young
gun with seven vowels and two apostrophes in his last name, the
Marvin Foster of the new century, eating lunch after a surf and
minding his business when somebody walks up and drops this magazine
article in his lap.
He reads to the bottom of the page. “The white man and boy
are doing much in Hawaii to develop the art of surf-riding . . .
and at the recent surfing carnivals in honor of the visits of the
American battleship fleet, practically every prize offered for
those most expert in Hawaiian water sports were won by white boys
and girls, who have only recently mastered the art that was for so
long believed to be possible of acquirement only by the native-born
dark-skinned Hawaiian.”
Our boy shakes his head, hands the magazine back, tosses his
board into the banyan tree for safekeeping, heads home to find out
a Mainland newcomer just paid down his uncle’s delinquent property
tax bill and legally snatched up the
deed to his family’s one acre-plot.
Have we mitigated yet? Getting closer?
“Why do I feel like stomping the haole? Well, look at my side of
things. Suppose I came over to your house and said you weren’t
dressing right, you weren’t living right, and this and that. You’d
get mad and sock me too. It’s a lot deeper, I guess, but that’s the
way we feel.” Unnamed Hawaiian.
One more example, from a 1969 issue of SURFER, and this is one
that really stuck with me as a kid, I think because the violence
was delivered in such a calm voice. “Haole Go Home” was written by
an unnamed Hawaiian.
Here’s the condensed version:
Why do I feel like stomping the haole? Well, look at my side
of things. Suppose I came over to your house and said you weren’t
dressing right, you weren’t living right, and this and that. You’d
get mad and sock me too. It’s a lot deeper, I guess, but that’s the
way we feel. Captain Cook and the missionaries that followed taught
us that we were sinners. They brought the word of God, but I don’t
think God had this in mind. This rape of Hawaii! It makes my blood
boil when I see all the hotels and stores, all the ships in our
harbors, servicemen on our streets and tourists jamming up
everything. Till a few years ago, we could still get away from all
of this by going surfing. Now that’s even taken over by the haole.
So once in a while when I get a few good blasts of beer going, I
get to thinking of all of these things, and some haole acts up;
well, I just bust him one good one, and I feel a little
better.
In terms of letting Marvin off the hook, no, I still don’t think
we’re in Django territory. But let’s acknowledge that he was not
acting in a void, and that to fully understand how and why Marvin
got bent you’ll have to put on a 12-bolt bronze helmet and say
goodbye to the sun cause the dive is going to be deep, long, and
dark.
Meanwhile, through all that, possibly because of all that,
Foster surfed like a big cat running down a gazelle while listening
to Metallica.
Loading comments...
Load Comments
0
Tahiti Pro, Day Two: “It’s a strange sport
that doesn’t seem to understand what sport is and what sport does
and yet in its outcomes is crueller than almost any other
endeavour!”
By Longtom
"I know this is a minority opinion but I find
head-high Chopes an entertaining watch. Very absorbing, very
intriguing."
A bit of bookkeeping to tidy up the numbers at perfect
ten-foot (Yeppoon scale) Teahupoo is not the worst thing
in the world.
I know this is a minority opinion but I find head-high Chopes an
entertaining watch. Very absorbing, very intriguing.
On paper, a great equaliser. On paper, incredibly simple: tubes
any accomplished amateur could wrangle, enough waves for everyone
to cut a piece off etc etc.
But, it ain’t.
In fact it does the opposite to equalize. I love because it
exposes one of the great lies constantly perpetuated by all and
sundry at the wossle, especially a commentary team that should and
does know better.
Ross Williams verbalised it perfectly yesterday when he said,
“Everyone on Tour is a weapon here.”
What would be the harm if Barton were to say, quite truthfully,
that surfers with more experience, greater courage, higher line-up
intelligence and superior skill sets had a massive advantage here
and that that was clearly reflected in the results?
He, as coach of John John Florence, must know more than anybody
that this is a fiction. To use a phrase he employed today against
him: it’s fake news. What I don’t understand is the purpose of this
fiction.
What would be the harm if Barton were to say, quite truthfully,
that surfers with more experience, greater courage, higher line-up
intelligence and superior skill sets had a massive advantage here
and that that was clearly reflected in the results?
It’s a strange sport that doesn’t seem to understand what sport
is and what sport does and yet in its outcomes is crueller than
almost any other endeavour. It seems as if the commentary team is
commentating for the benefit of the Top 34, handing out gold
participation awards and mollifying losses.
Mixed bag in the line-up. South runners with thin pinching exits
and bulbous wedges with a more westerly angle. Seabass found the
best of it with two dreamboat runners that stayed open. The
controversy in the heat centred on the final exchange between Jordy
Smith and local Matahi Drollet.
It’s a strange sport that doesn’t seem to understand what sport
is and what sport does and yet in its outcomes is crueller than
almost any other endeavour. It seems as if the commentary team is
commentating for the benefit of the Top 34, handing out gold
participation awards and mollifying losses.
Jordy’s wave was clean and longer, with two turns. Adjudged a
6.87. Drollet’s taller and rounder but he had to slow down for the
tube. Granted a 6.5. The breakdown in the panel: every judge except
the local Tahitian judge found Jordy’s wave better. I think, fair
do’s. Judges discerned the technical difference between the two
rides. The bigger tragedy, picked up in the live comments, was
eliminating the local specialist who could dominate heavy water in
baby food. In effect, forcing the trials winner to surf two more
trials heats to get to the main event.
The other wildcard, Hawaiian Tyler Newton, who I confess I’ve
never heard of and can only conjure up an image of Brad Pitt in Fight Club
when I hear his name, also failed to progress. Ok, that was Tyler
Durden, I googled it, but I bet there are GenX fight club fan
parents behind Tyler Newton watching their boy and hoping he would
get through. He did not.
Ryan Callinan had a plan, which was to wait for the good ones
and get barrelled. After twenty minutes he pulled the trigger and
got pinched. Plan fail.
Weirdly, once he jettisoned the plan the good ones came to him
like flies to a honey trap.
Poof! Blown out with a puff of spit, a lone frigate
bird gliding on a swell behind him. Then another. Last to
first.
Heat three was really about wishing and hoping Bourez got
through so there would at least be some Tahitian representation
when the surf gets real. He struggled at first then relaxed and
started to employ the different interpretations of tube-stalling he
possesses. The back leg now dragging off the outside rail, not the
inside like we saw at big Cloudbreak, enabled an extra second or
two behind the curtain.
Luck played a bigger factor than anything in deciding the heat.
Peterson Crisanto was perfectly positioned for a dreamy bomb. Best
wave of the day and after bobbling the take-off it only required a
clean backdoor entry and exit to score excellent and take the
heat.
Remember Brett Simpson? Specifically, anyone here remember his
heroics in 2011 at Teahupoo? Not Code Red swell but a big paddle
day they jagged just after it.
I had Griffin Colapinto pegged as this year’s Simpo; the
Californian who would transcend his small-wave upbringing and
charge. After heat four today I’m switching my Simpo candidature to
Conner Coffin. The hobbit looked very calm, very composed. Perfect
technique.
Easy win against M-Rod and Jesse Mendes.
Four heats in glassy perfect tubes. Blue water. Mountains. How
can a sane person stand agin it?
*Magnificently surreal.
**A nice story in the OC Register about it.
Round of 32 Matchups:
Heat 1: Kanoa Igarashi (JPN) vs. Jadson Andre (BRA)
Heat 2: Adrian Buchan (AUS) vs. Deivid Silva (BRA)
Heat 3: Owen Wright (AUS) vs. Soli Bailey (AUS)
Heat 4: Michel Bourez (FRA) vs. Sebastian Zietz (HAW)
Heat 5: Italo Ferreira (BRA) vs. Adriano de Souza (BRA)
Heat 6: Joan Duru (FRA) vs. Willian Cardoso (BRA)
Heat 7: Jordy Smith (ZAF) vs. Ricardo Christie (NZL)
Heat 8: Julian Wilson (AUS) vs. Yago Dora (BRA)
Heat 9: Kolohe Andino (USA) vs. Kauli Vaast (FRA)
Heat 10: Wade Carmichael (AUS) vs. Jeremy Flores (FRA)
Heat 11: Ryan Callinan (AUS) vs. Griffin Colapinto (USA)
Heat 12: Gabriel Medina (BRA) vs. Ezekiel Lau (HAW)
Heat 13: Filipe Toledo (BRA) vs. Jesse Mendes (BRA)
Heat 14: Seth Moniz (HAW) vs. Peterson Crisanto (BRA)
Heat 15: Conner Coffin (USA) vs. Caio Ibelli (BRA)
Heat 16: Kelly Slater (USA) vs. Jack Freestone (AUS)
Tahiti Pro Past Winners:
2018: Gabriel Medina (BRA)
2017: Julian Wilson (AUS)
2016: Kelly Slater (USA)
2015: Jeremy Flores (FRA)
2014: Gabriel Medina (BRA)
2013: Adrian Buchan (AUS)
2012: Mick Fanning (AUS)
2011: Kelly Slater (USA)
2010: Andy Irons (HAW)
2009: Bobby Martinez (USA)
2008: Bruno Santos (BRA)
2007: Damien Hobgood (USA)
2006: Bobby Martinez (USA)
2005: Kelly Slater (USA)
2004: C.J. Hobgood (USA)
2003: Kelly Slater (USA)
2002: Andy Irons (HAW)
2001: Cory Lopez (USA)
2000: Kelly Slater (USA)
1999: Mark Occhilupo (AUS)