Blame Australians (I think)!
I sometimes wonder how the world would be
different if I had been born smart. Could I have written a Pulitzer
prize winning book about The Surfing Life? Could I have discovered
the cure to some heretofore uncurable disease? Might I have been
able to write the phrase “…discovered the cure to some heretofore
uncurable disease…” without trying and failing to spell uncuralbe
six different ways before looking it up and realizing it’s
incurable thereby saving twenty-odd seconds?
We will never know because I was born me but if I had
been born smart, like super Ivy League smart, I can assure you that
I would have employed my brains to uncover inherent bias in World
Surf League Championship Tour judging.
Thankfully, Cornell’s Jojo Aboaf, who will graduate in three
years, is doing the Lord’s work and let’s go straight to The Cornell Daily
Sun for more on his findings.
According to Aboaf’s initial calculations, not only did the
scoring panel reflect traces of bias, but the application processes
and interviews did as well.
Aboaf also noted that “correlation does not equal
causation,” and said that other factors, like event location, might
also be relevant to his results.
He created his model by collecting data from the World Surf
League website sifted through thousands of data points and web
pages using a web scraper — an automated software that extracts
data from websites.
In 2018, there were 6,600 waves ridden over the course of
the entire competition circuit, Aboaf said, and was able to get
information on 6,300 of the wave time frames using his software.
Although Aboaf is very tentative on making decisive conclusions
because he is “a third of a way in[to]” his project, here’s what he
says he’s found so far:
“Most of the people who surf internationally in competitions
come from the US, Brazil, Australia, South Africa, Portugal and
France,” Aboaf said. “The judging panels are made up of that same
core, compact group of countries.”
As he delved deeper into his research, though, Aboaf
uncovered “nuances in statistics” that contradicted his earlier
predictions and further enriched his findings.
“The data might tell you that an Australian judge on average
gives Australian surfers higher scores than non Australian
surfers,” he said. “[But] you also have to analyze how Australian
judges perform generally speaking because Australian judges could
just like to give higher scores.”
“No matter what the outcomes are,” Aboaf said, “there needs
to be an emphasis on diversity on judging panels.” From the hiring
processes to the review boards, Aboaf deduced that “promoting
diversity in those contexts … reduces the chances that biases have
true effect.”
Aboaf hopes to publish his findings in an academic journal
and inspire Cornell students to take a critical eye to existing
systems.
Oh man, I’m so lost. Can you explain to me using what my
fifth-grade teacher called “li’l words?”
I’d be greatful.
Gratful.
Gratefull.
Happy.