“The only thing that made me do it was the fear of dying. There’s no one up there to help you."
Two Australian surfers have been awarded bravery medals after tackling and choking the hell out of a hijacker armed with what he told passengers was a bomb, but which would turn out to be Bluetooth speakers.
The surfers, Troy Joyner and Fabio Contu, were on a Malaysian Airlines bird out of Melbourne and en route to Indo to hit the “swell of the decade” when Sri Lankan Manodh Marks ran past ‘em to the cockpit yelling, “I’ve got a bomb!”
Joyner, a military guy who knew how to disarm explosives, told his buddy a terrorist was about to bring down the bird.
Contu, who was enjoying the airline’s award-winning entertainment system via headphones, wasn’t convinced.
“Troy tapped me and said, ‘He’s got a bomb’. I was like, ‘You’ve heard him wrong. He’s probably going to the toilet’. He’s like, ‘I know what I heard’.
Marks tried to get into the cockpit but was forced back by flight attendants.
As he got near the Australians, Joyner grabbed the cunt and threw a choking arm around his neck, soon extinguishing consciousness.
On the ground, Contu lifted Marks’ singlet.
“I pulled his shirt up and there’s this big round plastic thing staring at me with wires coming out of it. I put my hand on it and went ‘stuff it’. I ripped it off him and it didn’t go off. I gave it to a passenger and said to put it at the back of the plane. Troy had him choked out. He was out cold so I searched him for a trigger. There was a phone so I took that off him, too. We handcuffed his hands and his feet with cable ties and secured him to the frame of a seat so he couldn’t move.”
Obvs, choking out a crazy man with bluetooth speakers taped to his guts is funny now, but terrifying in the moment.
“The only thing that made me do it was the fear of dying,” says Joyner. “There’s no one up there to help you. You either help yourself or let it take its course.”
Not that it scared ‘em enough to stay off planes.
“We got on a flight the next day,” Joyner, who along with Contu will be awarded an Australian Bravery Decoration, says. “Got the waves of our life.”
Marks got twelve years for the hijack attempt although the Victorian Court of Appeal subsequently reduced the sentence to eight years at the top, five at the bottom.

Commented on Disqus? Log out, tap the Disqus button, and your old name and comments come back. The box is ours.
Your comments are still here. Every one of them.
Twelve years of BeachGrit comments came across from Disqus. Connect and we will show you how many are yours. We get your username, nothing else.
Connect Disqus to reveal.
“award winning entertainment system” so good
I would have opened the cockpit doors and chucked the devices out.
What about the surfing?
Fuck yeh boys!
Fly these lads in to the Parko brawl.
obligatory:
Prepared for Terries
“Grabbed the cunt.”
More questions than answers.
And here I thought only Trump engaged in that act…
That turned out to be a cock and balls. Didn’t phase him.
So what year was this? Definitely no “swell of the decade” on the horizon.
2019, yes?
DR do you often fantasise about being in situations like this where you can demonstrate your MMA skills? I bet you do don’t you. Would you have employed the same hold?
Only if the Whoop suggested it.
I have a mortal fear of dying in a nursing home so, yeah, I do dream of being caught up in some Jihadist event. Ideally, I throw myself over little children, taking the fusillade while they play dead and survive.
Noble! As long as it’s not a cover for piling onto children for sport
Epstein?
I also hate kids who blast their bluetooth speakers on public transport.
Clearly this was case of miscommunication. The Bluetooth speakers was his perstonal sound system, and he wanted to share his newly-found dope beat with his mate up front. Perhaps shouting “I’ve got a bomb!” was unwise but clearly it was about a ‘bomb choon’, as the kids say.
Or perhaps it was in refence to the surf report he was listening to and the ‘Bomb Swell’ headed to his chosen surf resort destination.
People are always Russian to judgment about innocent acts of violence.
Well done
Maybe he actually said, I got a banger! as he cued up Losing It or Just Feels Tight.
Or held his sausage aloft.
12 years?!?! seems light
Likely, five with parole.
Nuts 🥜
You are blaming a nut allergy?
Possibly.
Legends!
Bernie Goetz approves!
Pity Parko wasn’t on the plane…
When was this? Pre COVID? Been a while since Aussies went to Indo to get the waves of their lives
2017
90210
Reduced sentence for terrorism? How progressive.
Biden has nominated a terrorist defender for the U.S. Supreme Court. Ketanji Brown Jackson.
Jackson previously worked as a public defender in Washington, D.C., from 2005 to 2006.
During that time, her cases included work on behalf of Khi Ali Gul, a now-former prisoner at Guantánamo Bay, in the case Khi Ali Gul v. Bush. Jackson listed the case as one of the 10 most significant of her career in her responses to the Senate Judiciary Committee’s questionnaire for her Supreme Court nomination.
She of course stated she had no control over who she had to defend. Sounds all fine and good, right?
Bullshit! That bitch then chose to defend them.
Jackson continued to work on behalf of Gitmo terrorists after returning to private practice, working on Supreme Court amicus briefs in cases related to Guantánamo Bay detainees including Boumediene v. Bush, on behalf of groups supporting challenging the Defense Department’s detention review system.
I hope this nomination is choked out in the Senate. She doesn’t deserve a seat on that bench.
haha, I bight , so the Gitmo terrorists as you call them had already been found guilty by whom ?
So the detention system you have in Gitmo is an American Prison where all the detainees have access to USA Law?
Are you fucking kidding?!!!
What? You think these fuckers were captured and extracted out of Afghanistan because of the fashion crime of wearing man-jammies?!
You’re quite the terrorist apologist aren’t you now?
They were veteran insurgents with known ties to cells, including the 9/11 cell. In fact, thanks to Fucktard Obama’s Gitmo Review Task Force, we now have prior insurgents in the Taliban running Afghanistan. Real bang up job Obama, you fucker.
Sure they have access to public defender.
There wasn’t/isn’t an innocent piece of shit in Gitmo. None of them are innocent! None!
It is unacceptable to have a Supreme Court Justice that CHOSE to defend those guilty fucks in Gitmo.
Judicial Activism is unacceptable. Especially on the US Supreme Court.
I think the ones left are mentally in poor health from their stay. May even not be able to stand trial…?
Nope. You’re just thinking of the “20th 9/11 Hijacker” that Biden released March 7th to Saudi Arabia from custody as a law of war detainee. More proof that Obama is really running this Administration. That fucker hates America.
What a bunch of bullshit. He’s mentally competent. Obama just wants to rub salt in the wound.
https://uploads.disquscdn.c…
Project what you are capable of to frame your political advisary of the same thing
https://uploads.disquscdn.c…
Agree, lets get rid of Bork, Gorsuch, Thomas and the relatively new white frat guy
tell me what you really think , LOL!
So who arrested the Afghans?
Were the Afghans able to challenge the the intelligence gathered on them in a USA court?
So as they haven’t been found guilty they have the presumption of innocence under U S law , but you have found them guilty……hmmm , I think that’s called hypocrisy…..or worse …..one rule for us , one rule for them….
So now Afghanistan is run by Afghans….as it always has been!
LOL, but that president has been whitewashed from memory, his own party wont invite him to the national convention, completely ghosted for the snake oil Carnie.
Due process suspended in a time of “war”
Next time I’m busted I’m going full dark fake tan before the court
Next time?
try orange!
https://uploads.disquscdn.c…
Gosh it was easy, just get the head guy in debt and apply pressure
Bathe the orange skin in golden showers.
They own his ass.
You ever wonder why NY wont vote for their own citizen, but Alabama will?
A few reasons:
1) white dominionist evangelicalism hasn’t taken over NY state;
2) NY state funds public education (see here #1);
3) no religion of the lost cause;
Yes, but i still find it odd that an entire party that was insulted by the failed businessman got in line to walk lockstep?
Cucks, every last one.
Thats how bad the religious south hated the tan president
Occam’s razor: at the highest level, kompromat and dark money, both, from Russia. At the highest to the local level, a party of hate. A toxic brew. We smell its aroma on here, even.
We get it, you hate the ideas of justice, democracy, universal human rights, free speech and mobility rights. Just do us a favour and stop citing these ideas next time you deem your “rights” infringed upon. Thanks!
We’re a Constitutional Republic. The job of a Supreme Court Justice is to determine if a law or ruling is Constitutional. That is all. I’m a Constitutional Originalist, as are conservatives on the Court. Progressives on the Court believe the Constitution is a “living document”. It’s not. What the framers meant then should be strictly construed. Progressives don’t believe that. In order to achieve that, they must be activists.
I hate a pure democracy. That’s mob rule and is not what this country is founded upon.
Your comment makes no sense.
So you’re against the second amendment now? Shit even if you’re changing the conversation to something you want to talk about you’re inconsistent.
Again, all I’m asking is for you to spare us your constant whining and virtue signalling.
What the fuck are you talking about? There’s nothing I’ve said that would indicate I’m against the second amendment.
That’s a fucking retarded conclusion. Can’t wait to hear your explanation that actually isn’t one.
I’ll comment whatever I want pal. Deal with it.
Sure you did. You said you’re an originalist, however an amendment is essentially a correction of the original. Again, I’ve long gotten used to your inconsistencies. It’s the constant whining and virtue signaling that are truely annoying.
That’s not what Constitutional Originalism means ya dimwit.
In the context of United States law, originalism is a concept regarding the interpretation of the Constitution that asserts that all statements in the constitution must be interpreted based on the original understanding “at the time it was adopted.”
Originalism is an interpretive theory that understands a legal text to retain the meaning it had at the moment when it was enacted or ratified, until such time as the law is amended or repealed.
Enacted or Ratified.
The only people here who are virtue signalling are you all. DHMF, etc
Jesus that’s even worse than what I thought. So you rely on people not just to interpret the constitution, but to interpret the constitution based on their understanding of the intent of the original authors. This sounds awfully similar to the job of the Ayatollahs in Iran. On second thought it makes sense. You share a lot of values and views, as well as a tendency for whining and virtue signalling.
Gosh your dense. The plain meaning of the words provide you the intent.
It takes a Democrat to read meaning into words that isn’t there.
You clearly don’t get the framework of the US government and how it’s Founding documents operate.
Democrats would rather there be no Constitution.
Spoken like a true theocrat. Thankfully we have you to guide us, and provide the whining and virtue signalling?
Do you even know what a theocrat is? Cause you sure seem to be trying your best to prove to me you don’t.
Come on Ottz, at least be honest to yourself. There’s basically a dogs fart between you and a Taliban or a Revolutionary Guardian. Maybe the texts you worship are different and you call the ones interpreting the scripture differently, but at the end of the day you’re just another theocratic fundamentalist trying to impose your beliefs on society with utter disregard whether the majority agrees with you or not. That and all the whining and virtue signalling is always a dead giveaway too.
Geez that’s a whopper of a false equivalency.
Democrats love mob rule and imposing their beliefs on society. Take for example the whole transgender movement. Leave it to Democrats to push the narrative that freaks with a mental disorder are actually normal and should be allowed to crush all advancement of women’s equality in sports.
You’re projecting pal, and clearly don’t get why a Constitutional Republic is preferred to a Democracy.
Ha… now you’re just listing the overlaps in your ideology with that of the Taliban. Even
managed to squeeze in some virtue signalling!
Anything else you want to share?
fuuuucking ballzy work those lads.
10/10
…do they always travel with cable ties?
It’s my understanding that most planes have them for just such an occasion, genius.
Or if engine loosens and brave surfer has to climb out onto wing to secure.
I do – I put them through the loops in the zip toggles – way more obvious if someone has tampered with your stowed luggage and you know not to touch it at the other end as opposed to locks that can be picked and re-closed
the “bogan bracelets” and gaffe tape are standard issue for hostess since cashed up FIFO workers figured out they could get passports. usually reserved for drunk and disorderly passengers who are making the most of the free booze.
8,2 if the woozle is judging it. a little sloppy on the landing.