Watch: Kelly Slater’s “huge concern” about Tokyo Olympics’ radiation risk, “Cancer rates in the country have skyrocketed and they’re not telling anyone!”

"It's a reality… and that's from friends of mine who live there and/or have moved out of the country because of it…"

Early last week, I enjoyed a breakfast with a movie industry heavyweight in the sitting room of a hotel in which Lonzo Ball had once stayed.

There were cigarettes on one table, flowers on another and a waiter serving strong and hot coffee. I felt like a young woman in the grip of a seducer who would reveal, shortly, the marvels of sex.

Instead, among other things, would I write a movie script etc, he told me of a meeting with Kelly Slater in which Kelly’s handler had advised that if he wanted to pique his interest, he should bring up conspiracy theories.

We laughed etc.

And it reminded me that sitting in my email box was a press release pointing me at Kelly’s interview with the sports reporter and wrestler Graham Bensinger where Kelly talks of the Japanese hiding “skyrocketing” cancer rates from its people.

True or no, it makes for exciting reading.

Watch or read excerpts below.

Slater discusses the environmental and ethical concerns facing Japan ahead of Tokyo 2020:

BENSINGER: What challenges do you think Japan has between now and the games in getting ready for surfing?
SLATER: Figuring out their radiation problem. That’s one. And making sure we got enough waves to surf. I don’t know. They probably don’t want me talking about that…But it’s a reality, and it’s actually not a laughing matter. The cancer rates in the country have skyrocketed. And they’re not telling people about that. And that’s from friends of mine who live there and/or have moved out of the country because of it.

BENSINGER: How concerned does that make you?
SLATER: I think it’s a huge concern. And for a surfer the Taiji Cove where they round up the dolphins and either kill them or sell them to amusement parks is another issue. So there’s a few things that I think won’t be sort of politically correct that are spoken about during the games and I think rightfully so, but that, you know, that brings up bigger topics around the world, around nuclear power, and captive animals, and the fact that we kill and eat so many animals around the world, and it’s something that we all need to be aware of and do something about I think.

Kelly Slater on Tokyo Olympics: Japan’s radiation problem
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
157 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
nyc surfing golden boy
nyc surfing golden boy
6 years ago

comment of the year

Brutus
Brutus
6 years ago

fuck c’mon Kelly , the USA has Donald Trump and you are worried about a couple of mammals and spike in cancer..look in your own backyard and get Trumped , USA go away!

Billy Hunt
Billy Hunt
6 years ago

next you’ll be telling us sea monkey’s aren’t real!

Numbnuts
Numbnuts
6 years ago

Guess you missed Maria on 60 minutes?

Jordy's pout
Jordy's pout
6 years ago

FACT: big pharma is corrupt; its only interest in improving medical science is so that it can exploit sick people for big profits
FACT: herd immunisation against widely-destructive diseases is fantastic

Just because big pharma is shit that doesn’t mean herd immunisation shit too.

Low wide stinkbug stance
Low wide stinkbug stance
6 years ago

Fracking doesn’t threaten public resources; it is a misrepresentation by environmental groups. The famous burning water town already had burning water prior to fracking.

Tom Toraja
Tom Toraja
6 years ago

Surely if KS was serious, he would be taking a stand!
Using his media profile and fame to say he will refuse to take part in a Japan Olympics because of the radiation/cancer risk and the fact that the fisherman of Taiji round up dolphins, pick out a few to be trained as circus like performers for profit, and slaughter the rest.
He didn’t mention the for ‘research’ whale hunts, but there is also that.
Talk is cheap!

KRIS
KRIS
6 years ago

… judging by the size of some of the monsters running amok (a-ruck) during the Rugby World Cup – I reckon slats may have a point!

SDRW
SDRW
6 years ago

So basically, “I didn’t want to go to Japan anyway”

Chief Hot stuff
Chief Hot stuff
6 years ago

Ive finally cracked it.
Climate scientists good!!!!
All other scientists, very very bad.!!!

Chief Hot stuff
Chief Hot stuff
6 years ago

Comment of the day!

kirra72 .
kirra72 .
6 years ago

Call me a cynic, but I think Kelly wants the Japanese to build a pool.

Billy Hunt
Billy Hunt
6 years ago
Reply to  kirra72 .

i hear TEPCO have got some water they can spare

Chief Hot stuff
Chief Hot stuff
6 years ago

You’re sick.

Billy Hunt
Billy Hunt
6 years ago

nice boobs bex. they new?

Chief Hot stuff
Chief Hot stuff
6 years ago
Reply to  Billy Hunt

Yeah, you like?

Billy Hunt
Billy Hunt
6 years ago

I’m all for self improvement

Nick Carroll
Nick Carroll
6 years ago
SectionSB
SectionSB
6 years ago
Reply to  Nick Carroll

Cancer death rate appears to be related to aging population yes?
Interesting that the stroke death rate peaked and dropped off in the 60’s
Low salt diet or better treatment?

Nick Carroll
Nick Carroll
6 years ago
Reply to  SectionSB

Also interesting is the sudden and quite dramatic uptick in suicide rates.

I wonder how many of the ageing cancer sufferers have problems related to the FUCKING ATOMIC BOMBING OF TWO OF JAPAN’S CITIES 74 year ago. Also could not possibly be related to the THERMONUCLEAR BLASTING THE SHIT OUT OF a bunch of Western Pacific atolls up the tradewind line.

Foamie Lord
Foamie Lord
6 years ago
Reply to  Nick Carroll

think you may be reading it wrong… “suicide” was blue line (fairly stable), uptick was “old age” (purple)

Chief Hot stuff
Chief Hot stuff
6 years ago
Reply to  Nick Carroll

If you get old you will die.

Nick Carroll
Nick Carroll
6 years ago

That’s a pretty fucken big “if” bex vidina.

Chief Hot stuff
Chief Hot stuff
6 years ago
Reply to  Nick Carroll

It’s all in the genes..
Otherwise you gotta have a boring ,healthy life like Slats.
Nightmare.
I’ll probly alter my gene lineage in one generation.
Prolly make it stronger.

James Bickerton
James Bickerton
6 years ago

Thank you for your honest reply Sea M .

SectionSB
SectionSB
6 years ago

I posted to frank about submerged offshore reefs, seems like a win win to me. Slow wave energy, get sand to drop inshore.

@surfads
@surfads
6 years ago

Just the same as Big Oil owns the automotive industry. I’ve done my own research and it turns out mechanics are actually just shills of Big Oil looking to turn a profit by filling my car with harmful stimulants. For example, petrol: did you know it’s actually bad for the environment? Mechanics! Thankfully I’ve found plentiful information online that confirms my own bias, which is why I now service my own car using organic bio products. Deal with it.

(Just joking, I wouldn’t mess with my car’s health like that)

Superworm
Superworm
6 years ago
Reply to  @surfads

Because electric cars are so much better for our planet, right?

Foamie Lord
Foamie Lord
6 years ago
Reply to  @surfads

Fuck, don’t me started on the whole climate change scam too

channelbottom
channelbottom
6 years ago
Reply to  Foamie Lord

Don’t get me started on the scam that is climate change denial.

Foamie Lord
Foamie Lord
6 years ago
Reply to  channelbottom

Agree – my tongue was very firmly planted in cheek.

channelbottom
channelbottom
6 years ago
Reply to  Foamie Lord

Thank goodness!

Chief Hot stuff
Chief Hot stuff
6 years ago
Reply to  channelbottom

I love climate change too.

velobwoy
velobwoy
6 years ago

But Sea Monkey! But, but …. Science!!

James Bickerton
James Bickerton
6 years ago

I have an open mind , and do not have shares in anything , never mind drug companies but lost an Uncle to Polio and another to Diphtheria .I never met them.They died in childhood in the late 1930s ,much to the sorrow of my grandparents before vaccinations to these formerly common childhood diseases were available …..

frank
frank
6 years ago

coastal armoring and sea walls don’t stop erosion of cliffs, in the long term; erosion continues and cliffs recede
besides the negative improvement to the natural environs, the are aesthetically ugly
my point is, why would I, as a surfer, support and ostensibly pay for something so counter to the thing I enjoy?

James Bickerton
James Bickerton
6 years ago
Reply to  frank

“The only constant in life is change”-Heraclitus.
This holds especially true for coastlines battered by wind and wave not to mention the constant but imperceptible movement of tectonic plates . Only our lack of longevity blinds us from seeing it . I spent 20 years observing the ocean consume between 40 to 60 m of frontal dune in my old village in South West France . We lost , the Block Hauses , ( I miss those A LOT ) along with the original lifesaving and surf school building into the sea and 25 years later it is now encroaching on the more recent construction built 10 years ago . There are some advantages …. it is now only 50 m from the carpark to check the surf …..

SectionSB
SectionSB
6 years ago
Reply to  frank

What about artificial offshore reef setups? Break the waves power down, allow sand sediments to then fall inshore? Always thought this was an obvious solution. Even if big winter storms come and scour the sand away, the outside reefs can still dissipate wave energy.


157
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x