The Fijian Cabinet is set to review—and possibly end— 2010's Surfing Decree, a law which gave public access to Cloudbreak and Restaurants.
Fiji is paradise, yes? Floating sense drunk all day in the perfection of Tavarua or Namotu, it’s the goofy-footer’s Eden.
For the traveler it’s as fantastic as it is fleeting, like paint in a paper bag. And there’s always the itch to come back by hell or high water. But the means might narrow if some in the Fijian government have their way.
Next week, the Fijian Cabinet is set to review—and possibly end— the 2010 Surfing Decree, a law which gave public access to private spots such as Cloudbreak and Restaurants. Prior to 2010, if ya’ wanted to scratch your itch, you’d have to stay at privately-owned Tavarua.
You wanna surf Cloudbreak? You come through us.
Fijian politics is storied. There’s a history of conflicts on the pacific island chain with two universal hungers to blame: greed and ethnic tensions. In-fighting between the indigenous Fijians, or iTaukei, and Indo-Fijians, those brought over by colonial
England in the late nineteenth century to work the cane plantations. When the British coughed up its imperial rule in 1970, animosity between the two groups festered as property rights and usage issues proved too difficult to solve amicably. As a result came finger pointing, name calling, hair pulling, and a couple a coups.
In 2006, military boss Frank Bainimarama seized power from the elected government in a bloodless take-over motivated by these ethnic tensions and general corruption. In an attempt to boost the flow of foreign dollars into the hands of both groups, Bainimarama spearheaded the 2010 Surfers Decree by giving a shot to the surf-tourism industry, ending exclusivity rights to the few, thereby allowing any charter boat within a wave’s range to bring as many surfers as possible into the water. Cloudbreak and Restaurants, and similar waves were no longer private oases.
Power to the people! The many, oh, so many people.
Surf-tourism is bigger than ever on the Fijian Islands. Because the wave-front resorts no longer control access to the famous waves, stay anywhere you can find, rent a square on a boat, and chance the time of your stupid life. And you can do it cheaper than staying at one of the premiere hotels so guys and dolls like you and me can sport the bill without selling our children. It also spreads bucks into the hands of more native Fijians, indigenous and Indo.
On the negative, this open-door policy (no political discussions in the comments, please) has led to dangerous overcrowding.
Like Wade Carmichael in boardshorts.
Maybe more revealing is the perceived disrespect of the hoteliers shown to indigenous groups. Before the 2010 Decree, hotels were required to pay 5% earnings tribute to the Fijians. This was dropped in the Decree. Guess how much is reported to be given back now? Surprise! You guessed it.
So, who knows where the Cabinet’s review will lead. Maybe we’ll be forced to tunnel through a select few hotels again. Either way, bet that we’ll all be paying out the nose. (Of course, there are heaps of other breaks less advertised to check out.)
Whether the cost is a half-a-year rent payment or a forgettable card swipe for ya’, those waves furnish a lifetime of daydreams.
What about you?
Would you rather spend big money for a crowd-controlled wave like Cloudbreak or save some cash and wade around in the overcrowded sea of foam?
Good read Chazo!
Thanks, but it’s Rees
Got my attention now…
traveling surfers deserve their own privilege (tongue-in-cheek) and without structure every destination is a potential Fyre Island. that’s the ying & yang of it. the thrill of victory and/or the agony of defeat. fuck all accomodations included. buy the ticket, take the ride. but go solo, in deuces, or if lucky, get a menage a trois!
I am not taking a position either way, but your article is missing critical, key component of the dilemma. I’m told from someone is in a position to know that the foundation of the claim to exclusivity actually is related to an ancient tradition where a certain village has “rights” to a specific reef. This traditionally was for fishing rights, but in the early days the village which had those rights took the idea of what was theirs and extended it to surfing arguing the exclusivity was based on their proprietary interest in the reef. I have no details but what I’m told is the rationale for the, shall we say, the repatriatism (e.g. exclusivity), was based on the idea of “indigenous people-rights” kind of thing.
You nailed it. These people deserve to get paid, and cut down the douchebag numbers greatly.
I believe the words your looking for are Gulee gulee
I don’t know if I’m saying anything different, Paul. You’re talking about qoliqoli, yes? I was just trying to stick to a couple paragraphs. Thanks for adding to the info.
Hmm, well, I think there were some wealthy Californians in the background who had other ideas in mind rather than “indigenous people rights”. That was just a vehicle for the tribe to argue so that they could gain exclusivity for their future resort.
Fucken shame if it reverted back to “rich cunts” only.
But big bula chiefs do like their backhanders sooo, I guess someone’s gonna pay…
Just my 0.02c
Let me talk to M
I’ll talk to Q, who will supply us with Bond-like gadgetry!
I’ve got some guys to whom I can pitch the idea…
A Fijian named Frank?
Almost as rare as a Vietnamese man named Charlie.
You’ve got something there. How much green you’d be willing to pony up?
“As a result came finger pointing, name calling, hair pulling, and a couple a coups”
Ummmm – it’s a lot more than that. Fiji is a country where ethnic discrimination is part of the constitution – an ethnic Fijian baby born in Fiji will grow up to have quite a different life than an ethnic Indian baby.
“At the time of independence, Indo-Fijians comprised approximately 50% of the total population. The other major ethnic groups included indigenous Fijians (iTaukei) and various other minority groups”
“As of September 2021, Indo-Fijians accounted for around 37% of the total population of Fiji”
Meaning thousands of ethnic Indians have left the country of their birth rather than live as second-class citizens under constitutionally mandated racial discrimination –
There are other places to surf in the south Pacific, with similar waves and a tiny percentage of the crowds at Cloudbreak and other locations in the Mamanuca Islands –
Yep
If they do decide to reverse the policy will it be effective immediately?.. or will there be a grace period?
No one knows what, if anything, will replace it or if it will be altered, etc. Meeting starts Sept 4.
“There are other places to surf in the south Pacific, with similar waves
and a tiny percentage of the crowds at Cloudbreak and other locations in
the Mamanuca Islands -“
NO there is not! That’s a myth. The ones that are out there are infested with A.I.D.s, noseeums, poisonous spiders that crawl up your peehole, and fat chicks with constant diarrhea…..that have A.I.D.s
I want surf as good as our world champion, pip, so I’m happy to pay big $)) and just sit in channel and watch perfect slabbing lefts go by
is it really an either/or proposition? malibu proves not. you could spend tens of millions to live locally AND wade around in a crowd of millions. WIN/WIN
Doesn’t one of the Google goblins have his yacht nearly permanently moored nearby? I’m sure he has nothing to do with it
Larry Page is the goblin!
the eagle didn’t drop a load today…
hes bought shares in tavi so he could build a house on the island.
Didn’t he buy the whole lot, including Namotu?
That was the first thing that came to mind.
And to underline your point how about this bit of leftist truth
https://amp.theguardian.com…
Larry Ellison had his yatch docked in Kewalos for most of 2012-14.
Which, I’m assuming, was his escape plan should the Lanai residents become…restless.
For some reason googles monopoly is allowed.