Ouch.
It was, roughly, seven months ago when I
decided that the world’s greatest surfer, Kelly Slater, has likely
done more damage to
its environment than any living non-politician. A
harsh assessment, one I am neither qualified nor in any position to
make, but I had a feeling, you know, a gut instinct and today my
prescience was certified by ProPublica in a devastating
piece titled How Famous
Surfers and Wealthy Homeowners Are Endangering Hawaii’s
Beaches.
Oooooee.
ProPublica,
whose tagline is “keep them honest,” spilled roughly 15,000 words
describing how oceanfront homeowners have been erecting illegal
sandbag structures over the years that have not been regulated by
the state and have, in turn, led to massive beach erosion. The
homeowners argue without protection that their beautiful homes will
crash into the sea.
The news outlet talked to many on both sides of the debate
including our Kelly Slater and let us hurry to that section without
delay.
In 2018, Kelly Slater, an 11-time world surfing champion who
lives on Ehukai Beach by the world-famous Banzai Pipeline surf
break, illegally installed a burrito. He, as well as his neighbors,
were fined just $2,000.
Slater paid the fine and wrote to the Department of Land and
Natural Resources last year asking it to approve his illegal
structure so his home would be protected from future hurricane
surf, as well as unexpected and seasonal weather. Lemmo, in
response, rejected the request and underscored the seriousness of
the situation.
“Unfortunately, we have reached a tipping point in which
near complete loss of beach resources is a realistic future due to
sea level rise and the prevalence of [densely] urbanized shoreline
development,” he wrote to Slater, noting that the situation on the
North Shore is particularly precarious.
Lemmo added that if the state doesn’t enforce strict
policies controlling shoreline armoring “it could set in motion a
[domino] effect leading to chronic beach loss.”
Still, he left the door open to a future approval, inviting
Slater to submit additional information about the structure that
was installed and why it was needed. Lemmo said his office is still
waiting on the surfer to provide the details about his emergency
barrier, which has been in place for more than two years.
In a brief phone interview, Slater, known for his
environmental activism, said that without the sandbags people
“would have lost properties outright.” He did not respond to a
request for a follow-up interview.
Ouch.
So ouch that even I feel bad for the 11x World Champion and
would like to help him extract himself from the “known for his
environmental activism” bed of hypocrisy in which he is
uncomfortably tossing and turning. It is something I am both
qualified and in a position to do.
Kelly?
You have two ways out.
1) Double down on being a plutocrat. Your many fans accept your
superiority and would accept that you and your pals Dirk Ziff, Jeff
Bezos, Gavy Newsom etc. know best and are actually acting in The
People’s™ interest.
2) Follow me down the primrose path of “hyper-irony” where the
only thing that matters is thinking you, yourself, are funny. Then
you can actively continue to satirize both “environmentalist” and
“wealthy homeowner, wetland bulldozer to build Surf Ranches, etc.”
and call the whole thing a morality play.
I recommend number 2 but it’s totally up to you.