It's a lie multiplier!
Yesterday it was revealed that Facebook had allegedly knowingly lied about the numbers of people watching videos on its platform for years. The Wall Street Journal uncovered that the possible malfeasance was much larger, and much greater, than previously reported.
And let us turn to Wired for a quick recap.
Facebook acknowledged in 2016 that it had been overstating to advertisers the average time users spent watching videos on the platform. But when exactly Facebook found out about that error—and how long the company kept it under wraps—is now the subject of a federal district court lawsuit in California. The suit, filed earlier this week, was brought by Facebook advertisers who allege that Facebook knew about the measurement error for more than a year before it was first reported publicly in The Wall Street Journal.
But advertisers aren’t the only ones seething over the prospect of Facebook knowingly inflating its video viewership; members of the press are, too.
According to the complaint, which Facebook has dismissed as being “without merit,” the company may have been alerted to the analytics error as early as 2015 by advertisers who reported seeing an unrealistic 100 percent average viewership rates on some videos. It was also around that time that many newsrooms across the country began laying off reporters, in what has become snarkily known as the “pivot to video.”
Now, of course this relates to surfing because everything relates to surfing but also because just last year the World Surf League announced a partnership with Facebook that it called “groundbreaking.” The subsequent roll-out was marred with troubles and grumbles and odd explanations for the number of viewers that is still impossibly murky.
Beyond the World Surf League, the surf media, alongside the lame-stream media, began its almost exclusive relationship with Facebook years ago. It is difficult/impossible to grow any sort of audience without the publishing giant and “likes” and “shares” became the new currency, with certain properties better at juicing those “likes” and “shares” than others.
All publishing, it seems, geared itself solely toward attracting a mass audience, a completely oddly unrealistic audience in both size and scope and Facebook fed this beast.
So, who cares?
Well, I do because I hate bullshit and Facebook is bullshit. Oh I know it’s just a tool and railing against a tool is tool-like but I still don’t understand why everything has to be such bullshit?
So damned fake and fraudy.
Everything is so damned fake and fraudy. I know it has always been sort of this way, that surf magazines used to print way more than they could ever sell, burn the extras and claim massive subscription numbers but that seemed like real work. Like, going to a burn bin and catching physical things on fire.
Facebook has streamlined the fraud and maybe even convinced people that it’s real. Like, the World Surf League. Do you think the powers that be in Santa Monica’s gilded offices really believe that there are millions upon millions of potential surf fans because Facebook has taught them that millions upon millions of “likes” and “shares” are out there or do you think the powers are in on the game, juicing the “like” and “shares”, lying about engagement to advertisers just as Facebook lied to them?
A lie multiplier.
Hell if I know and hell if my caring about it will make any difference but since when did a few hundred thousand people really loving something and engaging with something become so… small? So… immaterial?
Gimme the hardened little core and fuck the potential trillions.
Well when ZoSea etc took over the show in 2013, part of the deal was that they put $100,000 into the original holding company, ASP llc. That $100k was enough to cover annual SEC filings, tax returns etc for seven years. It was a kind of insurance against the collapse or dismissal of the new regime — there would be a corporate home waiting for the world tour, just in case. The money will be gone by the end of 2019, and so will ASP llc. So there will be no going back.
Tech grit
Ultra hard software analysis
I was watching on Foxtel and giving my money to Rupert Murdoch in true Stockholm Syndrome fashion.
Jeep surfs the internet on an inflated mat.
Facebook simply co-opted – then scaled – the old print-advertising paradigm for the digital age.
FB owns the data, with this obviously monopolised power of ownership … trails corruption.
The early Internet Evangelists got it so wrong: information wasn’t Democratised – it has been Centralised. The Four Horseman (Apple / Google / Amazon / Facebook ) have such corporate clout, even Governments play pony to their demands.
… anyone ‘attempted’ to resolve an issue with Goggle?
Chas….Nagatron is going to ban you…negative narrative.
A corporation
Whose model is built on lies
Like a fish that swims
Nobodies watching because everyone surfing abusing each other, and especially abusing women
Too big to fail, so just fudge the numbers, American late stage capitalism 101
Circa 2077: lil’ Johnny asks robot- who took down Facebook? A surf journalist named Chas Smith, 1970- 20??. No record of his demise exits.
Brilliant. Maybe lil’ Johnny IS the robot..huuwhaaaattt https://uploads.disquscdn.c…
I’m still on the Fox train in Au so don’t see my compadres in a “regional” tally while enjoying the ripping. Difficult not to do feel the like currency in general life and it sux. I propose it’s all more a symptom of us than the company butt raping all and sundry. We sign up willingly and we’ve probably already sold our soles, future rights, offspring’s image rights and data years ago in the terms of some now in a landfill gadget, or service like Facerape. Not surprised facey is ripping off their clients. Add the wozzle to the list.. CIA data mining behemoths acting surreptitiously, who’d have thought! Where is Alex Jones when you need him? Oh, yeah, he’s been de-personed.
Where’s my tin foil, I need a hat!
7K viewers for Portugal day before yesterday, as seen on upper left corner of my screen. This morning it looked like metric was totally gone from the screen. Just me? Anybody else notice that?
Were you watching from Seattle? Only ask because what WSL said about FB viewer counts being regional. I really want to try and figure out how the regions are broken out, shit if that’s even a real thing. But 7K worldwide seems realistic to me.
This is like a 21st century version of the movie Chinatown. Instead of water it’s FB viewer counts. Chas you could be Jake Gittes! “Forget it Chas, it’s Santa Monica”
Watching from Seattle
Ha!
When they first switched over to be webcast to fb the comments section established very quickly that there was coincidentally exactly the same amount of regional viewers on opposite corners of the globe.
7k in America, 7k in Australasia, separate, added up or even multiplied it’s a pissant number.
Yep. That’s the thing I can’t get around my head. Even if you take the lowest extreme of total surfer numbers worldwide of 3 mill, versus the optimistic perhaps 30 mill, 14k is 0.4% of the ‘target’ audience. Let alone the non-surfing target.