Watch: Couple brutally arrested on Mexico
beach for allegedly refusing to purchase, enjoy cocktails!
By Chas Smith
Surfers Paradise.
It sometimes feels like our kind, our nasty
surfing kind, is nearing extinction. Laws against punching people
in the face who drop in, punching them in the neck when they paddle
too close, throwing rocks at people who aren’t local, flipping a
board over and bashing the fins right out, menacing and causing a
general nuisance now cover most beaches.
Hunted.
We’re being hunted into extinction but thankfully there’s a
beach in Mexico holding on to our values. Our way of life for just
this past weekend a couple was arrested for refusing to get lit and
let’s hurry to Fox
News for a fair and balanced take on the incident.
On Sunday, a man and woman were handcuffed by police at
Mamitas Beach Club in Playa del Carmen for hanging out on the
shore, but not purchasing anything from the club’s bar.
In the clip, a group of police is seen surrounding the
couple as they pack up their belongings in a towel. The woman
resists being handcuffed and cries, while her shirtless partner
seemingly complies with the authorities.
According to The Sun, local media reported that the beach
club alleges to exclusively own the portion of the beach area where
the tourists were arrested, though locals have argued that the
beach is federal property where all are welcome.
“The beaches in Mexico are NOT private Mamitas Beach, they
are [for] all Mexicans. Enough of treating nationals like trash!”
the Twitter user who posted the arrest video said.
The woman was reportedly left bleeding from the forceful
arrest, The Sun reports.
Well, I don’t understand what the trouble is and think many more
beaches should adopt the Mamitas attitude and force visitors to
purchase, enjoy cocktails. Imagine what a glorious scene Snapper
would turn into if forced alcohol was part of the price. Imagine
Malibu after a three drink minimum.
We’d be free once again.
Loading comments...
Load Comments
0
Celebrate: Noosa joins Santa Cruz, Manly
Beach as world’s tenth “Surfing Reserve!”
By Chas Smith
Glide!
As surfers, as Co-Waterpersons of the Year in
waiting, we know how important the ocean’s waves are to
our overall way of life. Without them we’d be but clanging gongs.
But YouTube sensation Ben Gravies sliding down funny little boat
wakes and storm gutters and whatnots having the absolute times of
our lives but… not really surfing.
Oh, I take absolutely nothing away from Ben Gravy, he is our
world’s happy smile, but… the ocean’s waves are why most of us do
what we do. Why we wake up early, get cold on purpose etc.
Thankfully, there is a way to honor the waves that mean
something… more. Waves that have imprinted themselves, indelibly,
on our psyches.
In 2009, “Save The Waves
Coalition, along with key partners National Surfing
Reserves (NSR) Australia and the International Surfing Association
(ISA), launched World Surfing Reserves. The program serves as a
global model for preserving wave breaks and their surrounding areas
by recognizing and protecting the key environmental, cultural,
economic and community attributes of surfing areas.”
Very fine.
It is a lengthy process to have a wave, or region I suppose,
declared a World Surf Reserve. Applications and voting etc. but
yesterday Noosa there on Australia’s Sunshine Coast joined the
ranks of Malibu, Ericeria, Manly Beach, Santa Cruz, Huanchaco,
Bahia de Todos Santos, Australia’s Gold Coast, Punta de Lobos and
Guarda do Embaú to become the tenth World Surfing Reserve.
“Noosa has always been leading the way on how to protect surf
ecosystems and critical coastal habitats proactively and
simultaneously benefit local people and the economy,” said Nik
Strong-Cvetich, executive director of Save The Waves.
Layne Beachley and Noosa’s mayor were on hand to celebrate the
declaration, the day, and bravo Noosa.
Now, are there any places we should push as a World Surfing
Reserve/
What about where World Surf League CEO and Lord Commander over
The Wall of Positive Noise Erik Logan cut his supping teeth?
Manhattan Beach, California.
Can we all get behind this?
Yes?
Or Surf Ranch, Lemoore?
Loading comments...
Load Comments
0
Can you guess the preferred method of
deterrence chosen by surf Mamas and Papas looking to protect their
progeny during the height of the shark attack crisis of 2015/16 in
the hamlet of Lennox Head? Wrong. It was a diving knife strapped to
the calf, ready for hand-to-hand combat with the Leviathan. I shit
you not comrades. Frame grab from Zombie 2
Longtom on: the effectiveness of shark
deterrents and Lennox groms “strapping knives to their calves ready
for hand-to-hand combat with Great Whites!”
By Longtom
What… doesn't… work is "education"…
One of the things I’m proudest of, when I look around at
my fellow surf brethren and sistren, is our level of detailed
knowledge of sharks and shark deterrents.
To a man, woman and child I don’t know a single one who doesn’t
get apoplectic when some egghead suggests that “education” is
somehow an effective amelioration for reducing shark attacks.
Education?
Where’s the fucking evidence?
There ain’t none.
Even the chief shark researching stud Charlie Huveneers,
Associate Prof at South Australia’s Flinders University drops it in
his gold standard peer-reviewed science paper on the effectiveness
of the various commercially available personal shark
deterrents.
I mention as counterpoint to a new vid dropped by personal
deterrent brand Sharkbanz – which claims to work by using a
magnetic field to disrupt the electro-receptors contained in an
organ most elasmobranchs* possess which rejoices under the the
moniker: Ampullae of Lorenzini**.
The Sharkbanz footage, filmed in the glorious blue waters of the
north-west of Western Australia is, of course, powerful testimony
as to its efficacy. A cloth dummy named Bernie gets baited up and
propped up on a board with and without the Sharkbanz attached to
his ankle. Sharks seem to very much enjoy savaging his lower limbs
when they are undressed of the magnetic bracelet.
According to Charlie’s peer reviewed 2018 paper: “Neither
the SharkBanz bracelet nor leash affected the
behaviour of hite sharks or reduced the percentage of baits
taken.”
Huveneers made the additional point, summarising the existing
scientific research as well as his own, that any deterrent effect
on sharks was likely to be only when the shark was closer than
fifty centimetres causing him to reach the following
conclusion,
“This suggests that magnets are unlikely to be effective at
deterring sharks because they will only protect close to the
magnet, limiting their applicability as personal deterrents unless
stronger magnets can be used or many magnets are positioned on the
surfer or board.”
Who to believe?
Bernie or the Prof?
One cat around here who believes in the Sharkbanz is local chef
Jabez Reitzman.
Reitzman has also been hit by a shark, suffering wounds to his
shoulder when what is believed to be a juvenile White latched onto
him around around seven am, Feb 8, 2015, two days before Tadashi
Nakahara was fatally mauled down the the road at
Ballina. Reitzman told me out the back at Lennox Point
he believes in the Sharkbanz, to which I replied: yeah, but you got
bit.
To which he replied: forgot to put it on that day.
True.
How good is the placebo effect though.
Mother Nature made a deal with the human mind to allow us to
believe in things that are useful to us even if they ain’t strictly
true.
There are strong proponents for this way of thinking. Queensland
University shark researcher Blake Chapman said in relation to
personal shark deterrents,
“These things may or may not work, but the chances of being
bitten are so small, that if it’s giving you peace of mind to go
out there and do your activity then it’s doing its job.”
A very much weirder advocate for a version of the placebo effect
comes from South African inter-species communicator Anna
Breytenbach.
She claims, after consulting with “Great White shark universal
consciousness” that competitiveness and bad vibes might draw the
predatory attention of White sharks.
Local surfer and environmental activist Dean Jefferies puts her
thought into action thusly: “I send a telepathic message to any
sharks that maybe in the area that I am their friend, I am not food
or competition. I calm my energy, breath and heart rate and I
transmute any lingering fear I may have around sharks. I say in my
mind to any possible nearby shark, could you please keep a small
distance away, and we can both be here in relative harmony with
each other. “
What am I saying?
I’m saying that if wearing Sharkbanz helps keep the organism
chill and in non-prey mode then it’s effectiveness as a shark
deterrent may not be an entirely anti-scientific proposition
despite the conclusions of Assoc Prof Huveneers.
Can you guess the preferred method of deterrence chosen by surf
Mamas and Papas looking to protect their progeny during the height
of the shark attack crisis of 2015/16 in the hamlet of Lennox
Head?
Wrong.
It was a diving knife strapped to the calf, ready for
hand-to-hand combat with the Leviathan. I shit you not
comrades.
Education. We don’t need no education.
How are Sharkbanz selling locally in one of the sharkiest joints
on earth?
I hit the bricks in Byron, Lennox and Ballina and couldn’t find
one for sale.
Looks like a ready made role for a recently retired pro who
needs some sales repping work.
Anyone come to mind?
I know we are really dragging this one out but time for a little
super quick shark tale as dessert?
Just one little scoop.
Glorious winters day in ’93.
Honeymooning couple Debbie and John Ford are ascending from a
dive at Julian Rocks, a mile out to sea in Byron Bay. John sees an
eighteen-foot White headed for his bride and puts himself between
it and the gal.
Gets bitten in half.
Local fisherman Ron Boggis is deputised by the constabulary to
hunt the shark down. He hooks the monster on a drum line and it
tows him and the boat miles and miles out to sea.
Hours pass with the fisherman locked in battle with the shark.
In the dark he gets close enough to try and loose rounds of a .33
into the beast.
The shark snaps the chain, leaving only the mans regurgitated
leg as a reminder of the battle as it slinks off into the inky
waters of the night.
*Sharks.
** Damn it feels good to put this Marine Biology degree to
use.
Loading comments...
Load Comments
0
Beware: Voodoo doll made with human teeth
and skin found on Florida beach, put back in water to “curse a
damned surfer!”
By Chas Smith
Very creepy.
As if Florida waters didn’t have enough
worries, enough troubles and travails already. There are:
Sharks, crocodiles, snowbirds, locals, NASCAR enthusiasts just to
name but a few and now we can add a voodoo doll made with human
teeth and skin floating somewhere off the coast, waiting for a
surfer to pluck it out and curse our kind forever.
The doll was found on Cape Canaveral, very near Kelly Slater’s
hometown of Cocoa Beach, by a man named Bruce Robertson as he was
walking on the beach.
“What was really sort of terrifying or horrifying or interesting
was it had actual human teeth,” he told Orlando’s local news.
He then tossed it back in the ocean because other beachgoers
told him it was a voodoo doll and it should be destroyed and/or
found by a surfer in order to curse our damned kind. That’s what I
would have told him, anyhow, had I been beach walking too.
He took some pictures before setting it free and, later, after
doing some internet research decided it was not, in fact, a voodoo
doll but the African spider god Anansi used for good luck.
Orlando’s local
news took the photos to an African bookstore owner in
Kelly Slater’s Cocoa named Michelle Davis.
“This right here is creepy,” Davis said pointing to the
human teeth.
She also believed the doll had human skin on it.
Davis thought it could have all been part of a voodoo
ritual.
She said people still believe in voodoo.
“They do it here in Cocoa,” Davis said. “They do it all over
in Florida, Louisiana, New Orleans. Voodoo is real,” she
said.
Because the doll is back in the ocean, Robertson is advising
the next person who may find it to not be afraid.
“If anybody else finds it, it is not a voodoo doll. It’s
really a good luck doll from Africa,” he said.
Yeah. A “good luck doll.”
Remember when Greg Brady, set to win a professional surfing
championship, found a “good luck” tiki doll in Hawaii?
Exactly.
Surfers beware.
Loading comments...
Load Comments
0
Update: 60-year-old New Zealand surf legend
punches 9-foot Great White shark “smack bang in the eye!”
By Chas Smith
Not the nose as previously reported.
Boxing is a funny thing. In the moment,
passions run so hot, fevers so high, that it is difficult to
accurately assess where every punch lands. The nose and the eye are
mere centimeters apart and so please forgive this
morning’s report when it was revealed that a New
Zealand surfer, likely inspired by Wilder vs. Fury II*, punched a
shark in the nose.
As it turns out, and thanks to very fine reporting by New
Zealand’s own Riley Elliott, that the surfer, 60-year-old Nick
Minogue (possible relation to Kylie) punched a shark, a 9 foot
Great White no less, in the eye.
And let us go straight to his Instagram account for the very
latest.
https://www.instagram.com/p/B84fEkwnRVf/
When a shark attack happens on your local surf beach, and
it’s likely a Great White, of which generally aren’t common in this
area, it’s a surreal feeling. I spoke in length with Nick, the man
who experienced this, straight after it happened, to try and get
the fine details among the obvious shock and trauma experienced.
The fine details help piece together what the shark likely was and
how it behaved. From his description to me, which is well versed in
the article from the paper, it appears to be a 2-3m great white
shark.
The key points that led me to this was firstly, bronze
whalers, our most common coastal species in this area, swim around
us a lot when we surf here. They are very smart about knowing what
we are, so it would be highly surprising to have one follow through
simple interest and curiosity with a full scale nibble. It would
generally be more of a bump, and generally only if you have fish on
you. The main point that eliminated my thoughts on a bronze whaler
was Nicks detailed description of the eye, specifically how big it
was. He said it was 2/3rds the size of a fist.
Bronze whalers have small squinty eyes compared to a mako or
white sharks, which have large eyes. To eliminate a mako, it is
firstly odd to have one of this approximated 2-3m size, this close
inshore. The colour Nick described, as grey also made a mako more
unlikely, and a white the probable species. NZ is a global hotspot
for great whites but generally the south islands lower half where
seals live.
However our northern estuaries are nursery grounds for baby
whites and when they get above 2.5m they change their diet to seals
and move down the coast. This sets a scene which is explanatory for
such an encounter. Yes it’s rare and unlikely, but the scenario for
what was an investigatory bite by a juvenile shark, makes sense.
Thank you Nick for being calm and cool.
For not letting it deter you from a sport you love, and for
understanding that sharks don’t have hands and sometimes have to
nibble. I’m just stoked you got your arm out of the way. Well done
mate. Thanks to the lifeguards for, as always, doing a great job.
I’m down in Tairua tomorrow if anyone needs any
information.