Just in*: Mick Fanning calls it quits!

For the year! But maybe longer?

Last year was an exceptional one for Mick Fanning by every measure. What were some of your favorite memories? Remember the shark at J-Bay? The fight Derek and I got into about what is appropriate to post? His coming within a hair’s breadth of winning a fourth world title?

Is it any surprise that the man needs a year to himself? He announced today that he will only compete in select events and that’s all. Let’s read the WSL press release:

“Last year was definitely intense – what happened at J-Bay, being in a title race and the unfortunate passing of my brother,” Fanning said. “There was so much build up with everything happening. I got to a point at the end of the year where I felt empty. I didn’t feel like I had much to give back.”

“This year, I’m going to take some time off and have a bit of a personal year,” Fanning continued. “Just to regroup and re-stoke the fire. At this stage, I’m going to compete at Snapper and I’m going to compete at Bells and then I’m going to take some time off from there. They (Snapper and Bells) are two events that I love and I’d go crazy if I were sitting at home and couldn’t go surf Snapper. Bells is like a second home as well. From then on, I feel like I have to take some time away from the tour to get out of that sort of zone to see where my head is at.”

 He will certainly be missed and will also turn 35 in June.

Do you think he will come back or do you think this is it?

Will he very respectfully bow out near his prime and spend those salad years surfing perfect waves whenever and wherever he wants?

*I know “just in” four hours after everyone else. Sorry!

Load Comments

Billionaire to Open Beach to Public!

For thirty million dollars… 

Do you remember last year when it was revealed that the venture capitalist billionaire Vinod Khosla had closed access to Martin’s Beach, near San Francisco?

Five years before, Kholsla had thrown $37-and-a-half million at a 53-acre hunk of land that included what had been the only public access to the beach, a lil private road.

For a few years, nothing changed and then, last year, anyone who wanted to use the private road to get to the beach was gifted the spectacle of private guards blocking their way.

Justin Housman wrote about it eloquently in Surfer magazine last year:

“You may be thinking to yourself, well, what’s the big deal? Khosla owns the property; it’s his right to keep the kids off his lawn. Well, the big deal is that for decades the previous owners of Martin’s Beach had allowed the public to cross the now-closed gate and use a private road to get down to the sand. And the California Constitution declares that all beaches up to the mean high tide line—any beach not owned by the military, anyway—are public property. Normally the law allows property owners to keep the landless hordes from sliming their way across privately held land on their way to a beach. But since the public had used Martin’s Beach Road for decades before Khosla bought the land and shut down the party, a bit of California law called a prescriptive easement kicked in. That means that if the public has traditionally used a bit of private property (in this case, the road), the state has the authority to claim that private land as public. This is why Khosla will lose his fight. People have always had access to Martin’s Beach; Khosla would have, or should have, known that when he bought the land; therefore, he can’t just act all biliionaire-y and cut off long-used access. Case (eventually, after thousands of dollars in legal fees) closed.”

Yesterday, it was revealed in the New York Times that the billionaire will reopen the road… if anyone wants to cough up thirty mill. How’s that for a deal? That’s almost seven mill less than what he paid for the joint eight years ago. A bargain, maybe. Wait.

Y’don’t get the 53-acres, no, no, no.

Thirty million will restore public access to the beach.

What a zany proposition!

Shall we examine the NY Times’ report?

“Now, for the first time, lawyers for Mr. Khosla have proposed in negotiations with the state to restore public access for almost the amount that Mr. Khosla paid for the land.

“But the commission’s executive officer, Jennifer Lucchesi, said in a telephone interview, “We do not agree with that value, and we believe the value is significantly less than that.” Ms. Lucchesi added, “We have not seen any backup documentation to support the $30 million value.”

“The commission planned to offer its own assessment, she said.

“The two sides are actually trying to agree on the value of a right of public use of Martins Beach Road, which leads from the highway to the beach, and access along the shoreline itself, Ms. Lucchesi said.

“The talks were initiated under legislation that took effect in January 2015, she said. If the two sides cannot agree, the commission could resort to eminent domain, which allows the state to expropriate private property for public use.

“Mr. Khosla’s lawyer, Dori L. Yob, could not be reached for comment by telephone or email. But in her letter to the commission, dated Feb. 3, she said that Mr. Khosla’s limited liability companies, the legal entity that owns the property, closed the beach because demand was low, asserting that more than 10 cars showed up to use it only about 15 days a year.

“Ms. Yob said that while the current real estate market value of the land was $30 million, the Martins Beach owners previously offered less expensive solutions to meet the “limited demand” for access as a way to avoid lengthy litigation and further expenses.

“The cost to acquire the property is significant and should be weighed against the benefits,” she wrote. “There is no vital link to navigable waters at issue. There is not a significant demand for access to the property.”

What do you think of this scenario?

Is Mr Khosla a very smart biz-man whose expert nose can sniff out a lucrative opportunity, however it presents itself, or is he the personification of everything wrong within the capitalist system?

That everything, and not just the paper castles of stocks but even the right for ordinary citizens to access a beach, has a price?

Load Comments

In Memoriam: Stab Magazine 2004-2016

For over a decade, Stab navigated the industry with aplomb and great gusto. It will be missed.

Bondi, Australia – Stab Magazine, a fun and irreverent surf publication/website, died on Wednesday. It was 12.

Its death was announced with the story EVERY MEN’S WCT EVENT IN 2015 WAS WON ON FCS FINS on its website.

Stab was best known for its affable manner and stylish mode of dress. Surfers loved its inventive photo shoots, including attaching rockets to the back of boards and towing into Teahupo’o blindfolded. Fans loved the humor, wit, high performance action, homoeroticism, naked girls and cartoons.

“I always tried to do material that fit me,” the magazine told surf historian Matt Warshaw in 2008. “I’d do a variety of material – ballads, up-tempo, and even bluesy stuff – but I stayed the same. I tried to give the fans the kind of stories they had come to expect. I think that was the reason for such success.”

Stab was born in Bondi, Australia, a suburb of Sydney, and lived its entire life there, frolicking in the warm waves and enjoying delicious $50.00 avocado toast. Toward the end it was purchased by online surf retailer Surfstitch who also purchased wave forecasting website Magic Seaweed and removable fin system FCS.

The death announcement said, in part, “Here’s a thing you probably didn’t know: In 2015, every Men’s WSL World Tour event was won by a surfer riding a set of FCS fins. Eleven events, 11 wins on FCS rudders.”

It is survived by Australia’s Surfing Life and Tracks.

Load Comments

Dane Reynolds Craig Anderson

Opinion: Why Quiksilver Failed!

…and why you can't start a surf co with less than two million American dollars… 

The only thing surprising about Quiksilver’s filing for bankruptcy is that it took this long to happen.

The company has been losing money for eight straight years – all the cut and tuck maneuvers, the restructuring, the sell off of brands that weren’t essential to the core business – all those correct decisions did not solve the bigger problem facing the brand, indeed the industry as a whole, which was lack of demand for the look.

In reality, the critical mass of the surf industry began to fragment in 2005, resulting in a steady decline in revenues and earnings that only began stabilizing in the last few years.

The reason for this was the mall customer, (the aspirant customer that grew the surf industry’s footprint initially), shifted out of surf looks and into a mosaic of different looks: street, urban, athletic, contemporary, outdoor, vintage, etc.

As a result, surf resources today are challenged not only by endemic competitors but also by competitors from these different genres.

The era of brands growing from $0 to $100 million in 10 or even 20 years is over. Today success lives in modest neighborhoods. The last gravy train to leave the station was RVCA

This fragmentation of taste and trend undermined the foundation of the industry’s business model forcing what was once a brand-centric environment to become commodity driven. Margins are down, quality is down and the level of design detail in fabrication and styling is nowhere near what it was 10 years ago.

The growth horizon for start-ups and small brands in general has shrunk considerably. The era of brands growing from $0 to $100 million in 10 or even 20 years is over. Today success lives in modest neighborhoods. The last gravy train to leave the station was RVCA.

When a small brand becomes ‘noticed’ and sells into key specialty stores nationally that normally means they’re doing around $2m – $5m annually at the most. When a brand is considered to have ‘arrived’ like say for example Roark, they are doing around $8m – $10m worldwide. And when a brand is considered to be ‘established and still growing’ like say Brixton, their sales are in the region of $15m – $20m.

When a small brand becomes ‘noticed’ and sells into key specialty stores nationally that normally means they’re doing around $2m – $5m annually at the most. When a brand is considered to have ‘arrived’ like say for example Roark, they are doing around $8m – $10m worldwide. And when a brand is considered to be ‘established and still growing’ like say Brixton, their sales are in the region of $15m – $20m. A quick way to establish brand size is whether they are factored or not. You can’t be factored doing less than $5m.

The baseline investment for a start-up in this environment is $2 million. Anything less the brand will fail. Most small brands will fail anyway but this has not seemed to discourage the numbers of start-ups because there is more than 2 times the number of brands in this space today than there was 10 years ago. The mortality rate is high – it takes a small brand 12 months on average to burn through the first $1m in seed capital.

In the early stages the only way for brands to get critical mass is to penetrate the specialty chain distribution – PacSun, Tilly’s, Buckle, Zumiez. And you need to be in at least two or three of them to get momentum.

Kids out of college have dreams in their minds and stars in their eyes thinking about being the next RVCA or Volcom but the cold hard truth is this is an industry with sub-=par margins and very little capacity – an industry devoid of comfort and chic with no low-hanging fruit because anything you can reach for is already picked clean.

Scaling a brand today is a very decentralized proposition. A decade ago the distribution channels were specialty stores, major stores and international. Today its specialty, specialty chain, department stores, sporting goods stores, outdoor stores, online retail,  own brand online, flagship retail, outlet retail, off-price SMU, international distributors, outside industry collaborations – it’s a complex matrix that’s very management intensive.

The surf industry today is more a lifestyle and less a career direction, than it’s ever been. Kids out of college have dreams in their minds and stars in their eyes thinking about being the next RVCA or Volcom but the cold hard truth is this is an industry with sub-par margins and very little capacity – an industry devoid of comfort and chic with no low-hanging fruit because anything you can reach for is already picked clean.

The winners of the future are the brands with a strong identity and a clear purpose. They are brands who stand for something and have recognizable core products they sell season after season.

That said the winners of the future are also those with the ability to respond to emerging trend and not allow those same core products to become a constraint to their brands to the point of ignoring newdirections because ‘that’s not who we are..’

Anything can work depending on how it’s interpreted

Read more of MT’s insightful stories, as well as sharp biz advice here. 

 

(Michael Tomson is a South African-born former pro surfer who started the game-changing surf clothing label Gotcha, grew it to $65 million, sold it and now lives in Laguna Beach where he writes, consults, cocktails, and enjoys frequent visits from BeachGrit.)

Load Comments

Mental Test: What Would You Do?

Three different surf scenarios involving kooks, kids and junkie shitbags that beg your opinion… 

I learned a cool new term today, engagement marketing. It’s, essentially, when a company tricks consumers into believing they’re contributors. Make ’em feel like they’re part of the brand, more than just a potential source of revenue.

Pretty clever, if you can make it work.

Why spend effort, or money, on something you can convince people to do for free?

I mean, yeah, in the end you probably get what you pay for, but, luckily, the bar is set ever lower as more and more people embrace the crowdsourcing movement.

It’s something we at BeachGrit stumbled onto more or less accidentally. Somehow ended up with a nice little community of commenters, most of whom have at least half a brain rattling around inside their respective skulls. Which, in the context of the internet, is pretty damn impressive. We’re turning into some sort of misanthropic aquatic Algonquin Round Table. I get a real kick out of it.

So I was thinking, rather than write something, which is kind of difficult, I’ll just pose some open ended questions to y’all, which is easy. This way you’re not just commenting on an article, you are the article.

Truly engaged! And, no, we will not be paying anyone.

Maybe it’ll fall flat and everyone will just tear me to shreds. No big deal, I can pretend it never happened. In a few days it’ll get pushed off the front page, and everyone will forget about it. Which is a beautiful thing when you do poorly, though I’ll admit it kind of sucks on that rare occassion you think you’ve done well.

Here’s the first installment of What Would You Do? If it works you’ll see more. If it doesn’t, oh well, I’ll have to keep digging through my many notebooks of “ideas,” which mainly consist of grocery lists I forgot to bring to the store and cryptically illegible notes I wrote while under the influence of some sort of intoxicant.

Scenario #1

It’s an amazingly fun, ultra-consistent, head high day at your local spot. Only a few guys out, one of those times everyone is having a blast, fallen into a perfect rotation. Taking turns, hooting for each other, getting to actually live the lie that is a beginner’s notion of the sport.

You surface to him losing his shit. “You fucking kook, that was assault! I’m gonna call the cops! If my board’s dinged you have to pay for it!”

Out paddles a total stranger. He makes a beeline for the peak, gives you full-on eye contact, turns and burns you from arm’s reach on the first wave that rolls through. Falls in front of you on the drop, makes you to tangle up and share a mellow little drubbing.

You surface to him losing his shit. “You fucking kook, that was assault! I’m gonna call the cops! If my board’s dinged you have to pay for it!”

You ignore the guy, reel in your board and paddle back out. He follows, continuing to scream.

What would you do?

Scenario #2

It’s Saturday morning and you’re about to leave the house for your kid’s soccer game when a friend texts you a photo of your local spot just completely going off. Next message reads, “Get here now. Best I’ve ever seen.”

You only signed him up because the school counselor said a team sport might help alleviate some of his “behavorial issues.” It’s not working though, he’s still a little prick.

Your kid is terrible at soccer, hates the game, doesn’t really care if you go. Would rather not attend himself. You only signed him up because the school counselor said a team sport might help alleviate some of his “behavorial issues.” It’s not working though, he’s still a little prick.

But today it’s your turn to bring the orange wedges and Hi-C. If you no-show you’ll catch a ton of shit from all the try-hard parents at the next practice.

What would you do?

Scenario #3

Your junkie shit-bag neighbor steals all the boards from under your house. You call the cops to report it, but they don’t give a shit and refuse to do anything.

Your junkie shit-bag neighbor steals all the boards from under your house. You call the cops to report it, but they don’t give a shit and refuse to do anything.

A month later you’re driving through town when you see one of the missing boards for sale outside a local shop. You pull over, go inside, and tell the manager. He calls you a liar. Swears he knows, for a fact, the board isn’t stolen. Accuses you of being a scammer. Things get heated, he orders you to leave the store.

What would you do?

Load Comments