The sudden deification of a man-eater…
Have you ever wondered how great whites became the New Whale? And how, in the small Australian coastal town of Ballina, a swarm of great white attacks could be met, not with the proven solution of stringing a few hundred metres of nets across each beach, but with government hand-wringing and absurd solutions such as drone surveillance?
Vic Peddemors, the chief shark researcher at the NSW Department of Primary Industries, is an example of the mindset that constantly resists suggestions to make the ocean safer for people.
In a TEDx talk called “Sharks or humans, who should be afraid?” in Canberra in 2012, he jokingly described the two fatal attacks in Western Australia that year as a “bumper season”. Some members of the audience nervously laughed along with him. He added that the toll was an “anomaly” and “next year it will be back down to the normal levels that we would expect”.
Peddemors’ reassuring prediction was incorrect. At least four people have been killed by sharks in WA since then. Three unexplained disappearances might also have been caused by sharks, although we will never know.
Last year I emailed Peddemors, asking him if he regretted the insensitivity of the “bumper season” remark, but he never replied. Peddemors was making more predictions last week, telling the Australia-wide youth radio station Triple J that nets in Ballina would have an unacceptable toll on marine mammals.
“He predicts that rolling them out on the north coast would kill 20 dolphins within weeks,” the station reported.
Queensland statistics suggest Peddemors is exaggerating. Only eight dolphins were killed in that state’s 28 nets, spread out from Cairns to the Gold Coast, in all of 2015. Peddemors also said that great whites are “certainly not attracted” to humans. But a horrific incident in South Africa in 2013 disputes this. A fifteen-foot-plus great white took a snorkeler from the shallows at Jeffreys Bay (where Australian pro surfer Mick Fanning was attacked last year) into deeper water.
After the alarm was raised, a man on a kayak paddled out to try to retrieve what was left of the victim’s body. But the shark would not let the body go, despite the kayaker hitting it with his oar.
There are many other incidents where the victim is never recovered, which contradicts Peddemors’ claim that great whites are not interested in killing or eating humans.
Glen Folkard, who survived an attack in Newcastle in 2014, says he believes great whites retreat after making an initial strike and simply wait for the victim to bleed to death, which explains why some victims are given a brief opportunity to escape, as Folkard himself did, albeit with injuries that still cause him physical and psychological pain today.
Peddemors last week also participated in a video debate organised by Coastalwatch, a surfing website. In it he gave a rare insight into the objectives of the federal Great White Recovery Plan, devised in 2002 and revised in 2012.
“Geneticists believe there were probably 30,000 white sharks in the (Australian) population long before we arrived on this continent, and that it was stable at that level for thousands of generations,” he said. He estimated the current population is fewer than 6000, implying that we are only a fifth of the way back to the ideal population.
It’s curious that Peddemors is so confident of an estimate from an unspecified period in history yet decades of research by him and others has still not arrived at a definitive population figure today.
Peddemors’ main strategy has been an expensive and potentially dangerous program of tagging sharks. But the deleterious effects of this strategy are considerable. Tags can be heard by the sharks’ prey; and they have been known to cause injury and irritation to sharks.
Besides, a report by the West Australian Department of Fisheries earlier this year made the startling discovery that great white behaviour is “highly variable… white sharks were observed travelling along the WA coast in both directions at most times of the year”. It also found that “it is unlikely that a greater period of data collection will generate an overall predictive model”.
While he continues to promote increased tagging in an unlikely attempt to be able to predict shark behaviour, Peddemors’ advice to surfers, according to Hack, is to buy a shark repellant.
“Stop asking the government, stop asking council, stop asking everyone else, to look after your own safety, look after yourself.”
If it sounds like satire, it isn’t.
Meanwhile, after two great white attacks at Ballina in a week, the NSW government suddenly reversed it’s no-shark nets policy. Sanity, sometimes prevails.
Research perpetuates more research, which means more funding. Quantifiable data is a byproduct of a salary taking individual substantiating their funding. The data only being in belief long enough for the next funded researcher to come along and secure money’s to disprove said data. It’s laughable to me.
Yeah Fred! Fuck those experts and the horse they rode in on! Here in Brexit Britain we’ve finally done away with the charlatans, and rightly so. A baying mob armed with five minutes of googling and a baffled sense of entitlement or someone who has wasted decades learning about things? I know which way I’d vote
Here is my take on what I have read, what seems to be science and then opinion of fellow surfers – and just some thoughts!!
1) seems to be more sharks hence prevalence of attacks – i.e protection of species – just numbers
2) appears to be perfect storm on NSW far north coast – a ban on commercial fishing I thought read?? might be wrong, so maybe actually more food to support more sharks as well??. Then also there are more bays and coves and general shelter for sharks to hunt in stealth.
3) I live between Sydney and Port Macquarie – they believe whites breed in Port Stephens, I have seen them and big, my mates have been chased in but other than I think 2 years ago ( redhead) has not really been attacks – even though they breed in area!!
4) My theory on this is that along those beaches of long sand stretches there is not the shelter and stealth ability for sharks to “sneak up” on prey – maybe that changes at the dawn or dusk period when sun is low!!
5) These sharks seem to follow the bait fish schools and the other prey hunting them. SO MAYBE A BETTER PLAN IS TO TRACK BAITFISH SCHOOLS THAN TRACK SHARKS.
6) If we know as surfers where baitfish is prevalent then perhaps increased risk in surfing
7) I honestly don’t think they hunt us – we are slow easy prey and unlucky.
8) I would like to know the time of day of all the recent attacks – am thinking again it is dusk and dawn stuff – surfer at Kiama NSW def was late, thought Japanese guy taken was early???
9) I am avoiding the dawn and dusk surf now – unless off its head good!!
10) Cull may be way to go??
11) Fuck any of the so called repellants as any signal degrades every 1/2 m. if they want you then this wont stop em. you may as well piss that money up the wall.
last couple attacks in ballina were mid morning.
ok – thinking about the long sand stretches for stealth whereas Ballina river mouths etc- just thoughts.
Baitfish I reckon key trigger
who knows? byron/lennox marine reserve probably got something to do with it, look at reunion.
Tagging baitfish could prove difficult
yes walked into that nice, however did not say tag said track!! point is they already spending coin on drones to track tagged sharks why not use same tech to monitor bait fish schools
Stranger things have happened, Storm Boy.
Give a few fillets from a young, tender great white to a chef like Neil Perry, Seas Nail, and you’d be in for the coolest Sunday breakfast in town. Bon appetit.
Actually, Storm Boy, I was thinking my next campaign should be coal-fired cars. The smugness of the people who drive those enviro-killing machines shits me to tears. Cheers.
Absolute gutter journalism Fred. Nets NEVER work. Would it hurt you to review the literature? Here are some scientifically proven methods of killing sharks:
1. scuba tanks + spear guns.
2. chainsaws.
3. leaving the stove on and throwing a cigarette lighter.
4. bits of anchors.
5. reentering Earth’s atmosphere.
You forgot “Bikini Girls with Machine Guns”.
I like the slant of your article. We just had an attack in the area I surf (Gaviota), and it sure seems like we have a population that is on the rise.
Thanks Smidge. It shouldn’t be so difficult to convince authorities that there is a link between protection, abundance and attacks by sharks. Sadly, the link between batty environmentalism and poor policy is just as obvious. We live in strange times.
“Fuck Fred”? Oh the hate from the left for differing opinions is funny.
You can tell by the contextual clues and and general subtext that the man meant, “Fuck, Fred.” As in, “for fucks sake, Fred.” Anyway, I’m not able to see how you arrived at the conclusion that he’s a dirty leftist and further unable to ascertain how that revelation would have a direct bearing on this issue. ?
WHITE CONSERVATIVE MEN ARE CONSTANTLY UNDER ATTACK IN THE US!!!! Or haven’t you heard?
That’s it, time to take down the nets keeping white men out of the political and entrepreneurial mainstream.
Audit we prefer “Deplorables”
Hugh my interpretation was he was more worried about the sharks then the people i.e. a leftist greeie. If that went over my head and I got it wrong my bad sorry bru.
Don’t apologise Smidge, you’re right as far as you went. He’s an odious, simpering, smug, Leftist.
‘But is there any other kind?’ you say. ‘It was clearly implied.’
In that case, my apologies to you, sir.
Fred what’s your proposal? It is unclear to me what the solution is.
Simple, wincy ol son: reduce the number of sharks. Just remember if you ever argue this position at a dinner party, don’t call this strategy “culling”. Instead, describe it as “fishing”.
So…
Do you ever consider… reduce human number?
Ah…oh… it’s on march… “some points in certains continents”… no?
And use the adjective “delicious.”
Hi Fred, thanks for responding. I personally love not being bitten by sharks so please do not assume I am insane and love death due to me questioning your strategy. However would it not be important to propose a number of sharks to reduce the total to? And, if we reduce the average fatalities to 2, which is the likely minimum, is that acceptable? How many deaths is ok? And what if we find that 3000 Australian Great Whites kill 6 people? Do we reduce the number to 1500? Kind regards, Wince.
Actually right now all of the six thousand great white sharks are at North Wall at Ballina, so do the math on that!
They’ve got no idea how many whites there are now and they didn’t have a clue when they decided to protect the bloody things