Opinion: Laird and Healey are wrong!

Does research mean anything?

As a younger man I spent copious amounts of time in the middle east. Lebanon, Yemen, Somalia, Syria, Egypt, Palestine and with terrorists. Or at least what we here in the west define as “terrorists.” Hezbollah, Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, Hamas, Al-Qaeda, The Muslim Brotherhood, etc. I drank tea, chatted, laughed, argued, disagreed and was once nabbed and thrown into a blood-stained dungeon then interrogated for almost ever.

Do I know what’s going on in the mind of a terrorist?

Fuck no.

Do Laird Hamilton and Mark Healey, who have spent copious amounts of time in the ocean and with sharks, know what’s going on in the mind of that predator?

Fuck no.

Their claim that menstruation leads to an uptick in shark attack because it kind of makes sense and/or they have seen sharks sniffing girls in the water has simply not been corroborated by any study whatsoever. Zero studies. None. And shall we read from a shark doctor on Broadly?

We asked Dr. Tricia Meredith, who literally wrote the book on the olfactory response of sharks. For her dissertation, she hooked sharks up to a device that introduced controlled amounts of prey odors (smells associated with a shark’s next meal) into a shark’s nose, then measured the electrical impulses in their nasal cavity. She weakened the concentration of these prey odors to determine how diffuse an odor a shark could still pick up. Dr. Meredith found that sharks can detect prey odors as minute as one part per billion—still superhuman, but not better than other fish with similar schnozzes. One part per billion is roughly the background scent level of the ocean. If a shark’s sense of smell was any better they would be flooded with stimulus, the olfactory equivalent of those people who can’t deal with the sound of chewing.

There is one sensory arena where sharks excel, but it isn’t smell. Sharks are incredibly electroreceptive, meaning they can detect teeny tiny electromagnetic fields in water. Sharks possess a science fiction-y and awesomely-named organ called the ampullae of Lorenzini, which are pores, located on the snout, that end in jelly-filled bulbs. These bulbs contain nerves that detect electric fields in the water as small as five millionths of a volt per centimeter. Sharks use the ampullae of Lorenzini to navigate the ocean and detect prey. All ocean-dwelling animals emit an electrical field: Muscle contractions release bioelectricity, and, as Dr. Kajiura says, “any animal in the ocean with a thin, leaky mucus membrane acts as a battery in seawater,” because of the differing pH levels inside and outside the animal. Dr. Kajiura was talking about gills, but “thin, leaky mucus membrane” could also double as the least sexy description of a vagina ever (and that’s including Martin Lawrence’s infamous SNL monologue).

So there you go. Maybe Laird and Healey are right. Maybe they have some kind of sixth sense born of time spent in the ocean and know what sharks are really thinking. Maybe the right study hasn’t been conducted yet.

And maybe I’ll be able to predict ISIS’s next move.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
49 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
SeverelyLtd
SeverelyLtd
9 years ago

Chas walks the PC line; I guess main stream surf journalism is just a junior version of the MSM. So much for the brave counter-culture viewpoint.

SeverelyLtd
SeverelyLtd
9 years ago

Not data, but I’ve noticed that a disproportionate number of women seemed to be attacked versus the number in the water.

James
James
9 years ago

BS GUYS STFU . A BUNCH OF GUYS ARE GOING TO GIVE ADVICE THAT COULD COST A WOMAN HER LIFE OR LIMBS ? THEY DON’T LET WOMEN ON THEIR PERIODS AROUND STALLIONS , PEOPLE GET HURT FAST, NO ONE KNOWS WHAT A MALE SHARKS SENSE IN THE WATERS OR A FEMALE FOR THAT MATTER .

f u
f u
9 years ago

Free publicity for Laird incorporated.

He dropped that comment knowing exactly how much attention it will get him.

janeausten
janeausten
9 years ago

CHAS!! Where can I get a massive print of that leader painting! Copyright?
[Just google-imaged ‘shark with naked girl in mouth’…you’ve got images for at least a year’s more articles]

Eddie Haiku
Eddie Haiku
9 years ago

Why wouldn’t the tampons speak to the sanitary pads? Coz they’re stuck up cunts.

longtom
longtom
9 years ago

ummm…..it’s actually the muscle contractions the shark is detecting through the “thin, leaky, mucous membrane”….

does the theory need finetuning?

huma's tears
huma's tears
9 years ago
Reply to  longtom

Indeed it does, by no less than the mansplaining scientists that make up the BG commentariat.

Once more unto the (ahem) breach . . .

Otto
Otto
9 years ago
Reply to  huma's tears

Long Live the Commentariat! Long Live BeachGrit!

Lemon Next to the Pie
Lemon Next to the Pie
9 years ago
Reply to  huma's tears

Misquote Mr. Tears. Churchill actually said “Once more onto the beach”. Dude was mad keen hotdogger back in the day.

Lance Carson
Lance Carson
9 years ago

If Lance Burkart is correct, we should love sharks! Even the meanest fish in the world understands a chick on the rag is an awful thing.

Jen See
Jen See
9 years ago

this is fucking hilarious really and i almost want to pitch a story on it and call a fuckton of science people but life is short so maybe not

Nick Carroll
Nick Carroll
9 years ago
Reply to  Jen See

I think if we just ignore it, it will go away.

Jen See
Jen See
9 years ago
Reply to  Nick Carroll

We can hope, right? Shit’s getting weird around here.

janeausten
janeausten
9 years ago
Reply to  Jen See

I think you feel how I used to feel when Nick Dee was in his heyday.
I used to write well reasoned, lengthy replies, but at the end of the day….? [ I would’ve liked to know how many a fuckton was, though.]

Jen See
Jen See
9 years ago
Reply to  janeausten

hella lots? something like that, anyway.

the weirdest thing about this is like, i literally never think about it. like ever. even when i was doing open water swimming in deep water on the regular. never. so i’m dumb maybe.

janeausten
janeausten
9 years ago
Reply to  Jen See

Same, and I’ve done some really long dumb paddles…but I do not have a vagina, though occasionally aching piles.

hunter biden pipe master
hunter biden pipe master
9 years ago
Reply to  janeausten

Thats too bad you don’t. You seem really down to earth in the comments you write

Jen See
Jen See
9 years ago
Reply to  janeausten

ha ha that made me snort espresso so that’s pretty great

eh i’m pretty sure most dudes have surfed with reef and fin cuts without getting chomped so

huma's tears
huma's tears
9 years ago

Not to disparage the good doctor (this is more a disparagement of the broad writing for Broadly), but the ability to smell something does not equate to the desirability of said smell. To wit, I can smell a sack of dog shit 100 feet away, as well as the smell of bacon. One smell keeps me away, another draws me in. The question is, are sharks interested in the smell of menstrual blood?

Chas Smith
Chas Smith
9 years ago
Reply to  huma's tears

100 ft? Is true?

huma's tears
huma's tears
9 years ago
Reply to  Chas Smith

I have a keen bacon detector.

Chas Smith
Chas Smith
9 years ago
Reply to  huma's tears

How quick do you smell a sack of dog shit posted on BeachGrit and how far away from your computer do you need to be?

huma's tears
huma's tears
9 years ago
Reply to  Chas Smith

No dog shit here, just bacon, bacon, bacon. I swear BG off for a day, and it draws me back in. The Fentanyl of surf blogs.

funky Gibbon
funky Gibbon
9 years ago
Reply to  Chas Smith

I think you just won my heart with that response.

blumpkin mung
blumpkin mung
9 years ago
Reply to  huma's tears

Broadly is absolutely horrible.

Joe Blowsmith
Joe Blowsmith
9 years ago

I give it a week before Sharkbanz unveils a new feminine hygiene product.

Lemon Next to the Pie
Lemon Next to the Pie
9 years ago
Reply to  Joe Blowsmith

Modem are working on a magnetic version as we type. Won’t make any difference to anything, but will feel fantastic.

Nick Carroll
Nick Carroll
9 years ago

Look. All you gotta do is track the last 100 years of shark attacks on the Global Shark Attack File. You will rapidly find that the vast majority of attacks, specially fatal ones, have occurred on….men. Do men menstruate? Maybe in their minds. But there’s truly no evidence whatsoever that shark attacks are brought on by female menstruation.

There is now however a significant body of evidence that discussing female menstruation leads to clickbait.

Otto
Otto
9 years ago
Reply to  Nick Carroll

Laird just uninvited you to…..everything Laird

Nick Carroll
Nick Carroll
9 years ago
Reply to  Otto

Rubbish! I’m on Laird’s team! I just wish we could have discussed this earlier.

Otto
Otto
9 years ago
Reply to  Nick Carroll

Discussing shark chickbait theory is not clickbait.

Nick Carroll
Nick Carroll
9 years ago
Reply to  Otto

I’m not disagreeing with that.

huma's tears
huma's tears
9 years ago
Reply to  Nick Carroll

You need to do a Laird intervention.

huma's tears
huma's tears
9 years ago
Reply to  Nick Carroll

But, of course, you must consider the proportion of men in the water vs. women cross-referenced by the locations of attacks?

Nick Carroll
Nick Carroll
9 years ago
Reply to  huma's tears

Yes, it’s a bit farcically similar to the proportion of men busily commenting on this topic of female menstruation vs women.

Student8888
Student8888
9 years ago
Reply to  Nick Carroll

I agree with you that female menstruation is not a factor. But I think the vast amount of attacks and fatal ones have occurred on men because… Well, there’s simply more men in the ocean don’t you think… Specifically the surfers and divers who were mauled. Sure there’s more women than ever in the lineup nowadays, but on a packed day at any given spot… It’s still 5-1 men at best.

Ami Lost
Ami Lost
9 years ago
Reply to  Nick Carroll

Shhh. We’re trying to stem the red tide of Blue Crush

SeverelyLtd
SeverelyLtd
9 years ago
Reply to  Nick Carroll

But take the relative of proportion of men to women in the water and your point pales. Especially when you put surfing in the equation. At your spot on an average day it’s likely at least 10:1 men to women unless it’s two foot. If it’s big, maybe no women.

Dogsnuts
Dogsnuts
9 years ago

So we are shaming sharks for being attracted to pussy?

huma's tears
huma's tears
9 years ago
Reply to  Dogsnuts

Hey, are you one of those SJWs? Shark Justice Warriors?

Dogsnuts
Dogsnuts
9 years ago
Reply to  huma's tears

Are you a Trump voter?

huma's tears
huma's tears
9 years ago
Reply to  Dogsnuts

I don the boardshorts adorning my comments without irony. (Hopefully the avatar won’t be changed to a sack of dog shit.)

Otto
Otto
9 years ago
Reply to  Dogsnuts

I am.

blumpkin mung
blumpkin mung
9 years ago
Reply to  Dogsnuts

Don’t know about this feline talk. They just love tuna.

hunter biden pipe master
hunter biden pipe master
9 years ago
Reply to  Dogsnuts

its not just the pussy; its the blood! its a damsel in distress thing

funky Gibbon
funky Gibbon
9 years ago

blood feud: laird vs menstrual cycles.

Neal Kearney
Neal Kearney
9 years ago
Reply to  funky Gibbon

I’ve been against ’em since day one!

Ami Lost
Ami Lost
9 years ago
Reply to  Neal Kearney

If Planned Parenthood didn’t get ya, a shark still might.


49
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x