Master troll Kelly Slater swings hard at Oasis
catching die-hard music fans by surprise.
After a self-imposed social media exile totalling five
months (see: “Kelly Slater puts Greek foil
boarder to the sword over incorrect caption in wild online debate”
from February), the greatest surfer ever has
emerged online to launch a broadside at Brit icons Oasis.
Oasis, of course, was the Manchester
outfit formed in 1991 and headed by the Gallagher brothers Liam and
Noel. Liam, pretty as a peach, hung off the microphone
while Noel strummed a semi-acoustic guitar and wrote catchy
Beatle-esque songs.
Both appeared to be cunts most of the time, to use the British
vernacular.
Their first two albums Definitely Maybe (1994) and (What’s the
Story) Morning Glory (1995) defined a generation, as they say. Go
to an aged person’s birthday party and Wonderwall and Don’t Look
Back in Anger are still getting the over-45s all riled up.
Now, following the posting of a live performance of Oasis on
Instagram on an obscure pop art account, Kelly Slater has launched
an attack on the band that has music aficionados furiously popping
fingers on keyboards.
Kelly Slater writes:
“You mean to post Nirvana ‘spells (sic) like teen spirit’,
right? Then Pearl Jam ‘Ten’. Oasis wasn’t life changing whatsoever
for anyone I knew but those guys were. Liam Gallagher just used to
get drunk and miss concerts.”
Music fans, apoplectic.
“This thread perfectly demonstrates how the average music
listener views art as competition. There’s no need to compare them
to the Beatles or list bands that were better in your
opinion… they did their thing, brought a lot of joy to people,
and their songs continue to be relevant.”
“Rare miss on that take homie.”
“Woaaah terrible take.”
“What position do you imagine you hold to say that they weren’t
life changing for anyone? Maybe not for you but a quarter of a
million people who met in one space to see them at Knebworth would
probably disagree. It’s obviously fine to hold an opinion on a
subjective art form, but don’t project your opinions on to other
people or state them as facts, because they’re not.”
“Nirvana is ok and Pearl Jam sucks. Oasis rules. I’m
American.”
“Fuck off yank.”
After one commenter correctly pointed out that “Kurt Cobain
didn’t show up for many concerts either did he?” Slater delivers
his trademark coup de grâce.
“Good point. Probably didn’t. But Nirvana (shits emoji) on
Oasis.”
On and on, as you can imagine.
The owner of the page wrapped up the debate thus:
“Can’t believe how much this Reel has riled people up. I get it
Oasis we’re not everyone’s cup of tea but you cannot deny that them
along with Blur, Pulp, the Verve, Radiohead etc ruled the 90s
mainstream music scene in Britain. For me they were the 1st band
that I was obsessed with followed by many others. They put me onto
The Beatles, The Rolling stones, Stone Roses. They made me realise
how much I loved music. I’m now lucky enough to say that I love all
genres of music. I would struggle not to find a song I liked no
matter the genre. Genre phobes are seriously missing out on so much
good music man. Just drop the ego and let the soul like what
resonates with it. Music is supposed to bring people together not
make them fight over who is right when in fact none of you’s are
right. You just like what you like and that’s that. Anyways chill
out and spread the love.”
I believe in absolutes and have always counted Pearl Jam fans as
suspect morally and prone to the sort of dark sexual deviancies
practised by Republicans and not the joyfully out and wanton
behaviour of the left.
Nirvana, very good, howevs.