Mayhem on Mayhem with a side of mashed 'taters n gravy.
There has not been much activity in the Lost v. Lady Gaga lawsuit since my last article about the briefing in support of, and in opposition to, Lost’s motion for preliminary injunction back in June (read my original article about the significance and importance of that motion if you are not familiar). As previously explained, the judge did not decide to hold a hearing where oral arguments are made, but instead ruled that he would decide the motion based on the papers submitted.
In the interim, Judge Olguin has sat on this motion for an inordinate amount of time (he has a reputation for this) given that it has been over five months since the motion was fully briefed back in May and there still has been no ruling to date.
And though I still think that Lost will almost certainly lose this motion (read my article from back in June if you want to know why), I would be frustrated as hell if I were Matt Biolos in this situation. The entire basis for Lost’s lawsuit and motion for preliminary injunction is that Lady Gaga was on the precipice of embarking on a USA tour in July 2025 where her “Mayhem” clothing merchandise would be sold, which Lost claims infringes on its trademark.
In the interim, however, Lady Gaga has completed the American leg of her 2025 Mayhem Ball tour, playing nearly thirty dates in arenas across the country. If there were ever actually any threatened irreparable harm to Lost, it has already occurred. Olguin’s foot-dragging may very well be an indication that he intends to deny Lost’s motion, but then again, this merely could be Olguin doing Olguin things.
In any event, this delay has gone on for so long that it has resulted in something I’ve rarely seen before—a joint filing submitted by both sides on October 2nd requesting that Judge Olguin finally make a ruling. Judge Olguin did not respond to that request until October 29th via a court minute order, which advised the parties that he would rule on the motion for preliminary injunction no later than November 26th.
For you international readers, that is the day before Thanksgiving in the United States, and when Olguin says “no later” than November 26th, there is a good chance that he will be waiting all the way until November 26th to issue his ruling. And I sincerely hope that is exactly what happens, because either Lady Gaga’s or Matt Biolos’s Thanksgiving holiday would be more than a bit ruined depending on which way Olguin rules.
I too, once had an important statement of decision be issued against my client on the eve of Thanksgiving. I still cooked a turducken the following day, but it was hard to appreciate the savory deliciousness of three different fowls in light of the bitter taste in my mouth.
You win some, you lose some—just make sure you get paid either way.
At any rate, once that ruling comes down, just call me the Ice Cream Man (underrated Van Halen song, btw), because you’ll get the scoop.
am mildly surprised a federal d j responded to this request. In any event, am here for the updates.
‘all my flavors are guaranteed to satisfy’ — true classic!
Radio Gaga Radio Goo Goo sums up surf journalism at this time.
I had a motion denied earlier. When you run to the bathroom but nothing comes out it’s known as a ghost shit.
CHatGPT Mayhem vs MLP https://uploads.disquscdn.c…
Seppocentric
Hahaha kin oath
damn is that being a pedo in pantry…asking for fiend of mine?
Say hi to prince andrew when you see him
First Harry and Meghan are booed at the Dodgers game and now Andrew is booted by Charles. MAYHEM EVERYWHERE
that was a mayhem bottom of the 9th, to be certain
I thought I’d become a complete bandwagon fan until last yr and now this year. My childhood Dodger mayhem/ansgt is back! I had Bowie on in the background and was reading an FT article to distract me when the double play ended the game and my wife screamed… otherwise I missed it!
Them front row wearing dodgers hats was peak cringe.
There is no such thing as bad PR or bad booing!
I think he is looking for a pantry to live in?
a noble pursuit
but you gave a fuck enough to comment!
I just read Lawrence Fossi’s latest Substack legal perspective on Tesla and Musk. Now this gem while watching the Dodgers MAYHEM in Toronto.
someone got me on the Fossi email list (might have been my own act, in a moment of weakness). Nothing if not entertaining …!!
His personal story, parts of which are tragic, is as fascinating as his pedigree. I will say his hatred of Musk is entertaining and arguably justified due to personal experiences(somehwat self-inflicted) with Musk and his “flying monkeys.” Its been too long since I shared a few beers with him in Midtown…
not to tumble down the Delaware comp rules (errr TX) rabbit hole , but I’m a little more in the Musk camp on this stuff.
I do think it’s a little ridiculous that we haven’t figured out as a country a way to share the tens of billions of extra wealth being generated by some of these entities in a way that benefits society more generally, but until someone comes up with a decent approach on that issue writ large, not sure how you take issue with Musk’s pay package given all the circumstances (and I did read the DE court’s rulings on this to see what she was focused on).
I’m a eyes wide open Musk fan as he is in a group of generational creators that is very important to the US and the world. That said, he has trampled on some folks along the way while doing the same with securities regs/rules that is troubling to have observed. As for the pay package, I’m mixed here as he currently has margined his TSLA securities to defer taxes(a technique I know well) so that paired with a comp package that demands an all-out focus on share price(at all costs) leads to interesting and sometimes troubling/well documented machinations. Musk and his compliant BoD combine those two dynamics to allow a CEO who skirts well established GAAP guardrails and public corporate doctrine well beyond the bright lines we expect from publicly traded companies in the US. I could write a long article on this but I’ll leave you with one example that would have put lesser CEOs in a position to be banned from ever running a publicly traded company again- His promise of delivering FSD is and remains an all-out stock pump(to meet his comp package metrics) that he cannot deliver on unlike Waymo. So he feeds from public market money trough will being unwilling to follow the rules/regs.
https://uploads.disquscdn.c…
A couple of weeks ago we heard that Ross Clark Jones had been doing some part-time tiling with one of his Phillip Island mates.
Now it appears that he’s started his own coastal-based tiling business, with a name that could attract an infringement lawsuit.
Beach Grout…
haha..actually he’s doing the Manuel labor thing,LOL.
He’s turned Spanish?
🤣
Mercifully concise, thanks CT.
Matt Biolas is from Chino Hills, California. There’s nothing wrong with that or being a surfer who lives “inland”. There is something wrong with not admitting it as part of your bio. Be honest Matt, I know you’re reading this.
Honesty from a trumpet?
San Gabriel Valley.
Ahhhh. Lost.
Chris Ward. Cory. Strider staring up girls dresses at Squid Row.
Must protect this brand!
Since nothing around here has anything do with surfing anymore, here’s one:
https://uploads.disquscdn.c…
Are you angry at Bill gates?
I come to BG for the serious legal reasoning from Com and of course the mindless Mayhem that BG delivers daily. BUT I’m left to ask myself is the Mayhem I seek inspired by the two Lost boards my oldest owns, or is it tied to Lady Gaga?
So confusing!
Cool, an article announcing a possible announcement, maybe.
prime Beach Grit.
we don’t do much of actual substance around here, and that’s how we like it
there’s definitely some substance abusers though…
matt is going to lose. nobody is going to confuse buying merch at a lady gaga concert with his brand that has very little relevance outside of surfing