"In the war of the nets, it is time for all governments to put the protection of people first.”
It might be hard for the reader, particularly the majority who swing from the US, to keep up with the epidemic of Great White attacks in Australia: do you mean yesterday’s hit by a Great White in Margs, the hit at Kangaroo Island in October, the disappearance via Great White of Lance Appleby in South Oz, the twelve-footer that attacked a mid-length pilot at Cabarita in August, Steve Payne, six months into a round-Australia trip with his gal and dog, killed in waist-deep blue water in Esperance in March?
In this instance, it’s Mercury Psillakis, brother of the noted Australian shaper Mike Psillakis, who was killed by a Great White shark surfing his local there just north of Dee Why Point, on a pretty spring Saturday afternoon, the eve of Father’s Day.
It was the sort of Great White attack that has become a grim feature of Australian beaches. And it came just as the human-life-is-equivalent-to-animal-life set, usually inner-city dwellers who live in a utopia where meat magically appears in pretty recycled packaging, free of any animal suffering and pain, and enemies of the state are a figment of right-wing imaginations, were about to succeed in their quest to have shark nets removed from NSW beaches.
Unlike southern California, where the Great White appears to co-exist in harmony with surfers and swimmers, the relationship is anything but benign in Australian waters, north, east, south and west.
RIP, Zac, Paul Tadashi, Rob, Mani, Mark, Tim, Simon, Nick, Cameron, Jevon, Paul, Nick, Jarrod, Peter, Sam, Simon, Tod, Khai, Lance, Ken, Bradley, Geoffrey, Brian, Nicholas, Kyle, Bryn, George, Peter, Ben, Chris, Jay, Ben, Doreen, Laeticia, Gary, Andrew, Paul, Steven and, now, Mercury.
Over at Facebook, a debate has raged over nets and the notion of human life being valued more or less than animals. On the Ballina Shark Reports was a compelling piece quoting environmentalists who do see the effectiveness of shark notes.
In the wake of the recent fatal shark attack at Dee Why, Professor Graeme Stewart, of Sydney University, wrote an article on the efficacy of shark nets, in which he lays out historical, as well as recent data proving that shark nets actually do work. He wanted to push back against what he describes as a “well orchestrated war against shark nets in NSW”.
The professor’s article was subsequently endorsed by renowned environmentalist John Dengate, of Burke’s Backyard fame. In his letter to the editor, Dengate says that; “It concerns me that nets are a blunt instrument that catches other sea creatures as well as sharks. But it also concerns me that people are killed by sharks.” This sentiment echoes Professor Stewart’s explanation that: “I have long admired much of the achievements of environmental activists, but not when it puts human life at risk. In the war of the nets, it is time for all governments to put the protection of people first.”
These esteemed gentlemen have also sought an audience with the Minister to discuss the need for shark nets, not just for the currently netted Metropolitan coastlines, but for the whole of NSW.
To which a Leona Lees replied,
Honestly thought this was a spoof post and was gaily reading along waiting for the joke. You feel remorse for ‘non target creatures’ what on earth? Human trauma is more important. What a horrible stance to take that your life is more important than some animals. You know you are more likely to get killed on the motorway whilst going to the beach, than be killed by a shark!?
1 fatal shark death in NSW v 366 road deaths in this year so far. Yep totally justified to put a sea creature killing net around the states coastline.
Why not invest the money used for netting on smarter tech like drones and clever buoys? Why are humans so important that we can just kill other creatures just in case we get hurt?
Mike replied, “My brother’s life was way more important than any shark.”
And, yesterday, Mercury’s widow, Maria, spoke of her desire to use Merc’s death to ensure it don’t happen again.
“Not half an hour later there were children, people, swimming,” said Maria.
Commented on Disqus? Log out, tap the Disqus button, and your old name and comments come back. The box is ours.
Your comments are still here. Every one of them.
Twelve years of BeachGrit comments came across from Disqus. Connect and we will show you how many are yours. We get your username, nothing else.
Connect Disqus to reveal.
People will turn a blind eye to overfishing and pollution which is poisoning the planet
but as soon as it’s some big cool fish with teeth, they turn into moral crusaders
people are stupid unfortunately
I will die with dignity, live for the life. I’ll be back.
The DPI has blood on its hands! It’s time to start culling. Why are Great Whites still protected there clearly a pest now. Harden up snow flakes.
This is fucking ridiculous, clearly shark lives are worth more than human lives.
People > Sharks
Dereks, thoughts on link to recreational fishing boom? Surfing and fishing are same day activities for most surfers now, but – potentially – poor bedfellows. Apex predators love an easy meal and almost every popular surfing coastline is also lousy with recreational fishermen, dragging in decent sized, easy meals. Especially popular on sunny Saturday afternoons.
What’s the question?
Do you think there could be a link in the growing number of shark attacks to the boom in recreational fishing?
no
I’m getting that impression. Although, African Savanna – I semi-successfully shoot an arrow, connected to a rope, into a decent sized antelope. A mate and I proceed to drag it in, writhing and yelping. Close by a group of kids are having fun sliding down an unseasonal slope of mud. What happens next?
you could demonstate cause and effect there, for sure, and shark depredation is a very real thing.
Too easily falsifiable though at the shark hotspots like Ballina, SWWA and South Oz.
No increase in rec fishing, for eg, at Ballina in 2015/16- super gnarly bar and hardly any rec fishing pressure during that cluster.
Once you rule it out once, it’s gone for good as a hypothesis.
I cried a bit when I saw him and his daughter in that photo. All my love to his wife, daughter and to Mike.
I am 100% supportive of ridding the near shore areas of shark nets and having “Anti-Shark Net activists” swim the perimeter of the previous shark net boundaries, to protect sharks…..and humans.
Must See TV
Given widely known fact that nature requires a balance between plants and animals to keep the environment healthy. And the easy to spot (even to the uneducated) and indisputable scientific evidence that we have destroyed the planet to such an extent that global temperatures are likely to exceed pre-industrial levels by 1.5°C. Its mind boggling that some people are so ideologically committed to stupidity that they think humans can continue destroying nature and still expect a liveable future for our kids.
Is your nick name “The Encyclopaedia” ??
Haha, no but unlike you I do respect science and manage to retain what I’ve read, especially the bits that are critical for my kids and their future offspring’s survival.
Stop the press! The new ice age is back! https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/cop/iceland-sees-security-risk-existential-threat-atlantic-ocean-currents-possible-2025-11-12/
Yep, and extreme heat and drought in our two regions. All the more reason to preserve rather than destroy the environment.
I knew checking out the comments here would expose some rabid young female eco-savior that knows culling man-eating predators with sufficient populations world-wide would hasten an environmental apocalypse. After all, don’t GW’s have more of a right to be in the ocean than surfers?
DP isn’t a naive young female out to set the world aright with her keyboard, you say? I’m taking bets.
Haha, welcome to your fantasy world and sorry to disappoint your severely limited grasp of knowledge. Instead it’s just another life long surfer that happily shares space with sharks in what is undoubtably one of the last frontiers of decent uncrowded waves on the planet.
Also all these people that want to make love to sharks and remind us that sharks live in the water have better not bloody eaten bloody fish and chips before!?
I’m con-fu-sed. What exactly is that supposed to mean? Eating a piece of cod or halibut is somehow related to shark copulation?
Most fish and chips are made from flake which is shark!
Human = animal
Human is top of food chain as we can kill what we like.
Human kill shark so they not kill us. Makes sense.
Or
Human stupid. Human let sharks kill them because they love predators.
Also everyone travels on the roads regularly so that statistic is retarted as not everyone gos in the ocean on a regular basis. So by comparison that makes no sense on any level.
Hahahahaha. Nothing like a bit of self expressed human stupidity.
Okay greeny shark hugger self proclaimed genius! Give yourself an upper cut and a cold shower moron.
Nah just someone who is clearly not so plain fucking stupid that I’d somehow think that humankind’s destruction of the planet is OK.
Self righteous wanker is what you are!
I love your articulate writing style. Full of intelligent argument carefully crafted with clear explanations to distract from your obvious lack of knowledge.
Time for government to fund The Orcas For Oz program. 5 killer whales at every beach will sort the fuckers out and we’ll keep our legs. Win Win.
https://uploads.disquscdn.c…
Is that Pip, back on the Brazilian BBQ?
Its only a matter of time before he… moves to a small Brazilian town… kicks up his feet….and slowly turns into Ricardo.
Well at least until the Orcas get sick of our shit.
Then you’ll be laughing at the twisted irony of getting what you wish for.
I bet ya none of them were using the shark repellent bands.
Kid at my local got bit while wearing one of those
Which local?
Mine
everyone knows you need to wear one on each limb and an extra one on the neck
Don’t forget the most important appendage.
This is so sexist I can’t even comment further…
Enemies of the State, like the News Corpse hacks trying to undermine the Albanese government and Ambassador Rudd with Daddy Trump? You mean those actual and active enemies of the state of Australia?
*Corpse: a dead body, especially of a human being rather than an animal.
Corps: a body of people engaged in a particular activity.
Wooosh
Play on words: something usually found whizzing above your brow line.
Sorry but this is fuckin stupid. Sharks can’t live anywhere but the ocean. Surfing in a place with lots of sharks is a choice humans make. Destroying the natural world because it displeases us is indicative of so much that’s wrong with the world.
we manage ecosystems- thats what we’ve done since we roamed the savannah.
We also inhabit the inshore zone and have done since early hominid times.
We’ve also evolved enough to distinguish between being ‘displeased’ and eaten.
And?
there’s things we can do.
There’s a huge area between doing something to try and prevent people getting ripped in half by sharks and destroying the natural world.
Depends on what you mean be doing something to try, I guess. Shark-killing nets and outright culling are non-starters.
We Also clear swathes of bushland for solar and wind farms to reduce CO2 in the atmosphere.
Thats a very easy way of looking at it if you dont live somewhere sharky as fuck and Great White numbers are increasing dramatically every year. You ever had a surfer attacked and killed at your local by a big white? It aint pretty and the fear and anxiety sticks around for a good while
Yes
Shark nets are effective – they have been very successful in Durban, South Africa – as they should be in Australia, once people understand that HUMAN LIFE is in fact more important than other animals.
“Since the installation of shark nets at Durban’s beaches in 1952, no people have been killed by sharks at the protected beaches.
Prior to the nets’ installation, from 1943 to 1951, Durban experienced 21 shark attacks, seven of which were fatal. The success of the program in preventing fatalities at Durban’s protected beaches is considered irrefutable evidence of the nets’ effectiveness”
The expert on South Africa who knows some ex-local ex-core lords, is back in the house. I bet they convinced you that Apartheid was effective too.
Actually, I AM an expert on the contemporary history of Seth Effricka – and no, apartheid was a poisonous policy that set the country back by decades.
Ironically, in 1948 when the National Party first came to power and began their Apartheid programme, Strom Thurmond, a committed racist and segregationist from South Carolina, ran for President of the United States. He did not win, but did finish third in the popular vote indicating an uncomfortable level of racist support.
The history of the US and of South Africa are not so different, especially now; with Trump giving special preference to Afrikaner Immigrants while actively discriminating against everyone non-white who wants to come to the US.
Always good to encounter someone who has a shared view on racist cunts and their shenanigans, which makes it even sadder to discover you think the environment needs that same crews nationalist type fuck you everyone else and the planet type mentality.
Sorry to pop your google search, all things Durban expert bubble but while there have indeed been no fatal incidents at the Durban city beaches since the installation of nets, this is largely due to the fact that sea life in the Durban basin has dramatically declined since the 1952’s to the point that there is very little sea life (i.e shark prey and yes you guessed, sharks!) left at all compared to back then. But there have in fact been multiple non-fatal incidents in Durban as well fatal and non-fatal incidents at other nearby beaches ‘protected’ by nets since 1952. Read and ‘enjoy’ https://sharkincidents.com/states/kwazulu-natal/
“there have indeed been no fatal incidents at the Durban city beaches since the installation of nets”
Thank You
Hahaha, but sorry, thats not the end of the story. The obvious point is that shark incidents (some fatal) still occur frequently despite the nets in our coastal region and that incidents do still occur ‘on the Durban city beaches’. So nets are not a guarantee of safety AND around 90% of sea animals killed are not sharks. This includes dolphins, fish, whales, turtles, rays etc. And of course sharks. Some of which are ‘harmless’ and others are on endangered lists. So go figure.
It’s pretty simple, don’t want the chance of getting nibbled, don’t go in the ocean.
It’s even simpler than that: cull some sharks and less people get nibbled when they go in the ocean
Exactly the solution I’d expect with from someone with your critical thinking abilities.
>”the solution I’d expect with from someone with your critical thinking abilities.”
Peak irony lmao
Nice, you passed the jumbled word test, man , woman, camera, TV.
Sadly you failed, although that’s clearly par for the course in your life. Better luck next time lil guy
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Well done. You fucked his ‘brain’ to an extent that his comments were all extinguished. Keep up the good work!
Maga Mike spit the dummy.
Whoar those 3 cops on the right look doable!
Hahahaha. Always love a fella who can cut through all the fluff and laser in on the important details
The fragility and ephemeral nature of our time here is never easy to face.
true dat- but we’ve done a great job of preventing dumb deaths.