Terrible, terrible mess in the last fortnight
Disaster porn is the new surf jernalizm, at least when
it comes to covering the WSL.
Terrible, terrible mess in the last fortnight.
Bells is now officially kyboshed. The disastrous Lennox bid has
been officially memory holed now that the “fourth” CT has been
substituted at Newy. It’s a higgledy-piggledy approach from the
Woz. Normally when you count to four you begin at one, then go to
two, three, four etc etc.
Andrew Stark got Newy approved as the first event of the
Australian leg and called it the fourth, which means not only is
Bells cancelled but we now are in a post-maths world when it comes
to World Tour coverage.
On the face of it, pro surfing should have natural advantages to
thrive in the Covid sporting landscape. In actuality it’s been one
of the worst affected, mostly not due to the virus but a deadly
combination of hubris, a lack of vision and a business model
hopelessly dependent on the good graces of Australian*
politicians.
Can we believe any of the maxed-out corpo spin presser about a
new three-year deal for Bells?
Kelly and Outerknown
signed a three year deal for Fiji that was wordlessly reneged on
after one. I’m not by nature a naysayer, I prefer a
“Yes!” to a grim-faced “No” but extreme scepticism seems the only
fair and reasonable response to the shenanigans unfolding with the
WSL this year.
If they tell me the sky is blue I’m going to assume it’s grey
unless I see it with my own eyes.
For a global sporting organisation dedicated to “changing the
world through the inspirational power of surfing by creating
authentic events, experiences, and storytelling”, is it not a major
trip out how badly the WSL under Starkey lost the room when it came
to the failed Lennox CT bid? Especially when it came to their
supposed new strength, “best in class” storytelling?
I think a little examination, for the historical record, is in
order.
Humans are hard-wired to seek meaning in story, according to
many, including Eric Hoffer, whose classic work “The
True Believer” outlined the necessity of belonging to a story
bigger than the individual.
Can a foundation story for such a sense of belonging be based on
a lie or at least a very shaky premise?
From the about tab on the website: The World Surf
League (WSL), established in 1976…
Huh?
The WSL didn’t exist until 2014 and the “acquisition” wasn’t
exactly all rainbows and unicorns, according to my source who sat
in on the board meetings. That bad blood still sits pooled up in
various back swamps, oozing out like a miasma when the WSL needs
friends to help tell the story, as they did when Starky came
knocking on the chamber door at Ballina.
Starkey should have had those friends on lock.
In 2008, when Rip Curl was kicked out of town following their
ill-fated Lennox Search bid Andrew Stark was CEO of Surfing QLD. He
would have been well aware of community sentiments. Well aware that
the rec surfing community was averse to the infamous long dick in
the guts of a full-scale pro event imposed on them with its
attendant hangover.
Starkey won’t remember it but I was in his office a few years
earlier, interviewing him as part of a social science documentary
on Kirra. I have the tape and scrupulous notes, as always.
My impression then (and now) was that here was a true True
Believer when it came to corporate/bureaucratic surfing. The goal
was numbers, growth, success and the method was government funding
via tourism and participation metrics.
I don’t believe the concerns of the rec surfer base, the host
body on which the whole show depends, ever crossed his mind.
Starkey proved himself an effective operator working the
peculiarly Australian nexus between peak bodies like Surfing QLD
and Surfing Australia and political operators at state and national
level.
His “constituency”, his people, are the boardriders clubs.
There, he finds a natural alignment with his interests and world
view. The blunt instrument that has become the de facto method of
attaining goals at Surfing QLD, then Surfing Australia and now the
WSL is the state politician.
In currying favour with State Tourism Ministers and Deputy
Premiers the pathway to get events approved and funded does not
pass through the eye of the needle of local government or
communities.
Which works great for long-standing events like Bells and
Snapper where the narrative, even if never put to the people, is
long established and accepted.
It presents more of a threat to expansion or plan changes when
the heavy lifting is done by state politicians like
John Barilaro, who has been accused of political bastardry by his
own side.
The story he tells, of exposure and huge tourism growth, doesn’t
have the appeal needed. Especially when the organisation belongs to
an American billionaire who freely suckles from the teat of the
Australian taxpayer.
The crux of the nut: it looks like cheap rent-seeking for a
product that few want in their backyards and a story that has never
really made sense except for a few rare birds who live at an
altitude the rest of us will never attain.
Why did Starkey not try and win the argument first? Why not
wheel out the storytellers? Where were the allies?
In the aftermath it was amazing how friendless the WSL was.
Former ASP CEO Graham Cassidy exclaimed “It would never happen
with the ASP!!”
Former ASP Australia king pin Bushy Mitchell laid the boot in
saying in his time it would never have happened and accusing the
WSL of failing to address ethical and moral issues.
With friends like these etc etc.
In an interview with Nick
Carroll on Surfline, more noteworthy for what was not said than
what was said, Stark cooly brushed off the Lennox
fiasco saying, “Obviously it was rejected. Which is cool — if you
don’t want us to come to your town, we’re not coming.”
The follow-up questions of “Why do you think it was rejected?
Why do you think you weren’t wanted?” were left dangling in the
ether. That’s leaving out the issue of what made Stark think it a
good idea in the first place without some sort of community
softening up before he tried to go through the back door.
Starkey never sought to win the argument or tell the story
because he never thought he’d have to. He secured state government
support first from Barilaro, then picked off the local boardriders
and the Mayor, who would’ve been ready for the photo op when the
comp was announced a week later.
The Wozzle under that model only needs the story ready to go
post hoc.
After the politicians have done the heavy lifting. I’d love to
read the presser that was written for the Ox before it was hastily
shelved and re-written for Newy.
But alas, down the memory hole it goes.
Bad blood is inherent in the current WSL operational model.
The story told behind closed doors to secure political favour
and money is toxic to the rec surfer fan base and stinks of what
Oscar Wilde termed “low grade tyranny”.
Is there any other global or national sporting entity that
treats its fans with such contempt?
Weaves a cocoon of such blatant corpo BS around them to appease
the sensitivities of the politicians who keep the sport alive?
Without a functioning business model to wean itself off State
Tourism bodies the WSL is locked in a prison of its own making.
*And Hawaiians