Kelly Slater Impossible Air

WSL Head Judge: Slater’s air “worth nothing!”

Rich Porta breaks down Kelly Slater's attempted air at the Hurley Pro…

Did I ever tell you about the time I became a WSL judge, if ever so briefly, at the US Open? And how, upon throwing open the door to the judges’ tower, I was greeted by naked pro surfers serving food while studs or “cockmongers” (a young pro chosen for his large penis) fondled each other in front of the judges, arousing them greatly?

(Read about it here)

Of course, the conspiracy shit that surrounds the WSL judges is as dumb as it is awesome to read. And, Rich Porta, the Australian head judge, is anything but secretive about how the game is called.

In this clip, Kelly talks through the air he nearly made at the Hurley Pro; Rich explains why it got such a shitty score.

Kelly is forensic, as usual, and admits to thinking, since he landed in an explosion of whitewater, maybe he’d be able to ride out of it and no one would know a thing. Occy did it back in the eighties at Huntington and won the contest.

“I felt like I screwed up a normal air reverse,” says Kelly. “I didn’t realise I was so detached from my board. My knees smashed into both rails ahead of the deck pad and perfectly on a plane…I got off my knees and onto my feet and I realised I was in the whitewater. (I thought) it might almost look like it was landed…”

Y’ain’t fooling Rich Porta.

“You’ve gotta remember this is the best 34 surfers in the world,” says Rich. “They have to complete these manoeuvres. If you do the most amazing aerial in the world, the most amazing aerial the world’s ever seen, and you land on your belly, it’s an incomplete manoeuvre. Everyone has to realise it’s an incomplete manoeuvre. It’s worth nothing. The surfers know all that. There’s no dissension among the athletes about that score.”

And if he’d landed clean?

“The score would’ve been no problem,” says Rich. “It would’ve been a ten.”

Kelly Slater, Head Judge Break Down Attempted Air at 2015 Hurley Pro
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
21 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Paddymick
Paddymick
10 years ago

Anyone noticed Johanne Defay scored an 8.5 in round 2 heat 2 of the Cascais Womens Pro by doing one turn, going prone, paddling, standing up again and doing another turn? One wave? And Kelly gets a 4.17 when he lands on his knees and stands up? Check out the analyzer. Its a conspiracy?

Blink
Blink
11 years ago

Don’t see why people are hung up on the air either. The rest of the heat was where the real bad judging took place mick getting a high 7 for a couple shitty snaps. Kelly only getting a 5 or six for 2 decent round house cutties an a air reverse.

joe tucci
joe tucci
11 years ago

why didn’t they finish the comp last week when the surf was perfect? now it’s gonna end in poo-like conditions. greedy

Captain Clark
Captain Clark
11 years ago

I feel like this is a waste of time to reply, but I wanted to thank you for correcting my grammer. How silly of me, and I feel so very much remorse. Thank you again for that! To clarify my comment, I was implying that I thought it was silly for one, (you) to be (offended) by others taking issue with the score of said ride. Simply calling people stupid for their opinion (which differ from your own) is in itself stupid. Do you not see the irony in this discussion? I find it mildy amusing! 🍻cheers!!

Cap'n Crunch
Cap'n Crunch
11 years ago
Reply to  Captain Clark

*grammar, lol.

Captain Clark
Captain Clark
11 years ago
Reply to  Cap'n Crunch

Man, how much better I feel again! I would hate to disappoint the *grammar Natzis with correct spelling and punctuation. I’m thrilled to give you guys something to obsess over.

Cap'n Crunch
Cap'n Crunch
11 years ago
Reply to  Captain Clark

*Nazi. I don’t want to play anymore.

Captain Clark
Captain Clark
11 years ago
Reply to  Cap'n Crunch

Are u sure? I was curious as to how many times you would play?

Captain Clark
Captain Clark
11 years ago

So your offended by someone else being offended? For what it’s worth I thought it was pretty awesome but he (slates) didn’t land it clean thus negating the discussion all together.

Bill Kyte
Bill Kyte
11 years ago

Still doesn’t explain the intensity of incompleting the manuver and the three turns after!

ohhodomavich
ohhodomavich
11 years ago
Reply to  Bill Kyte

Just listen to kelly comments. He explains

omlete
omlete
11 years ago

This whole thing is just more proof that Noa Deane knew what he was talking about. The current WCT format is horrible and needs to change.

Stu Nettle
Stu Nettle
11 years ago

Different waves indeed, but not different scenarios; a make is a make, and if you don’t make it you get zero – according to Porta.

Trogan Fan
Trogan Fan
11 years ago
Reply to  Stu Nettle

he got a 4.17.

That Guy
That Guy
11 years ago

I smell damage control. Having said that Mr Porta is right, but I would have given a 6 for the spectacle

Sampson
Sampson
11 years ago

I would’ve given him a 5 or 6 just because the rest of the ride was deserving as such, BUT still needed like a 7.5+ to win the heat.

Maybe there should be an “X-factor/element of surprise” factor added into the scoring? But at the same time, you don’t want everyone landing sloppy tricks, so kind of a tough call.

NEGATRON
NEGATRON
11 years ago

Hush Richie, the internet does not want to hear such logic.

Trogan Fan
Trogan Fan
11 years ago

yes.

funky Gibbon
funky Gibbon
11 years ago

Shouldn’t the head judge role be like the prime minister in that you only get a limited term as head judge.

Mr porta seems a little comfortable with his position and power and seems to dine out on these type of things a little to much.

Cap'n Crunch
Cap'n Crunch
11 years ago
Reply to  funky Gibbon

interesting….

Stu Nettle
Stu Nettle
11 years ago

Owen Wright scored 3.67 for an “incomplete” barrel ride at Teahupoo last year.

No reason, no context, just sayin’…


21
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x