"What a repulsive 'photo op' they achieved. They are 'touring the damage'?"
If there was one extremely interesting subplot of the year just past, it was Prince Harry’s full embrace of the Surf Ranch life. The spare heir to the British throne has taken his talents to the Lemoore, California facility a handful of times, now, even potentially learning to barrel, though a visit in October was met with scorn. “The contrast of King Charles interrupting his cancer treatment to perform royal duties on the other side of the world with his self-indulgent 40 year old wastrel son at a surf park is a very stark one …” conservative Australian columnist Gray Connelly penned at the time.
Undaunted, the carrot-topped prodigal took his young son to Surf Ranch to share the joys of artifice and was even captured on film by the legendary Raimana van Bastolear, Derek Rielly sharing, “In the deleted photo, we see Harry and Archie or, to use the lil man’s correct title, Prince Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor, sitting on Raimana’s jetski, waiting for the train to roll down its track and create the famous perfect wave.”
Criticism was muted, that time around, with pundits seemingly happy for a peek into the fancy life or maybe they were just keeping their powder dry, saving it up for a later date which appeared to come yesterday.
Prince Harry and his wife Princess Megan Markle visited fire-scorched Los Angeles over the weekend, touring destroyed areas etc. though their relief efforts were not enjoyed by all.
Actress and twin Justine Bateman took to X, posting a video of the couple possibly handing out bottles of water and declaring, “Meghan Markle and Harry are no better than ambulance chasers. What a repulsive ‘photo op’ they achieved. They are ‘touring the damage’? Are they politicians now? They don’t live here; they are tourists. Disaster Tourists.”
Ouch.
Not yet done, Bateman went upon the news to slam Los Angeles’ handling of the deadly firestorm, demanding heads on spikes.
Thoughts about who’s to blame or was there no way to prevent the scope and scale of the disaster being called one of the worst in U.S. history?